who is using nero lite or micro??

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by zfactor, Jul 28, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,013
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    what features will i loose compared to ultra version when i only ever install the burning rom during installation and nothing else anyway?? will i be able to burn video dvd's (not encode them but simply burn them as a dvd video disc) and what about hd and dual layer support or is nero ultra needed for that?? i basically am interested in getting the burning rom and only using it to burn. i kinda miss their burning engine and want to try the newest version but i only want that part of the whole package. also which one would allow me to convert cd audio into mp3 and visa versa?? thanks
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2008
  2. Arup

    Arup Guest

    All the un-neccesary features, lite is far better, Nero of yesteryears.
     
  3. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,013
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    lol i know that im talking about the difference between lite and micro vs ultra feature wise for only the burning end of things
     
  4. Seer

    Seer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Posts:
    1,596
    Location:
    Singidunum
    yes

    no. you can burn even BlueRay with micro and lite

    for "vice versa" micro and lite are sufficient. From audio -> mp3 you'll need ultra

    cheers
     
  5. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,013
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    ^^ awesome info exactly what i needed to know thanks very much
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.