ZoneAlarm Pro Serious Security Vulnerabilities!?

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by ronny, May 31, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Perman

    Perman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Posts:
    2,161
    Hi,folks: I have made a painful decision: due to stubborn inaction and persistent silence from ZL, I jump the ZA ship and continue my sailing with OUTPOST FW, updated version V.4 today. I do hope Agitium has a different mentality towards new discovery, and never will let their clients STAND ALONE.*puppy*
     
  2. ned kelly

    ned kelly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    Posts:
    14
    I had been a loyal user of Outpost firewall, but on reading Permans reason for jumping ship has also made me to want to change firewalls. I have now decided to use ZA Pro 6.5. since Agnitum are going to use matousek to test its firewealls...
     
  3. unhappy_viewer

    unhappy_viewer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Posts:
    259
    ZL is not the only one to be silent. Sunbelt Software have also being keeping quiet about their views on this post. Does that make both Zone Labs and Sunbelt Software bad companies? If it does, god help the computer community since firewalls from these two companies have the largest market share in the world..
     
  4. ellison64

    ellison64 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Posts:
    2,570
    Unless you have made an error with the build number (or are an agnitum beta tester) ,version 4 of outpost is still a beta and not publicly released yet,so you could end up with a bigger security headache than staying with ZA.
    ellison
     
  5. larryb52

    larryb52 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Posts:
    1,131

    ZA 6.1 is good but 6.5 is a nightmare , I'd go with Kerio & have on my laptop...Outpost is making a serious mistake to deal with those guys
     
  6. zopzop

    zopzop Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    Posts:
    642
    why dont' they do this:

    submit ONE of each type of flaw (critial, serious, medium, minimal) in zonealarm (total no more than 4) to secunia. IF secunia verifies these flaws as legit, THEN matousec will be vindicated. JMHO.
     
  7. Velnias

    Velnias Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2004
    Posts:
    32
    Very funny - so ZA security flows are Motousec's headache :cool:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.