Trojan Zlob

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by ugly, May 27, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 8 of 15
  1. TonyKlein

    TonyKlein Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,361
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Well, what it at least proves is that it may be easy for us to express criticism, but that effective, real world detection of this stuff is very difficult indeed...

    I trust you've submitted samples to all concerned?
     
    TonyKlein, Jun 10, 2006
    #176
  2. TonyKlein

    TonyKlein Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,361
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    ... and I can confirm this; about to call it a day....

    Complete scanning result of "mcodec-v5.541.exe", received in VirusTotal at 06.10.2006, 19:14:08 (CET).

    Antivirus Version Update Result
    AntiVir 6.35.0.10 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Authentium 4.93.8 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Avast 4.7.844.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    AVG 386 06.09.2006 no virus found
    BitDefender 7.2 06.10.2006 no virus found
    CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 06.10.2006 (Suspicious) - DNAScan
    ClamAV devel-20060426 06.09.2006 no virus found
    DrWeb 4.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-InoculateIT 23.72.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-Vet 12.6.2250 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ewido 3.5 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Fortinet 2.77.0.0 06.09.2006 suspicious
    F-Prot 3.16f 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ikarus 0.2.65.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 06.10.2006 no virus found
    McAfee 4781 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Microsoft 1.1441 06.10.2006 no virus found
    NOD32v2 1.1591 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Norman 5.90.21 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Panda 9.0.0.4 06.10.2006 Suspicious file
    Sophos 4.06.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Symantec 8.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    TheHacker 5.9.8.157 06.10.2006 no virus found
    UNA 1.83 06.09.2006 no virus found
    VBA32 3.11.0 06.09.2006 no virus found

    Aditional Information
    File size: 69982 bytes
    MD5: adec9d1b4e3c00b58d1297a6b39cad21
    SHA1: 960c796905310e8efc180a6c99c0c593e9bfdcdb

    omplete scanning result of "xpassman-v3.541.exe", received in VirusTotal at 06.10.2006, 19:14:34 (CET).

    Antivirus Version Update Result
    AntiVir 6.35.0.10 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Authentium 4.93.8 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Avast 4.7.844.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    AVG 386 06.09.2006 no virus found
    BitDefender 7.2 06.10.2006 no virus found
    CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 06.10.2006 (Suspicious) - DNAScan
    ClamAV devel-20060426 06.09.2006 no virus found
    DrWeb 4.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-InoculateIT 23.72.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-Vet 12.6.2250 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ewido 3.5 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Fortinet 2.77.0.0 06.09.2006 suspicious
    F-Prot 3.16f 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ikarus 0.2.65.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 06.10.2006 no virus found
    McAfee 4781 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Microsoft 1.1441 06.10.2006 no virus found
    NOD32v2 1.1591 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Norman 5.90.21 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Panda 9.0.0.4 06.10.2006 Suspicious file
    Sophos 4.06.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Symantec 8.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    TheHacker 5.9.8.157 06.10.2006 no virus found
    UNA 1.83 06.09.2006 no virus found
    VBA32 3.11.0 06.09.2006 no virus found

    Aditional Information
    File size: 76369 bytes
    MD5: 931abf1b4335bf2966663bf15b528ef9
    SHA1: c8a89c1e6f660aaac17156af8dbcbe73682eb1ed
     
    TonyKlein, Jun 10, 2006
    #177
  3. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    Well yes of course it is, but that's exactly the point, and that's exactly why I don't trust all these marketing BS about detection and/or priorities. These guys are part of a crime ring, one of the most notorious on the Internet, and they keep fooling AVs every day, and this is not a priority? What's next, since they can't keep up, are they going to consider their "applications" legitimate? Please.

    No, just to KAV and BOClean, as they're the ones I use.

    EDIT: now to Ewido, too.
     
    TNT, Jun 10, 2006
    #178
  4. TonyKlein

    TonyKlein Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,361
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I've submitted my samples to everyone, as I'm sure there will be folks who are NOT running either Kaspersky or BOClean, but who are at the same time still interested in having their AV/AT/AS protect them from this pest. :D

    (BTW, this IS still a Nod32 forum, y'know...)

