ThreatFire 4.6.0.4 Beta

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by guest, Aug 21, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. guest

    guest Guest

    http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Popup-Ad-Spyware-Blockers/Cyberhawk.shtml

    http://www.pctools.com/forum/showthread.php?t=58940
     
  2. andyman35

    andyman35 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    2,336
    This looks to be a very interesting update.:thumb:
     
  3. Sportscubs1272

    Sportscubs1272 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Posts:
    340
    So the 'kill this process' is similar to the block/deny feature in Mamutu? I assume this feature is automatically on?
     
  4. dell boy

    dell boy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Posts:
    240
    Location:
    uk, england
    has problems with previous threatfire in final versions, so i feel a beta would be very problematic.
     
  5. Sportscubs1272

    Sportscubs1272 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Posts:
    340
    I have tried TF in the past and it seemed to slow things down a bit. I use OA and Antivir Premium so I really don't need another security program. The final build of Cyberhawk wasn't bad though. I have been using Mamutu on my Vista laptop and it seems to run better in my opinion.
     
  6. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    i am testing this one and it is diferent from the older version;)
    just wonder if they are using a malware black list at all or just by beahabiour?thanks
     
  7. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    They're using a black- and a whitelist for the user's convenience, but the behavior of everything that happens always comes first. Once malicious behavior is exhibited, it can ask these lists for guidance - without any guidance there's a prompt for action, and not just letting things pass by.
     
  8. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    thanks;)
     
  9. thathagat

    thathagat Guest

    hey jmonge you sig shows TF...Mamutu and the big daddy of them all Prevx....is that a happy co-existence ?
     
  10. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    it is like a mini-hips without database:D i guez:D
     
  11. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,057
    Location:
    North Carolina
    not when they all start alerting.;)
     
  12. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    12,883
    Location:
    Canada
    this is a happy familly here:D but i have threatfire(beta) for testing purpose cause i know the bulldog is watching the gates(prevx),also mamutu is a good complament for just in case,mamutu for me is like mini-malware defender:D but still good :thumb:
     
  13. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    1,732
    same here - last final, all options ON and some of my own for the registry.
    working was not like charm - although i dont blame TF for all.
    i'm testing mamutu2 now and it works visible smarter than TF.
    i am looking forward to TF again when 4.6 goes final. :thumb:
     
  14. Toby75

    Toby75 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Posts:
    480
    A deny option? Easter would be proud!
     
  15. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    Finally! It's just a beta but still. I want my TF back on 64bit system.
     
  16. guest

    guest Guest

    i am just trying
     

    Attached Files:

  17. guest

    guest Guest

    ~Virus Total link removed per Policy.~
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2009
  18. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    So... did it successfully detect all the traces and keep track of them - taking care of the rogue completely?
     
  19. guest

    guest Guest

    it looks like successfully detect.
    i scan after the restart with prevx, nothing dedected.
    but i am playing new with this versiyon and malware, i dont test fully, i cant say %100 blocked
    ~Off topic comment removed~
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2009
  20. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    If you want to make a very deep determination, you could always also scan with Hitman Pro, SAS and MBAM apart from Prevx. ;)
     
  21. guest

    guest Guest

    Hitman Pro>> it found 1.tmp on temp folder but no active process.
    i think its not good test methodology. but its quick.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 21, 2009
  22. LagerX

    LagerX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Posts:
    540
    I really like new warning pop-ups etc :) :thumb:
     
  23. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    You check what that tmp-file belonged to by looking at the details? There you can see the defs. given by its engines. ;)
     
  24. Zimzi

    Zimzi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Posts:
    289
    Does anybody have problems with starting Firefox or Internet Explorer using Threatfire 4.6.0.4 Beta?
     
  25. 2good

    2good Guest

    Not one bit both start fine.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.