Urgent Warning on New Virus

I was just on Castle Cops forum or website and found this. Now I dont know how bad or serious this is but I'm not taking it lightly either. Looks like another nasty one is on the loose and ready to destroy more PC's unless somthing is done about it ASAP by both MS and AV companies.

Also as I use NOD32 and Bitdefender Pro 9 on two seperate PC's I'm not sure if any of these AV companies have found a cure or update for this.

Here's the link:

http://www.castlecops.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=index

BTW I've also posted this topic in the NOD32 section on this forum.

 

We setup a forum for Ilfak (he hosts) concerning hexblog and his tools:

http://castlecops.com/f212-Hexblog.html

 

New results i think? from av-test

These detected all the wmf samples
* BitDefender
* Computer Associates eTrust-VET
* F-Secure
* Kaspersky Lab
* McAfee
* Eset Nod32
* Microso OneCare
* Sophos
* Symantec

These missed just one file:

* Alwil Avast
* Clam AntiVirus
* Aladdin eSafe

These tools missed a number of samples (total in parentheses):

* Fortinet (1
* AntiVir (24)
* eTrust-INO (25)
* Panda (25)
* Ikarus (26)
* Norman (26)
* Ewido (47)
* AVG (59)
* VirusBuster (61)
* QuickHeal (63)
* Trend Micro (63)
* Dr Web (93)
* VBA32 (110)
* Authentium Command (119)
* F-Prot (119)

 

OK, at least I now know that VBA and Kaspersky are completely different. Didn't someone once point out a few months ago that VBA and Kaspersky signatures were almost similiarly updated.

PS: Nice to see that the bigger name (niche) AV's like NOD32 and KAV have gotten their act out quickly

 

Antiviruses that detect by heuristics seem to be matching more variants than those soley based on signatures.

I'm surprised at Dr. Web.

 

Interesting new results. Good job from Computer Associates eTrust-VET!

However two others really dissapointed me:
* Panda (25)
* Trend Micro (63)
They were on top of it with the first samples, now they're lacking behind. Also F-Prot showed very weak in this threat (119 missed). I really hope to see an table with updates times on this threat from the different vendors. Nothing better then a real-life test
But I feel save, BitDefender got 100% in both tests (without the need of patches troll).

 

Do we have confirmation that CA's VET engine is detecting all known variants?

 

As far I know, the test contained all the know variants till date (206)? Or did I misunderstood?

 

ya it has all the known variants

sorry i didnt post earlier i was a at a highschool party