ThreatFire 4.6.0.4 Beta

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by guest, Aug 21, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. guest

    guest Guest

    http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Popup-Ad-Spyware-Blockers/Cyberhawk.shtml

    http://www.pctools.com/forum/showthread.php?t=58940
     
  2. andyman35

    andyman35 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    2,336
    This looks to be a very interesting update.:thumb:
     
  3. Sportscubs1272

    Sportscubs1272 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Posts:
    341
    So the 'kill this process' is similar to the block/deny feature in Mamutu? I assume this feature is automatically on?
     
  4. dell boy

    dell boy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Posts:
    240
    Location:
    uk, england
    has problems with previous threatfire in final versions, so i feel a beta would be very problematic.
     
  5. Sportscubs1272

    Sportscubs1272 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Posts:
    341
    I have tried TF in the past and it seemed to slow things down a bit. I use OA and Antivir Premium so I really don't need another security program. The final build of Cyberhawk wasn't bad though. I have been using Mamutu on my Vista laptop and it seems to run better in my opinion.
     
  6. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,890
    Location:
    Canada
    i am testing this one and it is diferent from the older version;)
    just wonder if they are using a malware black list at all or just by beahabiour?thanks
     
  7. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    They're using a black- and a whitelist for the user's convenience, but the behavior of everything that happens always comes first. Once malicious behavior is exhibited, it can ask these lists for guidance - without any guidance there's a prompt for action, and not just letting things pass by.
     
  8. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,890
    Location:
    Canada
    thanks;)
     
  9. thathagat

    thathagat Guest

    hey jmonge you sig shows TF...Mamutu and the big daddy of them all Prevx....is that a happy co-existence ?
     
  10. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,890
    Location:
    Canada
    it is like a mini-hips without database:D i guez:D
     
  11. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,100
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    not when they all start alerting.;)
     
  12. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,890
    Location:
    Canada
    this is a happy familly here:D but i have threatfire(beta) for testing purpose cause i know the bulldog is watching the gates(prevx),also mamutu is a good complament for just in case,mamutu for me is like mini-malware defender:D but still good :thumb:
     
  13. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    2,650
    same here - last final, all options ON and some of my own for the registry.
    working was not like charm - although i dont blame TF for all.
    i'm testing mamutu2 now and it works visible smarter than TF.
    i am looking forward to TF again when 4.6 goes final. :thumb:
     
  14. Toby75

    Toby75 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Posts:
    480
    A deny option? Easter would be proud!
     
  15. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    Finally! It's just a beta but still. I want my TF back on 64bit system.
     
  16. guest

    guest Guest

    i am just trying
     

    Attached Files:

  17. guest

    guest Guest

    ~Virus Total link removed per Policy.~
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2009
  18. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    So... did it successfully detect all the traces and keep track of them - taking care of the rogue completely?
     
  19. guest

    guest Guest

    it looks like successfully detect.
    i scan after the restart with prevx, nothing dedected.
    but i am playing new with this versiyon and malware, i dont test fully, i cant say %100 blocked
    ~Off topic comment removed~
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2009
  20. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    If you want to make a very deep determination, you could always also scan with Hitman Pro, SAS and MBAM apart from Prevx. ;)
     
  21. guest

    guest Guest

    Hitman Pro>> it found 1.tmp on temp folder but no active process.
    i think its not good test methodology. but its quick.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2009
  22. LagerX

    LagerX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Posts:
    563
    I really like new warning pop-ups etc :) :thumb:
     
  23. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    You check what that tmp-file belonged to by looking at the details? There you can see the defs. given by its engines. ;)
     
  24. Zimzi

    Zimzi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Posts:
    289
    Does anybody have problems with starting Firefox or Internet Explorer using Threatfire 4.6.0.4 Beta?
     
  25. 2good

    2good Guest

    Not one bit both start fine.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.