What do you recommend running AntiVir's heuristics at?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by mvdu, Sep 14, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,151
    Location:
    PA
    I run it at medium because high produced too many false positives. I would continue at medium unless enough recommend changing to high anyway.
     
  2. Arup

    Arup Guest

    I have all set to high........no issues with some occasional FPs.
     
  3. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,151
    Location:
    PA
    Most of my false positives happened to be at websites (HTML/Malware,) though I haven't done a full scan on high.
     
  4. Arup

    Arup Guest


    Same here.............
     
  5. bellgamin

    bellgamin Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    5,648
    Location:
    Hawaii
    High detection level in all cases. FPs are VERY rare.
     
  6. entropism

    entropism Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Posts:
    337
    high detection in all cases, haven't had an FP in over a year now. I have to be honest, I browse some shady stuff, and I've never been infected or had an FP, I have to wonder if either I'm doing something very right, or very wrong. :p
     
  7. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    Here also.
    Almost no FP.
     
  8. Someone

    Someone Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Posts:
    1,106
    I agree.
     
  9. virtumonde

    virtumonde Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Posts:
    501
    I ran the free version for almost an year on high.The only FP's i seen ware reported here by other users and not by my browsing activity,or from something from my pc.
     
  10. deanmartin

    deanmartin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Posts:
    231
    Location:
    USA/KY
    Same Here.
     
  11. Waterfox

    Waterfox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Posts:
    118
    Location:
    Sweden
    Heuristics at medium in both scanner and guard.
    Got some problems when I had them set on high (few FP's) and changed it back to the recommended settings. :)
     
  12. vijayind

    vijayind Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Posts:
    1,413
    I use medium... it works for me.
    Have a HIPS ( right now trying out Mamutu ) to ensure nothing gets past.
     
  13. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,056
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    I have used Avira for three years and I recommend you set heuristics to high for every module.
     
  14. Mongol

    Mongol Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Posts:
    1,581
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Likewise and ditto here...:cool:
     
  15. Fajo

    Fajo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Posts:
    1,812
    I run on High here.. if I trust a website and it gets flagged I normally send a mail to Avira and add it to my exclusions if I trust it well enough.
     
  16. QBgreen

    QBgreen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2005
    Posts:
    627
    Location:
    Queens County, NY
    Scheduled full scan at high, all other on access (guard, web, mail) at medium.
     
  17. ggf31416

    ggf31416 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Posts:
    314
    Location:
    Uruguay
    Both Scanner and Guard to High.
     
  18. mnosteele

    mnosteele Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Posts:
    183
    Location:
    Chesapeake, VA USA
    I always set to the highest level and very few false positives.

    :)
     
  19. hex_614

    hex_614 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Posts:
    155
    Location:
    Manila, Philippines
    medium only for me.
     
  20. Macstorm

    Macstorm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,531
    Location:
    Sneffels volcano
    Just raised it to 'high' from my ever regular 'medium' setts. I'll see how it goes.
     
  21. Boost

    Boost Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Posts:
    1,293
    Set to HIGH with no false positives.
     
  22. Fajo

    Fajo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Posts:
    1,812
    Basically the only FP's I have ever seen is from Keygens or from Crackers. even tho they are not a virus the AV is somewhat right in detecting them due to the fact the programs normally have back door's into them because of how they are compiled. ;)

    And before its said. No I don't use illegal software but when my legal copy of the CD goes kaboom the torrent I find. Always has a damn kegen with it and my AV picks it up as a virus 90% of the time. :doubt:
     
  23. virtumonde

    virtumonde Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Posts:
    501
    True:).But if u want 99% FP's on keygens go with avg:).Sometimes i think that they have a special department to scare the users from illegal software and to write those silly detections.
     
  24. Fajo

    Fajo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Posts:
    1,812
    Norton used to flag stuff to crack its own program as No Good Hack tool. always found that funny.

    As said before a lot of it is in the way the Keygen is compiled same with cracks.
     
  25. JasSolo

    JasSolo Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Posts:
    414
    Location:
    Denmark
    If you want to get rid of those FP's, simply use Eset Smart Security. It's smart enough to see that keygens it's not viruses ;) . Or better yet, don't use keygens at all.....simply buy your favorite software and keep people in their jobs :)


    Cheers
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.