'Kernel memory leaking' Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign

Discussion in 'other security issues & news' started by Minimalist, Jan 2, 2018.

  1. paulderdash

    paulderdash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Posts:
    4,644
    Location:
    Under a bushel ...
    Just ran and ran here, so killed it. "(Maybe AppGuard, but was set to ''Allow Installs').

    Checked ExecutionPolicy now and all are set to Undefined.
     
  2. PEllis

    PEllis Guest

    Assuming you're running a compatible AV, and a supported version of Windows, you will eventually receive the patches automatically, right?
     
  3. hawki

    hawki Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Posts:
    6,077
    Location:
    DC Metro Area
    "Canonical Fixes Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Regression Causing Boot Failure on Some PCs

    Canonical has released on Wednesday a new Linux kernel update for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus) operating system series to address a regression introduced with yesterday's security patch against the Meltdown vulnerability..."

    http://news.softpedia.com/news/cano...causing-boot-failure-on-some-pcs-519320.shtml
     
  4. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,885
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
    Ultimate. I can use Gpedit, there is just no Windows Powershell folder, where it should be...
     
  5. mary7

    mary7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2017
    Posts:
    57
    Location:
    Italy
    after used Ashapoo tool my current user was set to bypass and used the command that say itman and now is set to Restricted, the others are Undefined, it's ok or do I have to change something? Ashampoo chamnge only current user policy ?
     
  6. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Posts:
    3,367
    Location:
    Italy
  7. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Posts:
    24,107
    Location:
    UK
  8. B-boy/StyLe/

    B-boy/StyLe/ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    519
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    Hmmm I am still waiting for a BIOS update for my board:

    https://www.asrock.com/MB/Intel/Z370 Extreme4/index.bg.asp#BIOS

    But today I received an update for (I)MEI

    https://i.imgur.com/WPfQ2xC.png

    There is no information about it yet. Regarding the BIOS changelog my version of (I)ME firmware is 11.8.50.3425. I Googled a bit and find that (I)MEI 11.7.0.1045 is the latest version.
    I found a version of (I)MEI that is 11.7.0.1058 but it should be the same since the 11.7.0.1058 is only for the GUI (Intel Management Engine Interface (MEI) 11.7.0.1045 (GUI 11.7.0.1058 ).

    I checked the Device Manager and it seems that my current version is older so I am gonna apply the update.

    https://i.imgur.com/pGDhCjd.png

    When I checked the Device Manager I find one funny thing. The year for this update is messed up...1968? Really? :)

    https://i.imgur.com/nOHsoxy.png

    What a mess...I am always using the official sites for the drivers but I am wondering from where they got this version Intel Management Engine Interface (MEI) 12.0.1071 (GUI 12.0.1087). That is really odd. :)

    hXXp://driveroff.net/soft/chipsetintelmei/
     
  9. mary7

    mary7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2017
    Posts:
    57
    Location:
    Italy
  10. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Posts:
    3,367
    Location:
    Italy

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/po.../about_execution_policies?view=powershell-5.1

     
  11. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Posts:
    24,107
    Location:
    UK
    @B-boy/StyLe/

    Some info regarding 1968 date here

    https://communities.intel.com/thread/110428
     
  12. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
    I seem to have read somewhere that Powershell is a replacement for CMD...

    Policy Execution is as:

    Windows Powershell_Execution Policy_01.JPG
     
  13. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Posts:
    3,367
    Location:
    Italy

     
  14. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
  15. mary7

    mary7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2017
    Posts:
    57
    Location:
    Italy
    so if is undefined in 4 and in one restricted is the same of "If the execution policy in all scopes is Undefined, the effective execution policy is Restricted, which is the default execution policy"?

    I read this example:

    Scope ExecutionPolicy
    ----- ---------------
    MachinePolicy Undefined
    UserPolicy Undefined
    Process Undefined
    CurrentUser RemoteSigned
    LocalMachine AllSigned

    In this case, the effective execution policy is RemoteSigned because the execution policy for the current user takes precedence over the execution policy set for the local computer.

    so Restricted in current user will aplly to all other 4 policy, correct?
     
  16. B-boy/StyLe/

    B-boy/StyLe/ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    519
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    Thanks @stapp ,didn't know that.

    Btw ok it seems that the (I)MEI released via WU was really a new version:

    https://i.imgur.com/3u3LRri.png

    So now I should wait for a new (I)ME version for the BIOS. Also I may need to update from 8.1 to 10 regarding the info here:

    https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/mi...-and-meltdown-mitigations-on-windows-systems/

    For context, on newer CPUs such as on Skylake and beyond, Intel has refined the instructions used to disable branch speculation to be more specific to indirect branches, reducing the overall performance penalty of the Spectre mitigation. Older versions of Windows have a larger performance impact because Windows 7 and Windows 8 have more user-kernel transitions because of legacy design decisions, such as all font rendering taking place in the kernel.

    Regards,
    Georgi
     
  17. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
    Lucky that I have Skylake chip in my Surface Book... ;)
     
  18. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,241
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    This machine does too but as for my other older machines they are so-out-of-luck.
     
  19. B-boy/StyLe/

    B-boy/StyLe/ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    519
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    I have Coffee-Lake (i7-8700k) but still will update to Win 10 if the performance hit is huge. ;)
     
  20. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
    I only have the Surface Book and my (now) old custom build XP desktop. So, no performance hit... ;)
     
  21. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
    I haven't noticed a performance hit, touch wood. ;)
     
  22. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
    I got a driver update for Intel Management Engine Interface, earlier today:

    Intel_IME_update_01.JPG
     
  23. paulderdash

    paulderdash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Posts:
    4,644
    Location:
    Under a bushel ...
    I am resigning myself to the fact that my 3 years old Haswell ThinkPad Yoga is a shadow of its former self after KB4056892. Glacial boot and Macrium backups, high memory use with e.g. explorer, etc.

    But wait, there's more :) ... complementary daily BSODs thrown in for good measure.
     
  24. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
    Haswell to has-been? ;) I have my 19 month old Surface Book to take me through for at least a couple of more years, hopefully.
     
  25. paulderdash

    paulderdash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Posts:
    4,644
    Location:
    Under a bushel ...
    Yes, I have also recently purchased an 8th Gen Dell (no noticable slowdown, but no doubt still affected), but the idea was to have at least two good machines simultaneously.

    The ''has-been'' is not unusable, but just frustrating, considering it was fine a week ago o_O. Both machines have also had BIOS updates.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.