    As I said before, IMHO there's no place for favoritism where computer security is concerned
     
    TonyKlein, Jun 10, 2006
    #179
  5. Benvan45

    Benvan45 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Posts:
    556
    There were 6 detections here and all put into Quarantine and deleted, but not logged in the 'Threat Log'. Shouldn't it be logged, so it could be copied?

    threatlog.JPG
     
    Benvan45, Jun 10, 2006
    #180
  6. Benvan45

    Benvan45 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Posts:
    556
    Nod.JPG

    This is the Quarantine!
     
    Benvan45, Jun 10, 2006
    #181
  7. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,166
    Location:
    PA
    Kudos to NOD32 and KAV for keeping up with this.

    I've submitted to NAV and McAfee with no answer. When I pressed the issue with McAfee, they actually called the file clean.
     
    mvdu, Jun 10, 2006
    #182
  8. TNT

    TNT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Posts:
    948
    Uhhmmm... yeah, in fact I think it's kind of... you know... time for the continuation of this thread to be moved to the "trojans and backdoors" forum. :D

    I've been supporting Kaspersky and Ewido for a long time for a simple reason: they always show excellent support and customer care. I've sent a lot of samples to both and they were always very responsive and paying attention to including the signatures. In a few instances when KAV found that the sample was not actually malware, they always answered. In 2004, the team behind Ewido even gratified me with a free 3-months "full" key for my activity in sending malware samples and communicating URLs to them. :)

    I have been using BOClean for only a couple of months, but Kevin McAleavey's support was very fast and reliable as well.

    I can't say the same for a few of the other vendors (this doesn't include Eset, my contacts with them have been too sporadic to really judge). So no, I won't support a few of the other vendors anymore.

    I don't gain any money at all doing this, I just do it because I hate to see the Internet becoming the junkyard it's becoming. I've been regularly using on the Internet since 1995 and I can tell you that it's NEVER been worse than it is now. And for what it's worth, big companies with large funds that are supposed to 'protect' users but actually spend more money in marketing than actual research and support won't have my help at all. Simple.
     
    TNT, Jun 10, 2006
    #183
  9. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    there are 2 variants still not detected as TonyKlein stated. We're waiting. :D
     
    pykko, Jun 10, 2006
    #184
  10. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    276
    Location:
    Romania
    New one :ninja: .

    new.JPG

    Sent it.
    It's like a neverending story.
     
    ugly, Jun 10, 2006
    #185
  11. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    yes.... since an heuristic is not available the story will be long. :D
     
    pykko, Jun 10, 2006
    #186
  12. TonyKlein

    TonyKlein Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,361
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Could actually be identical to the ones I uploaded. Second time I tried DrWeb had indeed added detection.

    It would help if you posted the entire scan results (including filename, file size + checksums)
     
    TonyKlein, Jun 10, 2006
    #187
  13. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Actually, I'll thank *everyone* who has detected these Zlobs. Eset has, till now, done the best job of it. Great job, and keep it up. Rumpstah was right when he said there were lots of talented people at Eset even since NOD32 version 1 :)

    As for McAfee, use WebImmune to send the sample and put in a note with the sample name as detected by other AVs like NOD32 and Kaspersky. Doing it this way has always worked for me.

    BitDefender tells me they will add these Zlobs "soon" :doubt:
     
    Firecat, Jun 10, 2006
    #188
  14. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,166
    Location:
    PA
    Actually, I did use WebImmune. That's when I finally got the answer that it is clean when other scanners said differently.

    I'm still using KAV, but NOD32 has been up to their level on this one. As you might know, I have licenses for both AVs.
     
    mvdu, Jun 10, 2006
    #189
  15. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    276
    Location:
    Romania
    New scan results

    zl.JPG
     
    ugly, Jun 11, 2006
    #190
  16. biggerbyte

    biggerbyte Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Posts:
    53
    Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Zlob.qz was detected on my computer by Kaspersky's online scanner, but NOD32 did not catch it, much less remove it.

