real-time defender/malwaredender/processguard?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by jmonge, Sep 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    any recomendations?thanks in advance.
    base on user experience.
     
  2. bellgamin

    bellgamin Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    5,648
    Location:
    Hawaii
    With 10 being best, RTD is 9.999. MD is 9.1. Never used PG.

    As to support -- RTD & PG are VERY o_O whereas MD is vigorously supported & its developer is active here at Wilders.

    I use RTD at present but will *likely* switch to MD if RTD's developer doesn't manifest interest in Western-world users SOON.
     
  3. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    i was trying to find info about rtd and eqsecure but was not lucky.cause i dont read korean:D but thats ok i will try to wait a week or so.mean while i will keep malware defender active:thumb:
    thanks for replying.
     
  4. demoneye

    demoneye Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,356
    Location:
    ISRHell
    pg didnt update long time ... even they "update" to 3.5 its a ghost update only for the show off... u can find posts in here avout this

    RTD never use............so no comment:D

    MD is new and look very very good , u cant compare it to PG , MD got a wide open range of control the pc proccess and much MUCH more .... so my vote goes to MD and to its amazing developer

    chhers
     
  5. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    another vote for malware defender:thumb: thanks for replying.
     
  6. LoneWolf

    LoneWolf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Posts:
    3,408
    Based on my experiances with these I'd say Malware Defender most definantly.
    Never used RTD but used Prosecurity in the past.
    Just waiting on a few features to be added to Malware Defender before buying myself.
     
  7. BrendanK.

    BrendanK. Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Posts:
    520
    Location:
    Australia
    I'm using RTD and I am really liking it. Haven't used MD so I can't tell you how it compares, sorry.
     
  8. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    5,633
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    This is a great time for windows SUPER SECURITY as in new HIPS, and a little older HIPS which are performing IMO at their best!

    I currently (of course) use EQS 4.0 and am really excited over RTD's apparent excellent coverages and such, and if that wasn't enough, i'm coming on strong with equal excitement over Malware Defender.

    This is been sorely missing the past year, that is more than a scant couple of HIPS a user can really rely on and realize absolute positive results.

    I'll also throw in i too on another system even use the relic ProcessGuard. In all of my current configs they are complimented with the back breaker Behavioral Blocker (another so-called relic) Cyberhawk that does a perfect job at sitting in wait in event any of these HIPS were either turned off or skipped a malicious probe file, which is highly unlikely, but as backups are the backbone of restoration in event of some trouble, CH serves in that same purpose along with my HIPS and i couldn't be more pleased.

    EASTER
     
  9. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    thank you every body for your kind reply:thumb:
     
  10. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,434
    Location:
    Europe
  11. bellgamin

    bellgamin Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    5,648
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Some folks tend not to pay a lot of attention to posts with odd colors or fonts. Also, not every one runs both KIS & RTD.

    If you are really interested in termination issues, I suggest you research Wilders -- there are many threads on that topic. For example, check THIS one -- especially post 44. Be aware that Prosecurity (PS) was the former name of RTD.

    For me, nothing I have tested was able to terminate RTD 1.0 (PS 1.43). In fact, it was not possible even to directly & permanently delete/modify RTD's key files/services except by full uninstall. However, I do not have KIS in order to replicate the conditions you encountered. By the way -- KIS has its own HIPS, which duplicates the fact that RTD, too, is a HIPS. Did you kill the KIS HIPS before installing/running RTD?
     
  12. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,434
    Location:
    Europe
    Hi bellgamin, thanks for the 3D link that you posted, I already read it. As I wrote in my linked post:

    " I 've installed RTD, rebooted, setted it in Normal Mode. Finally I've installed KIS 7. If I run it without the Proactive Defense, RTD runs normally. If I set the KIS in Proactive Defense ( previous giving all the authorizations for RTD in KIS ), RTD runs as I described in this 3D at the post 66. And also if afterwards I disable the Proactive Defense, RTD does'nt run more normally. This is what concern me ! ".

    It sounds to me like KIS terminates RTD, or anyway some functions of RTD. And this is the reason for I say: where is the RTD autoprotection, if I have only to run KIS Proactive Defense to block RTD ? o_O o_O

    I use SSM since 2006, since 2007 with KIS, but KIS does'nt block neither changes SSM activities or settings.
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2008
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. drhu22
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    492
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.