Why some are OK as second anti-malware and others not?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Iangh, Jun 10, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Iangh

    Iangh Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Posts:
    611
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Immunet, Prevx, MBAM and SAS are happy to sit alongside a mainstream A-V.

    Why?

    I can understand 2 programmes pinging each other when checking for malware and therefore it isn't a good idea to run two A-V.

    What's so different about the aforementioned programmes that they are happy to co-exist with an A-V?

    Is it a technology difference (2 are cloud-based, 2 are resident) or a marketing position not to encourage a second anti-malware programme?

    Ian
     
  2. sg09

    sg09 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Posts:
    2,713
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
    May be because these have on-execution protection rather than on-access. But as far I know MBAM has on-access protection.
     
  3. Cudni

    Cudni Global Moderator

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Posts:
    6,956
    Location:
    Somethingshire
    it is the way they hook into the system in order to protect it. 2 AV will work in similar manner and hence clash while something like the other 4 you mentioned are designed differently (but they are not AV as such although Prevx is becoming more of a one and only Immunet free can be run in tandem because the Pro version is an AV that will clash with other)
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.