    This must be all something very recent. Some antivirus is ready to detect it and some not. I'm surprised that Kaspersky beat NOD to the punch. Mine was in my restore files of all places. I simply turned off system restore long enough to do a scan and all was well. This was all very strange.
     
    biggerbyte, Jun 11, 2006
    #191
  17. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,174
    Location:
    Denmark
    A few more added to the 1.1592 update
    Win32/TrojanDownloader.Zlob.RE
    Win32/TrojanDownloader.Zlob.RF
    Win32/TrojanDownloader.Zlob.RG
    Win32/TrojanDownloader.Zlob.RH
     
    Brian N, Jun 11, 2006
    #192
  18. TonyKlein

    TonyKlein Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,361
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Here are 5 I just downloaded; I've stopped submitting this stuff... :p

    DrWeb got em all this time, KAV's a close second

    Complete scanning result of "mediacodec-v4.107.exe", received in VirusTotal at 06.11.2006, 12:36:32 (CET).

    Antivirus Version Update Result
    AntiVir 6.35.0.10 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Authentium 4.93.8 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Avast 4.7.844.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    AVG 386 06.09.2006 no virus found
    BitDefender 7.2 06.11.2006 no virus found
    CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 06.10.2006 (Suspicious) - DNAScan
    ClamAV devel-20060426 06.09.2006 no virus found
    DrWeb 4.33 06.11.2006 Trojan.Popuper
    eTrust-InoculateIT 23.72.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-Vet 12.6.2250 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ewido 3.5 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Fortinet 2.77.0.0 06.11.2006 suspicious
    F-Prot 3.16f 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ikarus 0.2.65.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 06.11.2006 Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Zlob.sd
    McAfee 4781 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Microsoft 1.1441 06.11.2006 no virus found
    NOD32v2 1.1592 06.11.2006 no virus found
    Norman 5.90.21 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Panda 9.0.0.4 06.10.2006 Suspicious file
    Sophos 4.06.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Symantec 8.0 06.11.2006 no virus found
    TheHacker 5.9.8.157 06.10.2006 no virus found
    UNA 1.83 06.09.2006 no virus found
    VBA32 3.11.0 06.11.2006 no virus found

    Aditional Information
    File size: 69934 bytes
    MD5: f384890c76fc8d17cc41f7184a9cb62a
    SHA1: 54631b137b8dfb5f4ddcb03d5a456860ae6fafe2

    Complete scanning result of "sv-codec-v4_01a.exe", received in VirusTotal at 06.11.2006, 12:36:46 (CET).

    Antivirus Version Update Result
    AntiVir 6.35.0.10 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Authentium 4.93.8 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Avast 4.7.844.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    AVG 386 06.09.2006 no virus found
    BitDefender 7.2 06.11.2006 no virus found
    CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 06.10.2006 (Suspicious) - DNAScan
    ClamAV devel-20060426 06.09.2006 no virus found
    DrWeb 4.33 06.11.2006 Trojan.Popuper
    eTrust-InoculateIT 23.72.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-Vet 12.6.2250 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ewido 3.5 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Fortinet 2.77.0.0 06.11.2006 suspicious
    F-Prot 3.16f 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ikarus 0.2.65.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 06.11.2006 Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Zlob.sd
    McAfee 4781 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Microsoft 1.1441 06.11.2006 no virus found
    NOD32v2 1.1592 06.11.2006 no virus found
    Norman 5.90.21 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Panda 9.0.0.4 06.10.2006 Suspicious file
    Sophos 4.06.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Symantec 8.0 06.11.2006 no virus found
    TheHacker 5.9.8.157 06.10.2006 no virus found
    UNA 1.83 06.09.2006 no virus found
    VBA32 3.11.0 06.11.2006 no virus found

    Aditional Information
    File size: 69936 bytes
    MD5: e3c795eeb01dc1c19d3ef22aee0c380c
    SHA1: aedc2f7aaae8ddd16f196c48be5ad4dc6ba214bf

    Complete scanning result of "mcodec-v5.541.exe", received in VirusTotal at 06.11.2006, 12:36:17 (CET).

