µBlock, a lean and fast blocker

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by gorhill, Jun 23, 2014.

  1. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    Call me crazy but the 'dream team' for me is uBlock on default settings with Admuncher installed. Ridiculously fast, and stops a LOT including the heuristic based Admuncher engine which stops a ton of crap.

    This is my go-to combo now.
     
  2. TomAZ

    TomAZ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2010
    Posts:
    1,131
    Location:
    USA
    Thought I'd revisit this as I don't recall seeing any response. Any thoughts?
     
  3. Kharom

    Kharom Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2015
    Posts:
    7
    I tested Ad Muncher once upon a time, but was less than satisfied with the insertion of everything and your mother into the HTML source in order to hide elements through CSS.

    Another 'feature' I wasn't very fond of is the tool's way of inserting itself between every application's http-based network traffic by default. Exclusions could be configured of course, but Ad Muncher was a total unknown to me at the time and its source code is not available.

    Back then it made a lot of sense to use an external application to filter ads and unwanted content, because compiled code had a distinct advantage over browser extensions or userscripts. More powerful hardware and an increase in efficiency of today's JS engines have almost made that a moot point however. I was content to use Proxomitron and later on Privoxy instead of the widespread extensions like AdBlock Plus, but gorhill's focus on efficiency has made me reconsider. The idea of content filtering introduced in uBlock 0.4 is the kind of intelligent design I adore.

    So what's the advantage of using Ad Muncher in combination with uBlock? Don't the two different content blockers/filters add an unneeded overhead to every webpage? Have you changed the Ad Muncher settings to alleviate that?

    I would only consider that duo a viable option, if it was possible to a) disable the CSS page insertions by Ad Muncher since uBlock is clearly better suited to that task and b) if it was possible to use host-based filter-lists in Ad Muncher. Due to my lack of familiarity with the tool I don't know if either can be done.
     
  4. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,387
    µBlock with 3rd party frames blocked by default and some filters is all that you need, it is very safe and fast.
     
  5. wolfrun

    wolfrun Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Posts:
    708
    Location:
    North America
    I am using the setup as seen here, post 696 https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/ublock-a-lean-and-fast-blocker.365273/page-28

    Correction on the bottom line was mean't to read as follow re post 696:
    As of right now I am only using µBlock with Dynamic filtering with FF in Sandboxie and no problems so far. Low memory and pages load fast. I guess it's up to you if you want to run noScript along with it as added protection. Personally, I'm quite satisfied with the setup the way I have it.
     
  6. wolfrun

    wolfrun Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Posts:
    708
    Location:
    North America
    Totally agree. Although I am using Dynamic filtering as well.
     
  7. NSG001

    NSG001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Posts:
    682
    Location:
    Wembley, London
    @gorhill
    Version 0.9
    Thanks for enhanced network logging, very useful indeed.:thumb:
     
  8. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    Admuncher is written entirely in assembly, and is very speedy. But what I like is it's sort of heuristic engine for Webbugs, and the ability of it to find compromising scripts. The fact that Admuncher ignores HTTPS web pages means I can't run it exclusively, but I like the combo together, it's fast, and seem to work in tandem very well. I notice a ton of heuristic web-bug stops by Admuncher that otherwise seem to go untouched by filter based products like uBlock.
     
  9. The Red Moon

    The Red Moon Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Posts:
    4,102
    i use ublock with google chrome and ublock has updated to 0.9.0.0.
     
  10. khanyash

    khanyash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Posts:
    2,438
    Mine still hasn't updated.
     
  11. khanyash

    khanyash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Posts:
    2,438
    Anyway I uninstalled & installed the latest version.

    Hope it autoupdates the future version.
     
  12. umue

    umue Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Posts:
    8
    I linke ublock very much, in Chrome it is my new Standard Ad Blocker. But in Firefox I have a Problem with it. My Firefox Start Side is Speeddial within 4 News Sides. ABP is able to block Ads there, but ublock cannot do this. Is there any Possibility to configure ublock to do the same job there like ABP?
     
  13. JimboW

    JimboW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Posts:
    280
    uBlock is great but even better alongside uMatrix. I'm on a Chromebook so uBlock blocking 3rd party iframes and the necessary filters alongside uMatrix giving HOST files and spoofing user-agent, referrers, hyperlink auditing etc. is amazing. Really top quality work here.
     
  14. gorhill

    gorhill Guest

    What does "side" mean? If by "side" you mean "tab", then it's just a matter of turning on uBlock for that tab. The "New tab" is whitelisted by default, just turn on uBlock while on the "New tab" tab.
     
  15. DOSawaits

    DOSawaits Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2008
    Posts:
    469
    Location:
    Belgium
    umue probably meant the slides, the preview windows (thumbnails) when in Enhanced or Classic Mode for the new tab, the small "preview" windows that get generated for the most visited sites there.
     
  16. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    Why Peter Lowe default in uBlock? Peter states on his website he is no longer supporting it.

    Also - SPAM404 doesn't work in uBlock. I turn it on, and then enter specific websites on the spam404 list and they come through.
     
  17. WildByDesign

    WildByDesign Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Posts:
    2,587
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    I am a regular user of Peter Lowe's ad blocking lists, but personally haven't seen any mention of Peter no longer supporting it. His list is updated several times per month. Do you have a link or quote? The reason why I ask is because I rely quite heavily on his list. Or are you possibly referring to the fact that Peter stated that he doesn't add individual subdomains to his list? That would be a concern for extension users, I imagine, but good and efficient list in particular for DNS level filtering whether it's using BIND, DNSmasq, etc.
     
  18. gorhill

    gorhill Guest

    uBlock, just like ABP, doesn't not block root documents.
     
  19. gorhill

    gorhill Guest

  20. umue

    umue Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Posts:
    8
    the preview windows in the SpeedDial tab, how DOSawaits has described, are "adfree" when I am using ABP in Standard Configuration. By using ublock or Adguard ads are no longer blocked in the preview tab, though I switched it on at the Speeddial tab.
     
  21. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    Anyone notice uBlock via Easylist broke viewing attached img files on Wilders?

    Just started today.
     
  22. JohnMult

    JohnMult Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Posts:
    143
    Location:
    Greece
    No such problem. Only in page https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/without-a-ngfw.374183/ the attachment has the name advert.png and advert causes ublock to activate filter /advert-
    In other attachments that I try there was no problem
     
  23. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    Yeah I noticed that, but was too busy to come back and post why it was blocking. Simple KeyWord block.
     
  24. cooperb21

    cooperb21 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Posts:
    71
    Is it just me ore does blocking seem inconsistent sometimes ill search on google.ca and it will only load 1 and then sometimes 2 searching the same thing. Adblock and adblock plus will always block 2.
     
  25. khanyash

    khanyash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Posts:
    2,438
    How can I download ublock for Firefox?

    Update - Got it from the official site.

    Is it stable version for firefox?
    Does it autoupdates for firefox?

    It is not remembering options changed.
    I unticked "make use of context menu"
    After Firefox restart, the option is ticked again?

    What ublock protects by default like ads, malware, phishing, etc... i.e what are included by dafault in ublock?

    Why on Firefox addons page, quite an old version & not latest version?
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2015
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.