Which one should I add?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Ohmy, Aug 3, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ohmy

    Ohmy Guest

    Hi,

    I'm using Defensewall right now,
    I know DW is the only software I need,
    but I would like to add either Avast! or Threatfire.

    Because I sometimes have to use IE as trusted,
    and I have the ActiveSkin issue for DW,
    so I'm thinking that I might need just one more software
    that will cover that.

    Which one is lighter?

    Any suggestions?

    Thanks!
     
  2. HURST

    HURST Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Posts:
    1,419
    Both are light.
    Both offer good protection.
    TF might be better due to zero-day protection.
    It depends how comfortable you feel by answering prompts. Although TF is very silent, you may have to make some choices every now and then.

    Personally, I would go with TF, advanced rules are very usefull. Look for threads and posts by Kees1958, he has very good know-how on TF.

    It could also be suggested that you use both, but it seems that you want to keep things light.

    I will search for an old thread on TF advanced rules, when I find it, I'll edit this post.


    EDIT: Take a look here

    ~~~
    [Off topic]
    With this post, 1 year and 14 days after I joined Wilders, I reached the 1000 posts mark, congrats to me:thumb:
    [/Off topic]
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2008
  3. Makav3l1

    Makav3l1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Posts:
    241
    My understanding is that defensewall is a hips program with sandboxing included. That being said, I would rather supplement it with a strong a/v like avira over adding another hips program in Threatfire to avoid conflicts.
     
  4. Ohmy

    Ohmy Guest

    Thanks :)
     
  5. hex_614

    hex_614 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Posts:
    155
    Location:
    Manila, Philippines
    go for AVG 8.0 + Norton AntiBot
     
  6. muf

    muf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Posts:
    926
    Location:
    Manchester, England
    No, it's not a sandbox. It lowers the privileges of files that come through your browser so that they don't have access to sensitive area's of your pc. I supplement it with Sandboxie but there is debate regarding whether there is any real benefit from doing this.

    That makes good sense, although I didn't do that because maybe I lack good sense. :blink:

    muf
     
  7. Makav3l1

    Makav3l1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Posts:
    241
    It is a policy based sandbox then? Like GeSWall.
     
  8. muf

    muf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Posts:
    926
    Location:
    Manchester, England
    I've never used GesWall, but reading the POC they appear very similar.

    muf
     
  9. HURST

    HURST Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Posts:
    1,419
    Indeed GesWall and DefenseWall are very similar. Same concept, almost same funcionality.
     
  10. Ilya Rabinovich

    Ilya Rabinovich Developer

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Posts:
    1,543
    Well, not really. GeSWall is using more virtualization. But, in general- base concepts are very close to each other.
     
  11. Someone

    Someone Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Posts:
    1,106
    Hi

    I agree with this!
     
  12. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,683
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    If you read the original post you it contained no mention of these programs.
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2008
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.