What is your security without realtime Anti Virus setup?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Kees1958, May 1, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    whats in sig only and absolutley love it.
     
  2. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    3,348
    Location:
    Europe, UE citizen
    Multi layer defense ;). Basically, HIPS and sandboxing. And virtual surfing if needed.
     
  3. Yanick

    Yanick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    274
    Windows 7 x64 Home
    SpyShelter Firewall, ExeWatch, ThreatFire, Sbie (Paid), Emet 2.1.
    Hitman Pro, Emsisoft free scanner, Mbam Pro. 3 on-demand scanners.
    Windows in-built imaging.
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2012
  4. wtsinnc

    wtsinnc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Posts:
    943
    Running XP Home Edition SP-2 with IE 8.
    SBIE, Keyscrambler, Malwarebytes on-demand, and Comodo Time Machine- all freeware and WinPatrol Plus with real-time monitoring.
    Eraser for secure file deletion.
    Imaging via freeware versions of Macrium and Paragon.
     
  5. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    MBAM realtime is a blacklist based 'add-on', so do Wilders members count this as a naked setup yes/no :D
     
  6. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    I dont count it as naked if any AV or AM are running real time,its just titled differently.
     
  7. STONEMAN

    STONEMAN Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Posts:
    99
    Location:
    London,South Of The River
    Not in my book im affraid ;)
     
  8. Yanick

    Yanick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    274
    Okay, okay point taken! :D
    Realtime is disabled :D
     
  9. moontan

    moontan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    3,931
    Location:
    Québec
    not much really.

    running the Gufw front-end for the kernel firewall in Ubuntu 12.04

    NoScript anf Keepass.

    Terabytes IFW/IFD/IFL for imaging.
     
  10. Cyrano2

    Cyrano2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Posts:
    131
    Location:
    Spain
    Just Comodo Firewall in real-time, I really think is more than enough.
     
  11. lws

    lws Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Posts:
    196

    Sandboxie Pd., Private firewall, LUA.

    edit: No JRE or Adobe reader here either.
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2012
  12. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    Faronics Anti-Excutable:thumb: :thumb:
     
  13. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    If it weren't for the fact that I have to have a real-time antivirus enabled in order to connect to my work VPN, I wouldn't bother with real-time antivirus. I would just do occasional on-demand scans.

    For me, a combination of system-wide policy restriction (AppGuard) and system-wide virtualization (Shadow Defender) behind a router is enough real-time security. It provides silent but effective protection with no popups or decision making on my part.
     
  14. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    No AppArmor restrictions on access?
     
  15. moontan

    moontan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    3,931
    Location:
    Québec
    errr...

    that sounds like some complicated stuff that not doubt will allow me to trash my computer properly. :D
     
  16. Ashanta

    Ashanta Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Posts:
    702
    Location:
    Europe
    Shadow Defender + secure add-ons with FF
     
  17. flatfly

    flatfly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Posts:
    71
    I haven't had a single infection for the last 5 years, while surfing 8h+ per day on average, including online banking and trying lots of apps all the time, with the following setup (100% free!):

    LUA+google chrome+WOT+Tiny Watcher+HitmanPro+googDNS+winFW. NO IE, JAVA, NO ADOBE (most common threat gates). I also recently added the excellent little-known ExeWatch to my setup.

    Os: xp sp3
     
  18. Sordid

    Sordid Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2011
    Posts:
    235
    Yeah, awesome thread. The "what's your gear" threads are my faves.

    For Windows.

    32bit: Defensewall
    64bit: Comodo FWD+

    On demand if counting these:
    Hitman
    MBAM
    Norton Power Eraser
    McAfee GetSuspect

    Sandbox:
    SBoxIE

    CCleaner allowed to clean Temp <24hours

    Browser:
    Chrome Dev. C2P. No Java.

    Also like Safe Online browser components of Prev/Webroot, but they also by default include AV, so /nfm??

    Using The highly hated Trusteer Rapport on my dad's computer. Seems to be holding things down. Sometimes incompatible with Fox updates (what he uses). Biggest improvement was ditching Java for him. No, really.
     
  19. blasev

    blasev Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Posts:
    763
    Sandboxie + LnS + EMET

    random choice of portable internet browser -> sandboxed by sandboxie

    EAM on demand

    No Java, No Adobe, NO IE
    I can't put my self to try SRP, maybe I will someday ;)

    update : almost forgot, my other main protection is virtual machine running linux distro / windows 7
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2012
  20. Yanick

    Yanick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    274
    Why not try this? ;) -hxxp://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=297834#post1862599- It's SRP, but much more simpler and works with Starter and Home editions :)
    Via Parental Controls ;)
     
  21. blasev

    blasev Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Posts:
    763
    yes, I haven't tried that
    but it seems much simpler, will give it a go in the future

    thanks :thumb:
     
  22. Yanick

    Yanick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    274
    Yea it is :) it has whitelist function, very simple :)
    No problem ;)
     
  23. 1chaoticadult

    1chaoticadult Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Posts:
    2,342
    Location:
    USA
    Comodo Firewall & Defense+ Sandboxie and HitmanPro.
     
    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  24. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    I have asked it before and will do it again. Using Parential Control as an executable control is really a brilliant way to use this. It deserves its own thread with a small setup guide. Who has the time and knowledge to post?

    Combined with the deny unsigned programs elevation of UAC (through registry) makes a super solid security setup (and super light) within hand reach of every Win7 Home owner.

    So who shows how it is done?
     
  25. kupo

    kupo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Posts:
    1,121
    I used to use Parental Control as anti-exe. But I noticed this behavior in my box.
    1. You can't install a software in your Standard User even if you allow the setup and run as administrator. (I can't remember if an error will show up or nothing will happen.)
    2. To install on an admin account, if you are currently logged in as Standard User, you must restart and log in to your admin account. If you just logged off, the same thing will happen in case 1.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.