What is your security setup these days?

But not perfect =p

yet! haha

 

I say keep changing until you get the right setup for you. I personally I won't be changing anytime soon. I'm satisfied with my setup. Although I do have one more possible setup I might try soon

I will have the perfect setup tomorrow lol

 

After a long time using this setup on my notebook:

Sandboxie, Mamutu, Look'n'stop, Hitman Pro, WOT

I switch to " in my sig".

On my Desktop I was using Outpost SS 7.5.1 but I wasn't satisfied and have replaced it with Emsi Anti-malware.

I'm waiting for the perfect combo in my opinion:
Panda Cloud Pro 2.0, Mamutu, Hitman Pro.

 

Just FYI the latest Chrome/Chromium doesn't support that flag anymore.

 

Someone may get angry but in my opinion OA++ is 10 times better than Outpost SS these days.
The only problem that OA has are some bugs that persist some time.

P.S. I would exchange my Outpost Security Suite 7.5.1 license for Sandboxie year license. If no one is interested i would give it away to someone from this Thread.

 

Haven't used either.

 

I'm not running latest Chromium. And, won't be updating anytime soon. Do you happen to have an official page where I could read more why the flag was killed?

I'm trying to find, but so far nothing.


Thanks

 

I had an one year license for Outpost Security Suite and gave it away. To me it is very buggy and severely effects the performance on my laptop on windows 7 x64.

 

I can't find the commit. Apparently it was just too much work, it kept breaking things.
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=16118

 

Giving the Panda a rest and trying out the new Webroot SecureAnywhere AV beta along with Online Armor Premium. So far its very tight and light...

 

Oh no the dancing panda is gone

 

Not gone but in his house til he learns a few more dance steps...

 

Sorta testing Comodo DNS... can't really tell if it's working. I have it on my router.

 

Here's one from the Blocked Sites page, which as you can see, is still being blocked by Comodo.
Again, until they come up with a test page, this is the simplest method.

 

Ah, thanks, that site was blocked.

 

I know it was blocked... that's the warning I got when I went there before posting the screenie.
Just keep pasting the urls they report on that thread until one shows up as blocked.
Pitiful way to have to check, but it works.
By the way, so you're saying that ipconfig /all won't tell a user if it is working, just that it is configured as DNS server, that it?
(I know you have it on your router, I'm talking about users who have their network connections configured).

 

Yeah =p I just wasn't even sure if Comodo DNS was running properly.

If you run ipconfig /all it'll show you your DNS servers, which will confirm that you've set Comodo as yours. But it won't actually show if it's working if you never see a legitimate blocking. It may be blocked by some browser settings or who knows what - it's nice to have confirmation.

 

I installed a new firewall last night and decided to check the Norton test page (I was running Norton DNS at the time). It came back "Your computer is not currently using Norton DNS", which caught me by surprise. I reset it and checked again and all was well. So I agree, it's nice to have conformation.

 

Yup. I think Comodo should get on that.

 

I think I'll switch to Norton DNS.

edit:
There's norton, norton, and comodo

 

They have a test page.
We need someone to test Comodo and Norton.

 

It's easy to bump them up or down on the list, according to which one I feel like using.
Takes 10 seconds.
Comodo on top, Norton on bottom in this current image...

 

Network
DDWRT Router running recommended build
DDWRT firewall turned on
MVPS Host File stored on router for network wide adblocking
Google DNS

Realtime Protection
Mamutu Behavioral Blocker
Beta updates
Paranoid Mode On
Multiple applications gaurded
Allow program if 90% of community members allowed it.
Deny program if 90% of community members allowed it.
Behaviors of "learned programs" that aren't explicitly allowed are denied. This means that if any program is hijacked it is default-denied any suspicious behaviors that the legitimate program hasn't already asked for.

Comodo Firewall and Defense+ 5.8 Beta
(Password Protected)

Comodo Firewall: Safe Mode, Alert Settings Low
-- Ports Stealthed
-- Enable IPv6 filtering
-- Do Protocol Analysis
-- Block Fragmented IP datagrams
-- no monitoring NDIS protocols other than TCP/IP

Comodo Defense+: Safe Mode
-- Autosandbox disabled
-- Force Java into Limited Sandbox, clean it out once in a while
-- Force Digsby, Skype into Partially Limited sandbox
-- Force Vaio Event Service/ Battery Manager and IE9 into Partially Limited sandboxes

System Hardening -- Windows 7 64bit Ultimate
UAC on Max
EMET: DEP Opt Out, SEHOP Opt Out, ASLR Opt In. All internet facing applications forced to run with EMET.dll and a few others as well.
Downloads folder and all contents forced at Low Integrity
NiNite for updating
Disabled some services
As few programs installed as possible. Only what I need and when I'm done with something it gets uninstalled and I make sure that everything is gone.
Digsby and MiPony's .exe's set to LowIL.

Browser -- Chrome Dev
Block 3rd Party Cookies
Built in malware protection/ download scans
Default PDF reader -- no adobe necessary

Backup Browser -- None, IE9 is removed

Portable On Demand Scanners/ Tools -- USB Drive
TDSS Killer
JavaRa
RKILL.com
AVZ4
Dr Web Cureit
SuperAntiSpyware Portable
Hitman Pro
Emsisoft Emergency
Ninite for updating

 

Here is an example of how I secure applications with Mamutu.

As you can see everything is blocked except for the two boxes necessary for me to run the program.

This is the way I have most of my programs - and if any of them are attacked they're very limited.

 

Hahaha. He better hit the dancing classes soon then