WinTasks Pro version number ?

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by FanJ, Dec 9, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    Hi,

    Could someone, who has WinTasks, please check for updates and see what it gets?

    I have WinTasks Pro version 5.04 installed.

    But when I click "Check for Updates" in WinTasks, then it tells me:
    "New WinTasks 5.03 available".
    See screenshot.

    I have tried to email them about a week ago, but no reply.
    I notified them again today.

    I'm not not completely sure whether it is something on my system or on their server.
    Something similar happened about 6 months ago, and then it seemed to be a problem on their end...

    Thanks in advance !
     

    Attached Files:

  2. SpikeyB

    SpikeyB Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Posts:
    478
    I get the same.

    wintasks jpeg.jpg

    I guess the problem must be at their end. I know their forum was down for a couple of days this week. I don't know if the two are connected though.
     
  3. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    Thanks SpikeyB, much appreciated !

    Well, I guess that we have to wait and hope they fix it ....
     
  4. Notok

    Notok Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Posts:
    2,969
    Location:
    Portland, OR (USA)
    I get the same thing here as well.. they must have forgotten to change the version number internally or something.
     
  5. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    Hi SpikeyB and Notok,

    Thanks for your replies !

    It looks to me it has been fixed (see screenie) ;)
     

    Attached Files:

  6. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    Hi SpikeyB and Notok,

    Not very important but may I please ask you to confirm that there was a new Process Library update, 5.030.01
    See screenie ;)

    Due to system problems on my side and connection problems, I'm not 100% sure at the moment whether it was indeed a new one.

    Thanks in advance !
     

    Attached Files:

Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.