I am a bit of confused about the real need of Anti-Trojans. I have used first Kaspersky Personal Pro 4.0 and then F-Secure 5.40 as my backup Anti-Virus some half a year. During that period they detected some 10 trojans and backdoors. All that time I had Tauscan 1.6 as my Trojans detector, but when I made full scan to my PC after Kaspersky or F-Secure with Tauscan Anti-Trojan, it detected none such kind of infections. So I decided that a very good Anti-Virus is enough for me when it is capable to remove trojans and backdoors too. Can anyone show really independent tests were for example KAV, F-Secure, RAV or DrWeb are within with other most respected Anti-trojans in the market? PS. For me if someone detects 95% and the other 90 % isn't enough to convince me that I really need that kind of stuff, because it may still be within natural variation in that case! "The truth is out there, but it hurts" Best Regards, Firefighter!