Which AV is it that you do not like?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by CJsDad, Apr 25, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    no, I dont think so, screwdriver.:eek:
     
  2. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    well i for one dont look at a test result or whatever and decide.

    sure, ive had lots of comments in the past for my past av experiences and of course, i still get ridiculed for my present av solution, but....

    i have used norton / f-secure / avg / trend micro and now drweb and no matter what you all think of each of these softwares, all have protected me, all have never let me down, this is pure fact, whether someone chooses to believe this or not. (i also do own a kaspersky licence but never used it, )

    so this brings curious wonderings about these testing websites etc etc, are they just propaganda?

    so if you look at things the way i do, and with past experiences that i have.... you choose an av on the way it performs for you, the way it performs on your machine and how you personally like the software,

    end of rant. :blink:
     
  3. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    how much you want to bet Chris, that Nod will come out smelling like roses next month at AV Comparatives. We will see.
     
  4. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    well you never know, trjam.
    but i wouldnt be too harsh and quick to judge, especially with the suite... its beta and its supposed to be flawed i suppose.

    i dont like to 'predict' things on testing sites, no point for me as i really dont count on them, but i think drweb will do better in the next on-demand, they are adding alot more signatures than they used to, last month brought an extra 30% compared to the previous month, and this month, has also been good in signature adding.
     
  5. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,530
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO

    What are you implying here?
     
  6. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Not implying anything, just a hunch lets say. Plus I like the smell of roses.:)
     
  7. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    I think Avira wil beat NOD32 by more than just a fraction of a percent in the next one.
     
  8. TonyW

    TonyW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,741
    Location:
    UK
    I've never liked NOD mainly because of the separate components. If they had built it all into one UI, that might have been different.
     
  9. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    What he's implying is pretty obvious Namor. But the same reasoning invalidates the results of ALL Av products tested then, doesn't it? :isay: :p
     
    Last edited: May 8, 2007
  10. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    easy way to stop all the bickering ;)

    dont read too much into test results, use what you like, enjoy and protects you.

    :rolleyes: *sigh*
     
  11. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    No bickering. Just extending trjam's logic to it's end point. ;)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.