    Antivirus Version Update Result
    AntiVir 6.35.0.10 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Authentium 4.93.8 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Avast 4.7.844.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    AVG 386 06.09.2006 no virus found
    BitDefender 7.2 06.11.2006 no virus found
    CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 06.10.2006 (Suspicious) - DNAScan
    ClamAV devel-20060426 06.09.2006 no virus found
    DrWeb 4.33 06.11.2006 Trojan.Popuper
    eTrust-InoculateIT 23.72.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-Vet 12.6.2250 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ewido 3.5 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Fortinet 2.77.0.0 06.11.2006 suspicious
    F-Prot 3.16f 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ikarus 0.2.65.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 06.11.2006 Trojan-Downloader.Win32.Zlob.sd
    McAfee 4781 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Microsoft 1.1441 06.11.2006 no virus found
    NOD32v2 1.1592 06.11.2006 no virus found
    Norman 5.90.21 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Panda 9.0.0.4 06.10.2006 Suspicious file
    Sophos 4.06.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Symantec 8.0 06.11.2006 no virus found
    TheHacker 5.9.8.157 06.10.2006 no virus found
    UNA 1.83 06.09.2006 no virus found
    VBA32 3.11.0 06.11.2006 no virus found

    Aditional Information
    File size: 69934 bytes
    MD5: 8d72a7c9c07e40b085c15bdcc9a1100f
    SHA1: be5f0dc0ffd852fe5d6b1747ba0b32b75a2d52d4

    Complete scanning result of "vcodec_ver3.102.exe", received in VirusTotal at 06.11.2006, 12:38:56 (CET).

    Antivirus Version Update Result
    AntiVir 6.35.0.10 06.10.2006 TR/Drop.Zlob.FN.2
    Authentium 4.93.8 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Avast 4.7.844.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    AVG 386 06.09.2006 no virus found
    BitDefender 7.2 06.11.2006 no virus found
    CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 06.10.2006 no virus found
    ClamAV devel-20060426 06.09.2006 no virus found
    DrWeb 4.33 06.11.2006 Trojan.Popuper
    eTrust-InoculateIT 23.72.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-Vet 12.6.2250 06.09.2006 Win32/Beovens.DR
    Ewido 3.5 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Fortinet 2.77.0.0 06.11.2006 W32/Zapchast!tr
    F-Prot 3.16f 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ikarus 0.2.65.0 06.09.2006 Trojan.Win32.Zapchast
    Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 06.11.2006 Trojan.Win32.Zapchast
    McAfee 4781 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Microsoft 1.1441 06.11.2006 no virus found
    NOD32v2 1.1592 06.11.2006 a variant of Win32/TrojanDownloader.Zlob.OU
    Norman 5.90.21 06.09.2006 Zapchast.FB
    Panda 9.0.0.4 06.10.2006 Trj/Zapchast.BY
    Sophos 4.06.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Symantec 8.0 06.11.2006 Trojan.Zlob
    TheHacker 5.9.8.157 06.10.2006 no virus found
    UNA 1.83 06.09.2006 no virus found
    VBA32 3.11.0 06.11.2006 Trojan.Win32.Zapchast

    Complete scanning result of "xpassman-v3.541.exe", received in VirusTotal at 06.11.2006, 12:39:36 (CET).

