Which antispyware program takes up less RAM???

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by cheater87, Sep 10, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cheater87

    cheater87 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Posts:
    3,125
    Location:
    Pennsylvania.
    Superantispyware free version or Adaware 2008 free versiono_O
     
  2. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
    SAS, when idle, it uses less than 1MB of RAM. When scanning, it may use between 60-70MB, but the CPU usage is very low and you can do everything else while performing a full scan.

    I don't know about Ad-Aware but I doubt that it uses less.
     
  3. arran

    arran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Posts:
    1,139
    wouldn't it be a better to have an antispyware program which detects the most??

    What good is a antispyware program that uses little hardware resources but fails to find all the malware on your pco_O

    if your worried about an antispyware program using to much ram when you are not doing scans etc why not disable it in your windows services??
     
  4. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
    SAS is better both in resource usage and detection
     
  5. arran

    arran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Posts:
    1,139
    and you can also make it so as SAS uses 0 Ram as in zero Ram by disabling it in administrative tools in the control panel by going into services.

    that said, I personally don't bother with any antispyware programs because nothing ever gets passed Sandboxie.
     
  6. EliteKiller

    EliteKiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Posts:
    1,138
    Location:
    TX
    A forum regular should not have to ask this question. ;)
     
  7. cheater87

    cheater87 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Posts:
    3,125
    Location:
    Pennsylvania.
    Well I have a friend who has very low ram and was wondering what program would be best. I tried looking at the program's sites for the system requirements but could not find them. Thanks for your help everyone. :)
     
  8. Doodler

    Doodler Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Posts:
    219
  9. Niels

    Niels Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Posts:
    466
    Location:
    Belgium
    Ad Aware 2008 free aawservice.exe used > 300 mb during scanning on my computer that only have 512 mb internal memory which resulted into an unresponsive computer. Even when I disable some scan settings the memory usage was very high.
     
  10. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    i think the winner is SUPERAntiSpyWare free and spyware terminator:thumb:
     
  11. EliteKiller

    EliteKiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Posts:
    1,138
    Location:
    TX
    SAS system requirements

    AAW 2008 system requirements
     
  12. PROROOTECT

    PROROOTECT Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Posts:
    1,102
    Location:
    HERE ...Fort Lee, NJ
    ANTI-MALWARES on my PC

    STARTED, IN WAIT :

    Use Memory:

    HazardShield : 33360 Kb
    MBAM: 23164 Kb
    Nemesis: 15776 Kb


    VM Memory:

    HazardShield: 26972 Kb
    MBAM: 17876 Kb
    Nemesis: 13664 Kb



    DURING THE SCAN :

    Use Memory:

    HazardShield: 31300 Kb
    MBAM: 29020 Kb
    Nemesis: 15864 Kb


    VM Memory:

    HazardShield: 28336 Kb
    MBAM: 21700 Kb
    Nemesis: 13720 Kb

    ... approximately ...

    ...and: SpywareBlaster: 0. Just.:cool:
     
  13. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    5,633
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    Given the hard fact that SAS goes above and beyond any other ordinary scanners to dig out the worse (and latest) malware, (rootkits, savage hijackers, etc.) i don't mind the taxing of my system from it's scan. Plus this AS is formidable in pulling out the worse of these malwares in addition to discovering them.

    That says a lot for a security scanner program because some if not most might find them, but the real payoff is that SAS also rips them out, so it's core makeup definitely has some unique technological blueprint in order to accomplish such a daunting task.

    I would venture to say even a manual removal could prove less then fulfilling compared to SAS's capabilities in many respects.

    I would say it's a fair trade-off, if any, for it's abilities to do what many if none others can do to rid an intruded machine of forced malware. Anyhow, thats how i view it.

    EASTER
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.