New test - pcwelt ?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by tsilo, May 26, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 212eta

    212eta Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Posts:
    67
    Re: New tests?

    Despite your tone, you got my point in your previous message.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 19, 2007
  2. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    Re: New tests?

    seriously, i dont think i did.

    i, like everyone else, aint really sure what you mean.
     
  3. 212eta

    212eta Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Posts:
    67
    Re: New tests?

    I mean that the way these tests are conducted delays, not to say
    locks out, the induction of new products and/or new versions of the existing ones.
    As tests require the exactly same products, it takes a lot of time to see something really different.
    As am not an native-english speaker and with the speed of reply, I misunderstood your words.
    If some of you want to make fun of it, no problem.
    For the ones, who are not av-comparatives.org followers or who want more info about other results:
    virusinfo.info
    pcwelt.de
    chip.de (the blog)

    I learn not to shoot the others who have a different opinion...

    Have a Good Night!!!
     
  4. 212eta

    212eta Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Posts:
    67
    Re: New tests?

    At least, I didn't use that kind of language...
    Does av-comparatives.org sponsor you?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 19, 2007
  5. Bubba

    Bubba Updates Team

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    11,271
    Re: New tests?

    I'll first of all ask that We despense with the less than respectful responses and word usage. I'll also ask that We find our way back to the thread topic which happens to be the PcWelt test not about other AV tests. The personal references and other forums business is not our concern. Discuss the test not the individuals.

    If the discussion of other AV tests is desired....do so by starting another thread Please.

    Thanks,
    Bubba

    [Edit]
    Off topic posts to this threads topic removed. I suggest the above request be re-read, in particular the part "If the discussion of other AV tests is desired....do so by starting another thread Please."
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2007
  6. apm

    apm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    Posts:
    164
  7. SystemJunkie

    SystemJunkie Resident Conspiracy Theorist

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Posts:
    1,500
    Location:
    Germany
    Yes and it fits in what I thought, bit defender overruns avira.
     
  8. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    yes, webwasher uses Avira with some cranked up add-ins.;)
     
  9. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    163,883
    Location:
    Texas
    One post removed. Use the personal message feature of the forums for private messages.

    Also read the Terms Of Service as to what may be posted here in the forums.
     
  10. Bubba

    Bubba Updates Team

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    11,271
    more posts removed.

    One more time.... "If the discussion of other AV tests is desired....do so by starting another thread Please.". This thread concerns the pcwelt test.
     
  11. Scoobs72

    Scoobs72 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Posts:
    1,113
    Location:
    Sofa (left side)
    Re: New tests?


    @212ETA, I apologise for inferring that you are a complete idiot. No, I am not sponsored by av-comparatives.
     
  12. gerardwil

    gerardwil Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Posts:
    4,750
    Location:
    EU
    Latest PCWelt results from the past 12 month's:

    December 2007 edition, page 102

    Gerard
     
  13. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet
    Any link?
     
  14. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    its in the printed version; its basically just a reprinted summary of some tests done between december 2006, the big one from March 2007 and a small rootkit test of if i remember right september 2007. i have it not in front of me right now, so someone needs to confirm what i said.
     
  15. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet
    Thanks IBK
     
  16. gerardwil

    gerardwil Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Posts:
    4,750
    Location:
    EU
    Tested on 23.05.2007: Backdoors, Trojans, Bots and Worms
    Tested on 04.02.2007: Office Exploits
    Tested on 16.12.2006: ITW Viruses
    Tested on 16.10.2007: Active Rootkits

    Highest overall score: 99.35
    Lowest overall score: 61.44

    That's all folks,

    Gerard
     
  17. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
  18. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    Drweb soo low, I think its time they give Me some answers!
     
  19. midway40

    midway40 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Posts:
    1,257
    Location:
    SW MS, USA
    Wow, check out MS and Trend moving on up in the ranks.
     
  20. dan_maran

    dan_maran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Posts:
    1,053
    Location:
    98031
    HA! how long before the NOD32 fanboys discredit this test from Marx.
     
  21. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    Sophos getting a high score = instant fail. Also, everybody knows ClamAV's score shouldn't even nearly be that high.
     
  22. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    well drweb is down by about 9 percent, which is not a small margin, so somebody needs to start doing something, this only agrees what I've said on my latest thread for the doctor.
     
  23. risl

    risl Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    581
    I don't usually care about tests because I've never had any trouble with malware, but still a bit disappointed since 4.44 was supposed to have better detection(.origin&rootkits). Hopefully some from Dr.Web comments on this. :thumbd:
     
  24. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet
    BD is flying high & high! (Only if they hadn't made that new useless GUI...)

    F-PROT is going better than ever.

    Good job, guys!

    Mike
     
  25. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    No, Sopho's decent scores are due to "Mad Packer detection" (TM) :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.