This must be a FP

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus v4 Beta Forum' started by m00nbl00d, Jan 4, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
  2. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    I checked it for you Nod32 4 picksup as probably a win/32 genetik trojan.I upload to Virustotal and panda detects as a suspicious file.Its probably a falsepositive and I summitted it to eset.
     
  3. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    The file DefenseWall_HIPS_v2_46.exe is reported clean here. Do you have the latest database signatre version 3737 installed? If so, please send that file in a ZIP/RAR archive protected with the password "infected" to samples[at]eset.com with "False positive" and a link to this thread in the subject.
     
  4. funkydude

    funkydude Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Posts:
    6,851
    3739 detected by the internet heuristics. I won't send since djohn did.
     
  5. ASpace

    ASpace Guest

    Attached Files:

    • dw.png
      dw.png
      File size:
      109.6 KB
      Views:
      4
  6. MasterTB

    MasterTB Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Posts:
    547
    Location:
    Paran?, Argentina

    Attached Files:

  7. CivilTaz

    CivilTaz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Posts:
    146
    Hey Marcos, wich settings do you use to test the files? It's not the first time that someone reports a file that is detected by nod32 and you say that is clean, when, as u can see here, is not true. I wonder if that's why nod32 is not detecting a lot of things and there are more cases of false positives lately; because maybe something is wrong with the settings you and your team are using to do the testing.
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.