think ive narrowed it to macrium reflect or image for windows

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by zfactor, Sep 30, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. n8chavez

    n8chavez Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2003
    Posts:
    3,355
    Location:
    Location Unknown
    I was just told that there will be a new version of the PE recovery disc available in a few days which will allow the user to create backup images.
     
  2. n8chavez

    n8chavez Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2003
    Posts:
    3,355
    Location:
    Location Unknown
    That is not a true statement. There is a tutorial on how do this here.
     
  3. loyukfai

    loyukfai Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2008
    Posts:
    105
    Any idea on Macrium's upgrade policy? I don't see an "upgrade" pricing on the purchase page. Does she release a new version every year and charge an upgrade fee for that, like Acronis?
     
  4. timcan

    timcan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2005
    Posts:
    213
    Location:
    USA
  5. MerleOne

    MerleOne Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Posts:
    1,336
    Location:
    France
    There is something quite unique with IFW/IFL that decided me to acquire a license a few years ago :

    It burns directly DVD, either from Windows in hot backup mode, or in the bootable environment. And you can mix DVD and HDD backups like this : you create a full image on a set on DVD, then perform differential backups on HDD. Each time, your set of DVD is re-read, so if the process terminates OK, you are also sure that your DVD are not corrupt. Other combinations are also possible.

    You may as well chose to save image files on a HDD, then burn them on a set of bootable DVD, with another TerabyteUnlimited tool BINGBurn.

    Overall, it's rock solid, even if sometimes a new release introduces a few bugs, they are ususally quickly corrected.
     
  6. loyukfai

    loyukfai Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2008
    Posts:
    105
  7. ambient_88

    ambient_88 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Posts:
    854
    While I can't answer your question relating to their release schedule, I can tell you that Macrium Reflect is a reliable backup software. I have had zero problems since I first used the program, and I've done quite a lot of backup and restore processes. The support is also not bad; they respond within 24 hours in most cases.
     
  8. layman

    layman Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2006
    Posts:
    293
    As someone who's switched from TrueImage to Reflect, I'd have to say that Macrium is not the sort of vendor you're worried about. They appear to work steadily at defect removal and small improvements. What's more, they ship updated versions of the rescue environments. You can wrangle such an update from Acronis only by sweet-talking the Keeper of the Code and sacrificing a goat. ;)
     
  9. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,102
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    doesnt the macrium program itself create the restore disc though??
     
  10. ambient_88

    ambient_88 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Posts:
    854
    Yes, it allows you to create a recovery disk (BartPE, Linux, or WinPE (paid only)).
     
  11. loyukfai

    loyukfai Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2008
    Posts:
    105
    Thanks, I gave the free version a try and so far, like it alot, to the point that I've already un-installed True Image.

    I especially like its simpler interface, speed, and the fact that it uses the built-in scheduler and VSS (rather than re-inventing the wheel BUT doing it poorly).

    The (relative) open approach of using XML definition and HTML logs are also nice.

    Considering to upgrade to the paid version to get incremental/differential, and encryption.

    Image for Windows looks nice as well, but it uses PHYLock instead of VSS (maybe it's better, maybe not, no idea...), and I don't have the juice to try out every one of them. It seems to be a better choice for dual-booting users through, for it has stronger Linux support (and the license covers the Linux version too).

    Cheers.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.