The Symantec/Norton Thread.

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Mayahana, Jan 21, 2015.

  1. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    9,145
    Location:
    USA
    I just double checked. I guess it's only been 9 years.
     
  2. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,387
    Visually you are half correct, but internally the product is very different from the initial version 22, along the years Norton team made those notable changes:

    1- New engine called Symantec Data Scanner.

    https://community.norton.com/en/blo...roducing-symantec-data-scanner-sds-technology

    2 - A new generic anti-exploit module called Proactive Exploit Protection:

    https://community.norton.com/en/blo...ents/introducing-proactive-exploit-protection

    3 - A new module that block scripts and macros.

    4 - A new module called "Data Protector" that acts as a last resource layer against ransomware.

    5- New heuristics and AI protection with less false positives.

    6- Better behavior blocker, performance and continuous bug fixes.

    7 - