Today we see AMD release three new high-performance quad-core desktop processors.

Discussion in 'hardware' started by HURST, Jul 2, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HURST

    HURST Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Posts:
    1,419
    http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=2154
     
  2. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,065
  3. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,124
    Hmmm. AMD is really dieing. Unless the puma survives than AMD is gone for sure.
     
  4. computer geek

    computer geek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Posts:
    776
    I agree, they did a test on a phenom once, and it lost at speed+generally all round to a core2duo. E6600
     
  5. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,639
    I hope theyre able to make some competitive processors cuz Intel is currently kicking their butt.
     
  6. chris2busy

    chris2busy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Posts:
    477
    and our wallets :S


    why don't they get it? L2 cache is not just for decoration...2Mb is not competitive at all
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2008
  7. Arup

    Arup Guest

    Whats strange is unlike Intel which uses the slower on board memory controller, AMD has on die memory controller and yet they loose out to Intel on benchmarks.
     
  8. tgell

    tgell Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Posts:
    1,097
    I think they bit off more than they could chew with the ATI aquisition.
     
  9. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    But that ATI acquisition proved good for them as now it is the largest profit making division of AMD.....on the graphics front AMD has a great year ahead since the Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 simply make NVIDIA's GeForce GTX series pointless.....

    As far as CPUs are concerned, I think AMD has to lie low for a while and concentrate on the mid-range and performance segments rather than the enthusiast segment. Aggressive pricing is the only way AMD can survive at all at this stage.
     
  10. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    They don't lose out on memory-limited benchmarks.....But they're slower in terms of pure execution. And thats the problem: efficiency. Like I said, they severely need to focus all their efforts for the mid-range and performance segment for a while till they can get their act together.
     
  11. Arup

    Arup Guest

    Attached Files:

    • Pi1.png
      Pi1.png
      File size:
      25.9 KB
      Views:
      179
  12. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    See here and here for more info :)
     
  13. dmenace

    dmenace Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2006
    Posts:
    275
    AMD processors generally use more power than intel ones despite offering inferior performance. AMD needs to improve in this respect as well.

    On a side note, if AMD does perish, who will motivate intel to create faster processors...
     
  14. Arup

    Arup Guest

    If AMD perishes the world will be left at the mercy of Intel's mediocrity like it was in the earlier 486 and Pentium days, same goes for ATI and Nvidia.
     
  15. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Posts:
    1,124
    Don't forget overpriced products :D.
     
  16. Arup

    Arup Guest


    Indeed and end of Moore's law.
     
  17. tgell

    tgell Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Posts:
    1,097
    AMD Hit With Another Huge Writedown:

    Article
     
  18. sosaiso

    sosaiso Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Posts:
    601
    Granted, they're probably just taking a hit to goodwill. It's a noncash item that will not affect much really. It's just re-emphasizing that AMD overpaid for ATI. Doesn't affect AMD's cash flows, which are more important for R&D and new products.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.