    Antivirus Version Update Result
    AntiVir 6.35.0.10 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Authentium 4.93.8 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Avast 4.7.844.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    AVG 386 06.09.2006 no virus found
    BitDefender 7.2 06.11.2006 no virus found
    CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 06.10.2006 (Suspicious) - DNAScan
    ClamAV devel-20060426 06.09.2006 no virus found
    DrWeb 4.33 06.11.2006 Trojan.Popuper
    eTrust-InoculateIT 23.72.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-Vet 12.6.2250 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ewido 3.5 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Fortinet 2.77.0.0 06.11.2006 suspicious
    F-Prot 3.16f 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ikarus 0.2.65.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 06.11.2006 no virus found
    McAfee 4781 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Microsoft 1.1441 06.11.2006 no virus found
    NOD32v2 1.1592 06.11.2006 no virus found
    Norman 5.90.21 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Panda 9.0.0.4 06.10.2006 Suspicious file
    Sophos 4.06.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Symantec 8.0 06.11.2006 no virus found
    TheHacker 5.9.8.157 06.10.2006 no virus found
    UNA 1.83 06.09.2006 no virus found
    VBA32 3.11.0 06.11.2006 no virus found

    Aditional Information
    File size: 76318 bytes
    MD5: fb89f7a1b6033b6399bdc156f3df542e
    SHA1: 05df94038bf37c37b6ed0ff6ace693d769e30fd3


    Files available on request (only to developers)
     
    TonyKlein, Jun 11, 2006
    #193
  19. TonyKlein

    TonyKlein Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,361
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    ...as I noticed there had just been a Virus signature database update, I updated and scanned the files with Nod32 AH. No change.
     
    TonyKlein, Jun 11, 2006
    #194
  20. TonyKlein

    TonyKlein Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,361
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Oh, lookie, here's one detected by noone at all... LOL!

    hxxp://www.pornmagpass.com/download/pornmagpass_ver1.107.exe

    Complete scanning result of "pornmagpass_ver1.107.exe", received in VirusTotal at 06.11.2006, 14:13:19 (CET).

    Antivirus Version Update Result
    AntiVir 6.35.0.10 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Authentium 4.93.8 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Avast 4.7.844.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    AVG 386 06.09.2006 no virus found
    BitDefender 7.2 06.11.2006 no virus found
    CAT-QuickHeal 8.00 06.10.2006 (Suspicious) - DNAScan
    ClamAV devel-20060426 06.09.2006 no virus found
    DrWeb 4.33 06.11.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-InoculateIT 23.72.33 06.10.2006 no virus found
    eTrust-Vet 12.6.2250 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ewido 3.5 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Fortinet 2.77.0.0 06.11.2006 suspicious
    F-Prot 3.16f 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Ikarus 0.2.65.0 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Kaspersky 4.0.2.24 06.11.2006 no virus found
    McAfee 4781 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Microsoft 1.1441 06.11.2006 no virus found
    NOD32v2 1.1592 06.11.2006 no virus found
    Norman 5.90.21 06.09.2006 no virus found
    Panda 9.0.0.4 06.11.2006 Suspicious file
    Sophos 4.06.0 06.10.2006 no virus found
    Symantec 8.0 06.11.2006 no virus found
    TheHacker 5.9.8.157 06.10.2006 no virus found
    UNA 1.83 06.09.2006 no virus found
    VBA32 3.11.0 06.11.2006 no virus found

    Aditional Information
    File size: 88070 bytes
    MD5: c9c2773545b170074f9d3a7452e5060d
    SHA1: ec19033d62683697362323e181caed55acd0389d
     
    TonyKlein, Jun 11, 2006
    #195
  21. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    I've seen it before but you were faster posting the scanning log. :p Files sent anyway. Hope NOD32 will react soon. :D
     
    pykko, Jun 11, 2006
    #196
  22. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,174
    Location:
    Denmark
    Quick Heal thinks it's suspicous ... But then again, it thinks all files are suspicious if they are runtime packed.. bah! :p
     
    Brian N, Jun 11, 2006
    #197
  23. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    They should actually be detected upon extraction, we're just looking into why archives are not detected.
     
    Marcos, Jun 11, 2006
    #198
  24. i_kenefick

    i_kenefick Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Posts:
    135
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    I wonder if this has anything to do with the FSG packing.
     
    i_kenefick, Jun 11, 2006
    #199
  25. TonyKlein

    TonyKlein Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,361
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Quoting:

    :D
     
    TonyKlein, Jun 11, 2006
    #200
Page 8 of 15
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice