You can only have 4 Anti-Malware apps: What would you run?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by InfinityAz, Aug 9, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. richrf

    richrf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Posts:
    1,907
    Thanks for the tabulation!

    Regards,
    Rich
     
  2. HD rider UK

    HD rider UK Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Posts:
    121
    Location:
    Gloucestershire, UK
    For what its worth, here is my selection

    ZA Free (or if software firewalls are not included - Avast)
    Ewido Full
    Online Armour
    Webroot Spysweeper Full

    HDriderUK
     
  3. muf

    muf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Posts:
    926
    Location:
    Manchester, England
    1. Any known respectable firewall. Take your pick!
    2. KAV with extended bases.
    3. BOClean
    4. Regrun Gold
     
  4. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    Nod32
    Process Guard 3
    RegDefend
    Look n Stop

    Though I would want to add in CounterSpy and Acronis True Image 8.0

    Cheers :D

    PS. this would have been good as a Poll.
     
  5. Alantir

    Alantir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Posts:
    12
    1. Outpost Firewall Pro
    2. NOD32
    3. ProcessGuard
    4. RegDefend
     
  6. gerardwil

    gerardwil Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Posts:
    4,748
    Location:
    EU
    At the moment, but changing every now and then:

    BitDef Pro
    Ewido Plus
    Spy Sweeper
    Pest Patrol
     
  7. hollywoodpc

    hollywoodpc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Posts:
    1,325
    Very simple for security .

    Online Armour
    AntiMalware by Trustware
    Good firewall ( Preferrably Outpost Pro )
    Good AV ( Preferrably NOD 32 )
     
  8. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,618
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    1) ShadowUser Pro 2.5
    2) Outpost Firewall Pro 2.7
    3) NOD32
    4) ProcessGuard full version
     
  9. Wai_Wai

    Wai_Wai Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Posts:
    556
    What is KAV with extended bases?
    How can I get this?
     
  10. Wake2

    Wake2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    Posts:
    205
    After giving this some thought ..

    1) Kaspersky
    2) OutpostPro
    3) Firefox w/SpywareBlaster
    4) ProcessGuard

    Wai_Wai extended databases in Kaspersky are in settings,
    threats and exclusions, antivirus database in use, and the
    choices are to use standard or extended.

    Regards,

    Wake
     
  11. richrf

    richrf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Posts:
    1,907
    In the Pro version, there is also a redundant database setting. I do not believe Pro is available in the U.S market anymore, though ICE Systems may be still making it available to their customers.

    Rich
     
  12. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    The redundantbases are not available anymore, the option is just still there in the GUI, but they are not on the server and AFAIK are only available to sysadmins who request them.

    Kaspersky Pro is still sold through http://store.ice-kav.com/, the Us-distributor and i think it's also available the official site, can't test that because i'm located in europe, but it was only pulled for a while AFAIK, you can see for yourself if it's there now: http://www.kaspersky.com/store
     
  13. Wai_Wai

    Wai_Wai Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Posts:
    556
    Just my first thought.
    Does that option make sense?

    Everyone wishes to have more protection, so they should choose "extended".
    Any ideas why KAV would offer such options?
    And in your opinion, which do you think should be chosen, standard or extended?
     
  14. muf

    muf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Posts:
    926
    Location:
    Manchester, England
    Extended bases include detection of spyware, adware, Keyloggers, dialers etc. I've always used extended for the further protection.

    muf
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2005
  15. richrf

    richrf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Posts:
    1,907
    Thanks for the updated info Don.

    Rich
     
  16. richrf

    richrf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Posts:
    1,907
    The only reason I can think of for the options is that there may be more false positives with the extended database that some users may not want to deal with. I use extended databases, and don't remember ever getting a false positive but other users have reported such occurrences.

