Yikes! Fare thee well, Unity 2D

Discussion in 'all things UNIX' started by vasa1, May 9, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. vasa1

    vasa1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Posts:
    4,417
  2. moontan

    moontan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    3,931
    Location:
    Québec
  3. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    10,221
    It will be supported for 5 years on lts, so that's good enough for now.
    Mrk
     
  4. vasa1

    vasa1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Posts:
    4,417
    Unity 3D is snappy for me on a 2009 Dell 1545 laptop. But then I don't compare FPS or whatever. In other words, no heavy graphics. My formula- and macro-heavy spreadsheets open quickly in Calc. Even editing spreadsheets in Google Docs is a joy. I was trying out 2D to see if I could notice it being "lighter". Can't say I notice much. It's back to 3D tomorrow.
     
  5. NGRhodes

    NGRhodes Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Posts:
    2,381
    Location:
    West Yorkshire, UK
    They are discontinuing unity-2d as a separate project. 2d support is planned be integrated with what is currently unity-3d.
     
  6. On the one hand, this doesn't sound so great for users of low-spec computers. On the other hand, Unity 2D is itself pretty sluggish, and really only pays lip service to the idea of running Ubuntu on low-spec computers.

    (FWIW: 12.04 with Unity 2D is slow as molasses on a Core 2 Duo workstation with 4 GB of RAM, which is not by any means what I'd call low-spec. The bloat is totally out of control.)

    I'm really a bit disturbed by the way major desktop distros (and desktop environment projects) are abandoning all pretense of running on low-powered hardware. Maybe I'm being sentimental... But one of the big reasons I migrated to Linux in the first place was that it could run - not badly, either - on a Pentium II desktop with 192 MB of RAM. And through most of high school I was using a Powerspec desktop with 128 MB of RAM, which Linux also ran quite well on. Expecting anything to run with less than 256 MB would be a bit much these days, but I'm still quite disappointed to see this OS getting so porcine that it can't run properly with 4 GB and a Core 2 Duo. It strikes me as bending quite unnecessarily to the industry's desire for planned hardware obsolescence.
     
  7. Trespasser

    Trespasser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Posts:
    1,204
    Location:
    Virginia - Appalachian Mtns
    Both Unity 2 and 3D run quite snappily on my HP 2.0 ghz laptop with 4 gigs of ram. It does have an nvidia video card in it, though. I guess it depends upon your hardware as to how well Unity runs.

    Later...
     
  8. moontan

    moontan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    3,931
    Location:
    Québec
    i found moving a windows fastly around was not as smooth as i'd like.
    of course, i can't complain because i'm using a 5 years old computer.

    but the graphic responsiveness is much better with Bodhi Linux, or Windows 7.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.