TuneUp Utilities 2010

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by abu shofwan, May 18, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. abu shofwan

    abu shofwan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Posts:
    358
    Location:
    Earth
    Has anyone experiences about TU2010 ? Pros and Con :rolleyes:

    I read some review of TU2010 and mostly they said its not better than TU20009 :doubt:
     
  2. Narxis

    Narxis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Posts:
    477
    It's good, never used before so i don't know about the oldern versions but the 2010 version is doing it's job.:thumb:
     
  3. denniz

    denniz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Posts:
    431
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    After using TU2009 for a year, the new layout of TU2010 does need getting used to. But after a while it's easy to navigate.

    TU2010 :thumb:
     
  4. icr

    icr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Posts:
    1,588
    Location:
    Mumbai
    I have used Tune up right ver 2008 to 2010 and I find the version 2010 much better(more configurable)
     
  5. Matthijs5nl

    Matthijs5nl Guest

    I did like TU2010 a lot. But after a while I realised Windows 7 + CCleaner + Defraggler does the job perfectly well for me.
     
  6. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,041
    I used every version except 2010 - there are better products out there. I found the support very slow in responding and not that great so I moved on


    I now use Fixit instead
     
  7. abu shofwan

    abu shofwan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Posts:
    358
    Location:
    Earth
    installed on virtual environment.

    I don't like Live Optimizations Module.:doubt: It make program lauch little bit slow. I opened many programs and that module looks like confusing :D to increase response rate.

    Rescue center / back up worked like a charm.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.