Zemana AntiMalware

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Wendi, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:15 PM.

  1. Wendi

    Wendi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    578
    Location:
    NY, USA
    I just downloaded and installed Zemana AntiMalware Free (v3.1.395) and my first scan found and deleted a bothersome Chrome hijacker as well as a suspect driver. Both of those malware were never detected by WD (neither in realtime or with its scans), so ZAM seems to be a very worthwhile addition! :thumb:

    Question: Does the Premium version offer additional benefits when using ZAM only as a 'second opinion' scanner?
     
  2. Bill_Bright

    Bill_Bright Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Posts:
    3,522
    Location:
    Nebraska, USA
    You are assuming the Chrome hijacker and "suspect" driver were indeed "malware". For sure, the "suspect" one may not have been. I see that the same as a PUP ("potentially" unwanted program). Potentially does NOT mean "definitely is" unwanted. In fact, I have seen several that definitely were wanted and were legitimate.

    And browser hijackers typically change your home page, redirect you to other and possibly dangerous sites, or change what is displayed when you visit a page. If those changes never occurred, then it is more likely those were false positives and not real malware.

    Still, it is always good to have a secondary scanner available to double check to make sure you, the user and always weakest link in security, or your primary scanner didn't let something slip by. While I generally recommend Malwarebytes for that, Zemana makes for a good secondary scanner too.
    Like Malwarebytes, the main difference between the free and paid/premium versions is the premium includes a real-time scanner.
     
  3. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,141
    Just to add my two cents, ALL browser hijackers detections that I have seen until now from Zemana were false positives, so it is pretty bad in this aspect.
     
  4. Bertazzone

    Bertazzone Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2018
    Posts:
    172
    Location:
    USSR
    @Wendi

    Agreed. Zemana has work to do on its on-demand scanner and real-time, which is probably not worth $$$.
     
  5. SIR****TMG

    SIR****TMG Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    826
    I agree with both of you above
     
  6. Hiltihome

    Hiltihome Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Posts:
    827
    Location:
    Baden Germany
    Me too.
    All false positives!
    At the current state I don't recommend to trust ZAM 3.xx
     
  7. ako

    ako Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Posts:
    647
    I removed Zemana due to too many false positives. I had still a few months left on my free licence.
     
  8. bellgamin

    bellgamin Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    6,630
    Location:
    Hawaii
    I have used ZAM Premium for a long time. All of its alerts have been verified by at least 6 or 7 Virus Total scanners. No FPs here. By the way, I only run ZAM on demand but use Premium so as to support a useful security app.
     
  9. Wendi

    Wendi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    578
    Location:
    NY, USA
    I do not believe the Chrome hijacker was a FP. Before ZAM detecting and removing it I frequently experienced annoying popup ads upon launching Chrome. Since ZAM's actions I have not had any of those popups (yet). :doubt:

    @Bill_Bright replied that the main difference between the Free and Premium versions is the inclusion of a real-time scanner in the paid version. Since I intend to use ZAM only for 2nd opinion scans that feature isn't of value to me.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2019 at 4:48 PM
  10. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,141
    @Bill_Bright already adressed your question:
    The only "benefit" is the real-time scanner and for me it isnt worth it.
     
  11. Bill_Bright

    Bill_Bright Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Posts:
    3,522
    Location:
    Nebraska, USA
    I certainly agree that popup ads can be extremely annoying, but that does not make them malicious - nor are popup ads an indication of a browser hijacker.

    I recommend you give Malwarebytes Free a try. You might like it better. FTR, I use Windows Defender on all my W10 systems here. And I use Malwarebytes Free on 4 systems and Premium on the my main two. Malwarebytes Premium is one of the very few antimalware solutions that plays well with other programs. I have not experienced any problems running both in real time at the same time.
     
  12. Wendi

    Wendi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    578
    Location:
    NY, USA
    Hi Bill. I didn't really believe those popups were malicious, but they were annoying for sure and (so far) they are gone! I do appreciate your suggestion that I try MBAM Free. Since you seem to prefer it over ZAM, I will try it.

    Wendi
     
  13. bellgamin

    bellgamin Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    6,630
    Location:
    Hawaii
    As BBright said, the only difference between free & premium is the real-time scanner.
     
  14. Hiltihome

    Hiltihome Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Posts:
    827
    Location:
    Baden Germany
    I have used ZAM from the very start, and was impressed.
    So impressed, that I did the German translation for Zemana.
    But that was ZAM V2.XX
    V3.XX produces soo much FP's, that I warn relying on it.
    Since V3.XX is out, I see not progress, instead it's getting worse.
    Anmerkung 2019-10-12 035435.jpg
     
  15. Surt

    Surt Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2019
    Posts:
    62
    Location:
    USA
    It's a good thing SpyShelter showed up, but I still miss the original ZAL with its logical, well structured "outdated" GUI. And a simple, singular purpose, anti-logging, in one's own preferred, layered strategy.

    ZAL-RIP.jpg
     
  16. Bill_Bright

    Bill_Bright Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Posts:
    3,522
    Location:
    Nebraska, USA
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.