which is better nod32 or F-Secure in virus threat ??

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by 50000000, May 24, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    This is false. That was just a help explanation for a past test. "The levels are set for each test by the tester. Products that got the "standard"-level can be understood as products that based on our tests have a good on-demand detection rate of zoo-samples, "advanced" a very good on-demand detection rate and "advanced+" an excellent on-demand detection rate of zoo-samples. Such a classification was also set to the retrospective tests."
    As I do not want that peoples give to much importance on minimal differences in percentages, the levels were introduced; levels are generated by groups of detection classes for each single test.
     
  2. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    May i ask where you "heard" this? It would be good to supply at least a link instead of "I've heard". 4.5 is definitely slower, but it's still a nice anti-virus and i have both versions Btw. ;) :)

    Edit: I just realized you meant 4.5 versus F-Secure, thought you meant 4.5 versus 5.0. :D
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2005
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.