What is your security setup these days?

what will adding this do? I mean what will happen if I should add this?

 

I use HTTPS Everywhere and HTTPS Finder. Do I need to add this? Thanks for the tips by the way

 

Indeed it does.

 

Have you reported the FP's to HitmanPro?

 

I also use HTTPS Everywhere, but I still left the rule intact. I added that rule because of this.
Try your Firefox with this:
-https://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/browser/mixedcontent/assets/woodgrove.htm

Without that rule in NoScript, Firefox will warn you about mixed content. If you click to load, your input will be logged.
With that rule in NoScript, Firefox will NOT load the un-encrypted content.
EDIT:NOTE: Scripting must be allowed for this test. (So you can say that you are safe with NoScript
I don't know what will happen if HTTPS Everywhere is installed in that test. (I haven't tried it yet, )

You can do a lot of things with ABE, read through the NoScript forums or ask them a question. I think someone is developing an extension (similar to RequestPolicy) that makes it easier to create ABE rules.
Here it is -http://forums.informaction.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=8059&sid=8905fabe070ac32b026df8fffbad5514
Or you can learn how to use ABE here
-http://noscript.net/abe/index.html
(I really don't know how to use it, I just used a rule created by a member of NoScript forums which is also a member of Wilders, I can't remember )

Only .yahoo.com yimg.com yahooapis.com login.yahoo.com will load in .mail.yahoo.com .mail.yimg.com

 

I don't necessarily think they are false positives.

 

Then why not submit them to HMP for further analysis?

 

The program has been removed from my computers... there is nothing to submit.
My own further analysis was to upload each executable to VT and Jotti.
A sufficient number of vendors (besides those on HMP) deemed the files to be malicious.
At that point I don't need more analysis.
Others might, but I had all the info I needed.

 

Ah! Now I understand. But how can add more rules for many more websites? ABE is really useful. But I don't know how add rules and even make them.

 

So 4 out of 42 from Virus Total is a sufficient number ?
HMP is not capable of FP's ?
BTW MBAM found nothing.
Not saying they may not be malicious, I just have my doubts.
I'll take care of submitting them to HMP. (out of curiosity)

 

I believe I said VirusTotal and Jotti each showed from 3-7 vendors reporting virus.
HMP is not capable of FP's? Did I say that?
I'm well aware that MBAM found nothing.
Neither did VIPRE.
As for your doubts, good for you.
I had mine too, only they were about the file's integrity, not their maliciousness.
Everyone has doubts.
As for submitting them yourself... good idea. You should have done that first thing.

 

geswall development is dead

 

Trying Bitdefender IS 2012...it's been 2-3 years since running and I must say it is lighter than I remember...very light in fact and 3pc for $14.99 ain't bad! Thanks for the tip!

 

I would say further developement of geswall is dead,but at least the free license can be used for another what 10 yrs or so if am not mistaken.

 

i wanted to see if they have a new version but nothing there

 

You did, I said 4, after I checked both VT and Jotti.

No you did'nt, I was simply asking a question.

Ok, I did not know if you were aware of it sense you mentioned nothing about that in your other post.

Ok

So which is it, the file's integrity or the possibility that they are malicious?

Done

I would had I discovered this before reading your post on them, I was merely asking a question about if you submitted the files in question.
I did not mean to offend you in any way, again I was just asking.

 

Not a problem. See PM.

 

And I forgot to mention, prior to the HMP alerts on the two SpyReveal executables, when I tried going to the SpyReveal website from within the program's GUI, TrafficLight put up this warning...

 

Traffic light looks pretty cool and Gigantic. I actually dont need glasses to read that.

 

LOL @ Gigantic!

 

Online Armor 5.5 Free

 

DefenseWall 3.18
Shadow Defender 1.1.0.325

Macrium Reflect ~ System Explorer ~ SeconfigXp ~ AdMuncher

[SIZE="+"]GMER ■ SpyReveal ■ Trojan Remover ■ HitMan Pro
DrWeb CureIt ■ Malwarebytes ■ AVZ Antiviral Toolkit
[/SIZE]
OpenDNS ~ Opera
Ghostery
TuneUp Utilities ■ CCleaner

 

AppGuard
EMET
Shadow Defender 3.25

All web surfing in shadow mode.

 

I might go to it again if Avira can't get a handle on their 64 hidden objects issue involving a Windows update soon.

 

Good Evening ! Installed Bitdefender I.S.2012 and WSA Essentials. Both in Real Time. Sincerely...Securon