Windows Defender Is Becoming the Powerful Antivirus That Windows 10 Needs

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Secondmineboy, Jan 30, 2016.

  1. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,675
    Location:
    USA
    They appear to be Microsoft files. It is nice of them to use Defender to tell us they are planting browser setting hijackers on our systems.
     
  2. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Posts:
    2,233
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    I know we're not supposed to post any results of VirusTotal or Jotti but what do those say about the files?

    Just curious if Microsoft is the only one "flagging" its own files or if there are copycat engines doing the same. :cautious:

    Edit: never mind. Prob. cleared by now.
     
  3. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,675
    Location:
    USA
    No detections. I didn't expect there to be. This is from the Dev channel on Windows 11. All I did was boot it and I started getting popups about these files. This VM is kept in a mostly clean state. Snapshots are created after a Windows update and any 3rd party software is removed by rolling back to the snapshot after testing.
     
  4. imdb

    imdb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Posts:
    4,208
    well, at least they're honest about it. :D
     
  5. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Posts:
    2,233
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    @itman --thank you for your response here concerning the vulnerable driver block list and HVCI. If HVCI is the same as Core Isolation/Memory Integrity, then yes, it's enabled on here with zero issues and my memory is over-clocked via xmp. I already got an answer on Malwaretips that OSA could not step in like the MS block list because it's "not as strong."

    My question to you or anyone is: does the vulnerable driver block list come automatically with Core Isolation/Memory Integrity on Windows Home version? It seemed in the MT discussion it could only be enabled on paid Windows versions. Perhaps I misread this. I hope I did.
     
  6. 3x0gR13N

    3x0gR13N Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Posts:
    850
    How to configure Defender updates frequency via GPEdit? I have windows updates set to notify before download, but for whatever genius reason MS treats Defender updates as regular Windows updates. I want to receive signature updates automagically, without bundling them with regular Windows patches.
    Attached Policy doesn't seem to work.

    EDIT: I forgot that I had my mobile network set as a metered connection, signatures are now downloaded on schedule set in GPEdit
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 30, 2022
  7. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Posts:
    2,233
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Has anyone experienced an absurdly fast Defender scan before? I can recall one such instance a few years ago that turned out to be some kind of bug but that's been long fixed.

    9 seconds is pretty short--it's usually around 30-45 seconds for the same amount of files. Just ran it again to see if it was repeatable. No, this time it was 8 seconds. Not complaining but it's a little off the track from the usual.

    defscan2.PNG
     
  8. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Posts:
    5,509
    I've never seen that one personally before.
     
  9. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,286
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    Never ever and that does not sound good.
     
  10. imdb

    imdb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Posts:
    4,208
    i'd seen it once or twice on 10 but haven't seen it on 11.
     
  11. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Posts:
    2,233
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    OK, thanks for replies. That's somewhat reassuring, imdb. Guess all one can do is keep an eye on it. Things like this, many people will likely report it if it's an anomaly.
     
  12. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,675
    Location:
    USA
    I've seen it before but I wouldn't worry about it unless it is an ongoing problem.
     
  13. imdb

    imdb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Posts:
    4,208
    yep, you got that right. :thumb:
     
  14. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,619
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    My 'quick scan' is usually under 2 minutes but always more than a minute...
     
  15. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,286
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    On Windows 10 desktop with slower HD, quick scan took 2:46 and reported 22,333 files scanned.
    On Windows 11 laptop (super fast everything), quick scan took 3:00 and reported 18,238 files scanned.

    So it appears my scans are longer than what members have reported.
     
  16. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,021
    Microsoft Defender's protective capabilities suffer offline
    https://www.ghacks.net/2022/04/22/microsoft-defenders-protective-capabilities-suffer-offline/
    --------------
    Malware Protection Test March 2022 - AV-Comparatives
     
  17. kC_

    kC_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Posts:
    580
    first quickscan after bootup is normally 2-3 minutes.....
    next quickscans are then 45-55 seconds (as I'm guessing it's smart enough to not rescan what hasn't changed) and maybe stores in memory....
    reboot again and quickscan 2-3 mins
     
  18. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,954
    just another pointless article on ghacks. running WD offline means windows running offline, both having no updates. by purpose admin(s) can provide updates via WSUS or similar.
    but this one is important:
    guess why. dont you think thats reason that market is fighted that hard?
     
  19. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,619
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    I did some tests out of curiosity, as reported in my post this morning my quick scan was under 2 minutes. Now, about 9 hours afterwards my quick scan lasted 50 seconds for 23,797 files. performing another quick scan a few minutes later, it lasted 19 seconds for 20,255files, which is almost as fast as plat1098 reported... Therefore it is possible that MS Defender might keep a record of previous scans if they are performed frequently enough... I usually have a quick scan once a month, therefore I've never noticed any discrepancy with scanning times.
     
  20. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,286
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    You are right- it must be keeping records. I just did the scan again on my desktop and what took 2:46 took 1:34 four hours later for the same number of files.
     
  21. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Posts:
    2,233
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    This is what I was wondering but couldn't find any documentation for. Your results sound about right, but clearly didn't happen for me. Just now it's 20 sec for 38658 items--about double. Nothing has changed software-wise from prev. Hmmm.
     
  22. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,606
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    No matter what others may say, I think this is a bit troubling especially from a technical point of view. Because this means that the locally based AV engine is garbage and all scanning including behavioral analysis is done in the cloud. M$ should really improve it and lately I have been reading more and more about hackers/malware being able to bypass Win Defender by simply disabling it.
     
  23. Antarctica

    Antarctica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Posts:
    2,180
    Location:
    Canada
    @Rasheed187, if what you say about how easy hackers can disable WD then it is scary:thumbd:
     
  24. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Posts:
    5,509
  25. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,387
    No, it is not, Rasheed has been ********** Microsoft Defender for years and always moving the goalposts.

    Microsoft Defender has been tested for years and it is been proved that its protection is on par or even better than many paid antivirus solutions; actually it is very easy to see how good Windows native security is now and how it was disruptive to third party security vendors and malicious actors.

    The problem is that he thinks that somehow an antivirus should be perfect, impenetrable, infallible, capable of proactively protecting against targeted attacks, but in real world and for home users its protection is more than fine; an antivirus is just one piece in a security strategy.
     
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2022
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.