Consumer Internet Security Products Performance Benchmarks (Sept 2011)

http://www.passmark.com/ftp/ESet_vs_9_Competitors_InternetSecuritySuites-Sept2011.pdf

 

Thanks

 

I would say that I am pleased with ESET's results

 

It would be quite strange if ESET would perform poorly in a review financed by ESET themselves.

 

Why is that?

They didn't perform the best in every singel test did they?

 

Can you envision the ad? "Buy Eset because we did lousy.This message paid for by Eset LLC." It wouldn't be good marketing regardless of the vendor.

 

Can you say that in English please

 

See the new improved version above your post. I was in the process of updating it as you posted.

 

Test here tests there, I my opinion ESET and Avast is the lightest AV's

 

for me it about protection first (ESET has done that for me) than system impact, quickness, (eset does well here) , tests are nice but 'real time use' is the real measure...

 

ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

http://www.passmark.com/ftp/ESet_vs_9_Competitors_InternetSecuritySuites-Sept2011.pdf

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

So, where is the link?

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

Link inserted bro....

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

Interesting reading. Thanks for the heads up.

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

The title says it all: ESET ordered this test and obviously they are number one.
A real test would have sound: "10 security suites put to test"

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

sposnors win again

though i somewhat agree with the results

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

No Avast IS ?

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

Even if the test is sponsored the results are genuinely true. Seems to be vendors order these tests when they have improved while the other not.

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

Already posted. https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=307702 - Has since been merged together.

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

This report is a good example of how a professional test is done. It defines the hardware and the software platforms, and explains the testing methodology. I wonder though why there is no focus on malware detection and removal? Just rating the performance aspects of security software seems to miss the point.

Edit: Note that there is now a review of ESET SS v5 on PCMAG.com - it didn't do too well unfortunately.

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

Here have a better Test of new Eset 5.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392635,00.asp

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

PassMark develops software for benchmarking. They have in-depth knowledge in this field. You should love the detailed and very well conducted professional tests, they are hard to find

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

Id be interested seeing Comodo IS in there too.

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

A better overview and I agree with their findings. If performance were THE issue then everyone would be running ESET. I prefer something that runs as trouble free as possible and this isn't it.

 

Re: ESet 5 vs nine competitors Performance Benchmarks by PassMark

True...eset forum is full of troubles rite now after release of version 5