    Rich
     
  17. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    The extended don't generate more false positives than the standard, hate that word actually, because they are more than adequate for most users and by far the biggest, the extended "only" adds 8500 sigs ATM of adware, pornstuff and riskware, the most important thing with the extended is to not set Kav to auto delete and you are warned not to do this when you switch to the extended, the reason for this is the riskware catagory, the are not infections, but detections of programs that are potentially risky to use and much of the FP's you hear about from the extended are actually from this riskware catagory and not really FP's, but it is of course annoying if you have deleted a program you like and use daily this way. :)
     
  18. toploader

    toploader Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2005
    Posts:
    707
    only four hmmmm that's a tuffy, lemme see now - i've still got a lot of research to do on this subject so my answer will probably change directly after i hit the post button.

    if online armour fulfils it's early promise then i can see myself giving it serious consideration as my primary defence shield around ver 1.4 if the firewall makes it into the setup.

    that should stop most things from running - though i'm not sure if it will be able to handle the next generation of invisible root kits.

    i would want a second layer of defence in the shape of a good spyware/trojan scanner - i'm not sure there are many that cut the mustard at the moment - most scanners only find a percentage of what's out there and malware is getting more and more sophisicated according to the black hat briefings. it would be between spycop and counterspy at the moment.

    i would want a good windows cleanup program something that could fix registry errors with one click but would have full manual editing as well for more inticate work if needs be. i'm not sure at the moment what that might be.

    my 4th application would be a good anti-virus again my knowledge is sketchy here - Norton is the market leader so i would probably go for that until i understood better what else is out there. at the moment i'm using AVG which i'm not sure is up to the job but then it's hard to tell until i get a virus and find out just how good AVG is.
     
  19. trojan

    trojan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Posts:
    123
    Location:
    london
    1 kav pro with (redundant) database lol
    2 port explorer
    3 sygate pro or outpost
    4 spyware doctor

    change the question to 6 apps so i can have tds-3 and keen sence hidden process viewer :cool:
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2005
  20. donsan

    donsan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Posts:
    149
    Location:
    grand prairie tx
    kav 5.0 personal pro
    process guard
    regdefend
    outpost pro 2.7
     
  21. PnP

    PnP Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2003
    Posts:
    196
    Location:
    Italy
    NOD32 2.5025
    Zonealarm 6
    BoClean
    Regdefend
     
  22. rawr

    rawr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Posts:
    128
    Location:
    Illinois, U.S.A
    Nod32
    Spyware Doctor
    Spyware Eliminator
    Ewido


    .. plus both my software & hardware firewall. :D
     
  23. Paranoid2000

    Paranoid2000 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2004
    Posts:
    2,839
    Location:
    North West, United Kingdom
    Better late than never...my current setup:

    Outpost Pro (firewall plus simple web/email filtering)
    System Safety Monitor (program control plus registry monitoring)
    Process Guard (more robust than SSM but less control)
    Proxomitron (with Grypen's filterset plus custom filters - top class webpage filtering)

    No anti-virus (I have been testing KAV2006 but it's been removed after a day due to problems) since my risk profile is minimal (I've only encountered one virus, in an email, during the last 6 years). The emphasis in my setup is filtering what comes in and controlling what gets run.
     
  24. Rmus

    Rmus Exploit Analyst

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    4,020
    Location:
    California
    Better late than never...my current setup:

    1) Kerio 2.1.5 Firewall
    2) ISP with email filtering (spam/malware)
    2) Anti-Executable
    3) Deep Freeze

    No AV/AT since my risk profile is minimal - and no AV/AT program can match the 100% prevention rate that I have experienced in many years.

    The emphasis in my setup is filtering what comes in and controlling what gets run.

    EDIT: Just informed that ISP filter is not an application that I run; oh well...

    -rich
    ________________
    ~~Be ALERT!!! ~~
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2005
  25. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    Well, on a Windows PC I would use:

    First and foremost, Deep Freeze -> with the "C" drive where Windows and the programs are always boot frozen (except for upgrades), plus another disk not frozen where I would save my documents.

    Then Kaspersky Personal Pro as the antivirus, with redundant database.

    Ewido Security Suite, as an additional scan on demand in case Kaspersky ever misses something.

    SpywareBlaster as a basic browser protection.

    As a matter of fact, that's what I use (not that I use only these, but I would keep these if I had to choose only four).

    EDIT: it must be noted that I'm behind a hardware firewall, however. If that was not the case and I still had to choose only four, I most definitely would take off SpywareBlaster and replace it with a personal firewall, like Sygate.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2005
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.