ThreatFire 4.6.0.4 Beta

http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Popup-Ad-Spyware-Blockers/Cyberhawk.shtml

http://www.pctools.com/forum/showthread.php?t=58940

 

This looks to be a very interesting update.

 

So the 'kill this process' is similar to the block/deny feature in Mamutu? I assume this feature is automatically on?

 

has problems with previous threatfire in final versions, so i feel a beta would be very problematic.

 

I have tried TF in the past and it seemed to slow things down a bit. I use OA and Antivir Premium so I really don't need another security program. The final build of Cyberhawk wasn't bad though. I have been using Mamutu on my Vista laptop and it seems to run better in my opinion.

 

i am testing this one and it is diferent from the older version
just wonder if they are using a malware black list at all or just by beahabiour?thanks

 

They're using a black- and a whitelist for the user's convenience, but the behavior of everything that happens always comes first. Once malicious behavior is exhibited, it can ask these lists for guidance - without any guidance there's a prompt for action, and not just letting things pass by.

 

thanks

 

hey jmonge you sig shows TF...Mamutu and the big daddy of them all Prevx....is that a happy co-existence ?

 

it is like a mini-hips without database i guez

 

not when they all start alerting.

 

this is a happy familly here but i have threatfire(beta) for testing purpose cause i know the bulldog is watching the gates(prevx),also mamutu is a good complament for just in case,mamutu for me is like mini-malware defender but still good

 

same here - last final, all options ON and some of my own for the registry.
working was not like charm - although i dont blame TF for all.
i'm testing mamutu2 now and it works visible smarter than TF.
i am looking forward to TF again when 4.6 goes final.

 

A deny option? Easter would be proud!

 

Finally! It's just a beta but still. I want my TF back on 64bit system.

 

i am just trying

 

~Virus Total link removed per Policy.~

 

So... did it successfully detect all the traces and keep track of them - taking care of the rogue completely?

 

it looks like successfully detect.
i scan after the restart with prevx, nothing dedected.
but i am playing new with this versiyon and malware, i dont test fully, i cant say %100 blocked
~Off topic comment removed~

 

If you want to make a very deep determination, you could always also scan with Hitman Pro, SAS and MBAM apart from Prevx.

 

Hitman Pro>> it found 1.tmp on temp folder but no active process.
i think its not good test methodology. but its quick.

 

I really like new warning pop-ups etc

 

You check what that tmp-file belonged to by looking at the details? There you can see the defs. given by its engines.

 

Does anybody have problems with starting Firefox or Internet Explorer using Threatfire 4.6.0.4 Beta?

 

Not one bit both start fine.