who is using nero lite or micro??

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by zfactor, Jul 28, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,103
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    what features will i loose compared to ultra version when i only ever install the burning rom during installation and nothing else anyway?? will i be able to burn video dvd's (not encode them but simply burn them as a dvd video disc) and what about hd and dual layer support or is nero ultra needed for that?? i basically am interested in getting the burning rom and only using it to burn. i kinda miss their burning engine and want to try the newest version but i only want that part of the whole package. also which one would allow me to convert cd audio into mp3 and visa versa?? thanks
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2008
  2. Arup

    Arup Guest

    All the un-neccesary features, lite is far better, Nero of yesteryears.
     
  3. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,103
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    lol i know that im talking about the difference between lite and micro vs ultra feature wise for only the burning end of things
     
  4. Seer

    Seer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Posts:
    1,650
    Location:
    Singidunum
    yes

    no. you can burn even BlueRay with micro and lite

    for "vice versa" micro and lite are sufficient. From audio -> mp3 you'll need ultra

    cheers
     
  5. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,103
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    ^^ awesome info exactly what i needed to know thanks very much
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.