What is your security setup these days?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by dja2k, Dec 15, 2005.

  1. DoctorPC

    DoctorPC Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2014
    Posts:
    810
    I think I got a setup that offers near guaranteed protection, including a high degree of hacker proofing. (I hope)

    Attached is a picture of my network at home as it currently sits. The Security Appliance has an active malware system, as well as deep packet inspection. The SOHO Wired Router is functioning as a switch, but with Trend malware inspection. The wireless one has no SSID BC, QOS enabled, and IntrusionD/SPI activated as a layer for wireless devices. My home network averages 15-25 devices connected. Most are secured. All of the wireless devices are encrypted. The VOIP PAP2 has advanced admin modes on, with long form passwords and unique names, with NAT enabled (by default they do not). Most of the wireless devices have additional firewall protection, and malware/intrusion type software (varies by device). Privacy policies are NOT accepted on any device in the home. (OPTOUT)

    In addition to that setup, individual computers have - in layers;

    1) Locked down, Secured, Privacy Oriented trimmed up Windows 8.1.
    2) Malware Website Check via/Adblock (just the malware check)
    3) Malware/Phishing/Scam Website checks via Adguard (system wide)
    4) Malware Website scanning via Chicalogic/MBAM.
    5) File Protection - Chicalogic/MBAM.
    6) Heuristics+Machine Learning Checks via IMMUNET3
    7) Appguard System Control

    I cannot say with 100% assurances I am malware proof, but I would GUESS I am, and will try a purposeful infection test again soon. The last one I tried with 100 malware domain links and not a single one made it. Anyone attempting hacks would find many layers to get through, most exploits plugged up. In addition they may get through one network appliance, but they'd run into another layer after that.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 15, 2014
  2. bberkey1

    bberkey1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Posts:
    244
    Location:
    United States
    Starting to prepare a new set up for testing and was thinking of changing the the following current setup for a lighter feel:

    Winpatrol Plus
    Windows Firewall
    Avast 2014
    MBAM
    EMET
    Sandboxie

    I was considering swapping winpatrol for NVT ERP, which would serve as a harder HIPS approach, but i really like the registry watch and start up program notice of winpatrol. What are people's feelings towards WP and NVT. NVT has gotten so much praise so I am interested (and will most likely buy a license regardless), but again I have enjoyed WP for some time.

    Sandboxie is a must so I will keep that regardless, but the rest is up for debate as i read through seemingly endless posts in this thread and read people's opinions on some other options regarding NVT and compatible programs with minimal overlap.
     
  3. KaptainBug

    KaptainBug Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2013
    Posts:
    480
    If you are using sandboxie free version then there is not enough benefit in running EMET. EMET won't protect applications inside sandboxie.
     
  4. bberkey1

    bberkey1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Posts:
    244
    Location:
    United States
    So I've read. It's one of the programs I was planning on dropping as a result. Also the past incompatibilities of past Avast/SB editions almost caused it to fall as well, but the latest builds seem to remedy most problems.

    However I see a lot of folks not relying on any real time Av with programs like NVT or Applocker so i will give that some thought as well
     
  5. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,883
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
    @DoctorPC

    :thumb: Nice network/security setup. How much time and effort does it take to maintain this setup?

    hqsec
     
  6. justenough

    justenough Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Posts:
    1,549
    It's like Page42 says, Sandboxie and some other stuff. I run a light AV sometimes but haven't had any problems in the past few years when not running an AV with Sandboxie. EXE Radar Pro would be a good decision, and/or you could try AppGuard or VoodooShield. Definitely keep MBAM if only for on-demand scans. With Sandboxie I look for the lightest possible layers that are strong to go with it.
     
  7. bberkey1

    bberkey1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Posts:
    244
    Location:
    United States
    I've Always loved MBAM, its served me well. NVT looks exciting I can;t wait to give it a go around.
     
  8. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,941
    Location:
    USA
    Precisely! :cool:
     
  9. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,941
    Location:
    USA
    I suppose I do tend to say that from time to time.
    It definitely denotes the importance I place on the non-Sandboxie layers. ;)
     
  10. guest

    guest Guest

    FleischmannTV actually has a point. Chrome's sandbox and Sandboxie's sandbox have different scope of protection...

    By reading today's trending, I would be pretty confident to say that the infection was more likely happened via the stereotypical method: a user initialized the infection, with s/he realizes it or not. Chrome's sandbox can't protect you from that, Sandboxie's can. But if the user initialized the execution outside of Sandboxie's sandbox, then that'd be the same story. In a nutshell, the problem is how the user executes what.

