NOD32 2.5 - Comments & opinions

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 v3 Beta Forum' started by Marcos, Mar 30, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    If you want to share your opinions regarding the new NOD32 2.5 beta, feel free to post them here.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2005
  2. nameless

    nameless Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Posts:
    1,233
    I'll be the first to ask... Do we have to uninstall 2.1 first?
     
  3. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    I installed it over the previous version without problems.
     
  4. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    Nope, it is possible to install it on the top of the version you have currently installed.
     
  5. shlomi245

    shlomi245 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Posts:
    2
    Install was fast, memory usage seems to be the the same (low). the new configuragtion options are looking good.
    great job guys.
    One question if i can, Adware/Spyware/Riskware are in the On-Demand options are now separate from the Potentially dangerous applications option. to what applications does this refers to?

    Thanks again, excellent software.
     
  6. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    Potentially dangerous applications cover especially tools for remote administration.
     
  7. nameless

    nameless Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Posts:
    1,233
    Thanks for the responses. I guess I'm not feeling brave, and didn't want to assume that 2.5 could be installed over 2.1.

    I hope this doesn't turn into another aggravating KAV-like experience, where half of the command line tools I use get flagged as "riskware", because they do naughty things like terminate processes...
     
  8. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    163,919
    Location:
    Texas
    Does the use of alternative NTFS streams leave tags on the hard drive?
     
  9. Access Denied

    Access Denied Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2003
    Posts:
    927
    Location:
    Computer Chair
    If you have KAV installed, REMOVE it before you install NOD32! Well, atleast on this pc anyway. I had to reload a (insert cusswords here) image. :D
     
  10. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    No, enabling NTFS streams will only make NOD32 check in NTFS streams.
     
  11. tosbsas

    tosbsas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    789
    Location:
    Lima, Peru
    Only thing with install on top - I do have administrative version installed - up to now I only see standard version - need to deinstall??

    Ruben
     
  12. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    On what I see on a first look is that the heuristic was improved a bit mainly regarding trojans and DOS viruses. After the scan - if something was found suspicious - it automatically asks and then submits the files to ESET; nice feature :)
    On Morphine 2.7 there is maybe an unpack error; I will contact Mike tomorrow about this.
     
  13. nameless

    nameless Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Posts:
    1,233
    The Early Warning System feature is great, but it would be nice if it allowed users to view the data that was about to be sent, prior to sending it out (unless configured to send immediately, of course).

    For example, I'd like to see a log--or at least a window--that showed what path names were about to be sent, what "operating system information", and so on. Basically, what Microsoft did with the Error Reporting service in Windows XP.
     
  14. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    I install it over my Admin version and works fine.

    With this version, have 2 reboots, my system startup was much more quick!!! Excellent... :D

    One of many reasons because I love NOD32 is because their excellent programmers! You are the bests in this area... ;)

    Questions:
    1. How can I disable the theme support for NOD32? I've some problems with that? :(
    2. Why this new version installed the EMON?

    http://img190.exs.cx/img190/6954/nod32bugthemesupportandemon7cm.png

    Suggestion:
    1. Why not make a pause button to pause a scan in on-demand?

    Best regards and keep the excellent work :D
     
  15. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    Hi Nameless,

    NOD32 shows a confirmation window with a list of files evaluated as suitable for analysis before the files are actually submitted.
     
  16. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,275
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Excellent Feature Set, nice and fast still, and nice to see that they are dealing with Adware & Spyware well see what the release version will be like 3 THUMBS UP!!!:D :D
     
  17. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    Just a write error in the Help:

    Regards
     
  18. iwod

    iwod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Posts:
    708
    Feature wise it looks like some nice improvement. Especially the Spyware improvement. Edit: File size has gone up as well.


    But looks like GUI has not changed at all for the newbees and it is stopping NOD32 get a good score in Magazine. ( Even though none of the magazine knows how to test AV anyway )

    May be NOD32 V3 will give us some surprise ^^

    Edit: May be because of added Spyware signatures so that file size has gone up? Anyone would test it?
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2005
  19. tosbsas

    tosbsas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    789
    Location:
    Lima, Peru
    1. Saw a new licence key feature in setup - gone send out licences keys now?? I only have a mail and a xls file.

    2. To update - shall we use our licence or the beta25 licence that comes up automatically

    3. Up to now - great !!!!! faster, less intrusive - I am impressed

    Ruben
     
  20. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    Changed!? Where? o_O
     
  21. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    Some more questions:

    1. Why DMON doesn't have the "Optimize Scanning" feature of AMON? R: post 69
    2. The cache of the "Optimize Scanning" feature only remains until we restart the windows, right? R: Yes.

    Thanks

    [EDIT: answered the 2º question; 1º question was answered...]
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2005
  22. Howard

    Howard Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2004
    Posts:
    313
    Location:
    Wales, UK
    This is looking great. I am particularly pleased to now have EMON checking my IMAP email in Outlook 2002 and I am delighted you have not dumbed down the GUI.
     
  23. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,530
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    So far running like a champ... The "optimize scanning" feature in AMON seems interesting.
     
  24. spm

    spm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Posts:
    440
    Location:
    U.K.
    New Command-Line Params Not Working

    NOD32 on-demand scanner rejects the new /adware+ and /unsafe+ switches as being invalid.
     
  25. tazdevl

    tazdevl Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Posts:
    837
    Location:
    AZ, USA
    Re: New Command-Line Params Not Working

    Send an email to beta25@eset.sk
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.