What was the most stable versin of 7.0

Discussion in 'Acronis True Image Product Line' started by h2ouup2, Nov 16, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. h2ouup2

    h2ouup2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    25
    Hi,

    What is the most stable version of 7.0? I recently had to do a restore, and can't remember which version of Acronis was the best. I searched the forms and can find very little out about build 638. To me it seemed like 597 was a good build. Anyway the reason I ask is because I don't want 20 archives that all say ok, then when I go to restore I have to try all 20 to find one good archive.


    I never upgraded to version 8 because I missed the free upgrade by one day!:'(

    I would upgrade to 9, but too many complaints so far, so I'm waiting....:doubt:
     
  2. Acronis Support

    Acronis Support Acronis Support Staff

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Posts:
    25,885
    Hello h2ouup2,

    Thank you for choosing Acronis Disk Backup Software.

    I regret to inform you that we are no longer able to provide technical support to customers who are using Acronis True Image 7.0 because we have released a new version and do not develop the old one anymore.

    I recommend you to download and install the free trial version of Acronis True Image 9.0 to see how the software works on your computer. You can find more information on how to use Acronis True Image 9.0 in the respective User's Guide.

    If you will be satisfied with work of the free trial version of Acronis True Image 9.0 then please visit Acronis online store to purchase the upgrade.

    In case you will encounter any problems while using the free trial version of Acronis True Image 9.0, please report them on this forum starting the new thread for each issue or submit a request for technical support. We will do our best in order to reslove any problems as soon as possible.

    Thank you.
    --
    Alexey Popov
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2005
  3. h2ouup2

    h2ouup2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    25
    Would I qualify for the upgrade price?
     
  4. Allen L.

    Allen L. Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    335
    Location:
    -Close-
    I'm using 7.00.634 on one computer and it seems very stable. However the last build is probably the best overall, at least in Aconis' opinion. 638 was the last one of series 7.

    ...Allen
     
  5. h2ouup2

    h2ouup2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    25
    7 works but I have to do what seems like 10 tries before I get an archive that is not corrupted. I have version 595, 613, 638 (but not 634). I guess I'll stick with 638.

    A restore from HDD to HDD (both internal) takes about 2 hours to restore a 25 GIG partition. --- Note version 613 is twice as fast as 595 or 638 don't know why but it is.

    I was hoping 9 would be faster but with the bugs I can't chance it.
     
  6. h2ouup2

    h2ouup2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    25
    Well I had a sucessful restore from an archive that was tested as good. It took almost 2 hours to restore. (19 GIG of data). This from an internal 2nd HDD.

    How long has your restore times taken?
     
  7. It'sme

    It'sme Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    Posts:
    52
    Location:
    Middle Earth, NZ
    I continue to use TI7 b638 and find it very stable.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.