    Sorry, got to justify it to maintain the balance of the universe. :p
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 15, 2014
  11. Securon

    Securon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Posts:
    1,960
    Location:
    London On
    Good Evening! Re-Installed ESET S.S.7...in tandem with WSA Security Plus...and AppGuard...and HMP Alert 2.5...Sincerely...Securon
     
  12. justenough

    justenough Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Posts:
    1,549
    Those are some powerful programs. Today I installed NOD32 again to run with Sandboxie. Probably my favorite setup.

    ESET NOD32 and ESET Smart Security are free at the moment at newegg:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...er=BESTMATCH&Description=eset&N=-1&isNodeId=1
     
  13. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,941
    Location:
    USA
    I'm going to go there one day before the year is out.
    I have a couple copies of NOD32 and when VIPRE gets ready to expire, hello NOD32. :thumb:
     
  14. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    8,626
    I've added the current beta of Baidu Antivirus to my setup.

    Now I have Baidu, Ikarus and Malwarebytes all as on demand scanners.
     
  15. Rompin Raider

    Rompin Raider Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,254
    Location:
    Texas
  16. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    do we allo_O:D
     
  17. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    8,626
    I just ditched Ikarus due to not liking the user interface.

    Now to find something else for my second antivirus...
     
  18. DoctorPC

    DoctorPC Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2014
    Posts:
    810
    No time once setup. The Security Appliance polls hourly for malware/phishing updates. Once it is configured, it's ready. The Soho wired polls once a day for TrendNet updates, once setup, it's automated. The only thing I really need to do is manually add the MAC address of any new devices we get since I have MAC filtering enabled. I know MAC filtering isn't a huge boost to protection, but even a 2-3% improvement is something I consider given how easy it is to add the MAC's for wireless devices.

    So that's it really. I do a weekly security audit that takes me about an hour. There is an hourly automated audit on the system. That has found intrusion attempts. Only 2 devices I have had intruded on, and that was before the illustrated system was fully in place. Someone was turning on and off my smart-tv to ~snipped~, then a couple days later someone hacked my VOIP PAP2, and fudged up the settings. I increased protections since then, dropping everything behind a security appliance, and boosted the internal FW/SEC on the PAP2, as well as long form PW protection. PAP's generally come WITHOUT anything enabled, and even default passwords - I learned the hard way on that one. Your VOIP provider says 'we got it all set for you!' of course leaving the password blank, and the logic Admin.. Nice job guys!

    Somewhere around here I got photos of my setup, it's pretty nice. I had custom tables built by a company that builds computer tables for universities. Really sweet, got em shipped in from Texas.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 16, 2014
  19. DoctorPC

    DoctorPC Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2014
    Posts:
    810
    Here is one of my 'stations'. Right now I have 2 lan gaming stations with 3 PC's each. Each one is half of hexagon table (custom), so each gamer can't see the screen of the person next to them. Monitors are all 22", PC's are at the minimum Quad Core 3.2's with 8-16GB of Ram, and GTX 6XX series or better.

    In the picture you can see the Black Knight SOHO Wireless in the center, and the Motorola Surfboard Extreme to the left. The Security Appliance, and Wired SOHO router are hanging in custom baskets suspended from the bottom of the table. Picture on wall is Signed Leroy Neiman Lithograph of Ali vs Holmes, worth a few thousand. I used to have lan nights every week, but rarely these days. <sniff>
     

    Attached Files:

  20. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,883
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
    Looks nice :) :thumb:

    hqsec
     
  21. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    8,626
    I just tried Avetix, which uses BitDefender's scan engine. Scanning a folder of malware was lightning fast, but detected nothing. I looked again at the program's interface and it was prompting me to check for updates - it comes with no definitions! It took over an hour to do the initial update. After which, it did detect malware, but the detection rate was unremarkable.
     
  22. G1111

    G1111 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Posts:
    2,294
    Location:
    USA
    Had to bite the bullet and get a new machine. Unfortunately it is 64-bit and I cannot run my beloved DefenseWall.

    Windows 7 Professional SP1 x64

    Firewall:
    NAT Router (Password Protected)
    Look’n’Stop Firewall 2.07 (Phant0m’s Ruleset)

    Anti-Virus:
    Emsisoft Anti-Malware 8.1.0.40

    Blocking/Hardening:
    VoodooShield 1.30
    MBAE 0.10.0.1000
    SpywareBlaster 5.0 (Ad-Aware custom blocking list)
     
  23. justenough

    justenough Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Posts:
    1,549
    WSA with Sandboxie is my other favorite. I can't choose between two favorites, sign me up for your AV rehab. :)
     
  24. Rompin Raider

    Rompin Raider Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,254
    Location:
    Texas
    Technically I use the same (WSA & Sandboxie)....Dr. Bo would disown me if I didn't keep SBIE loaded or on standby!:argh:
     
  25. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    6,039
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
    No need to go to AV rehab. WSA and Sbie are good. Use both. :thumb: And Rompin, don't make Bo angry. Make sure Sbie stays.:D
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.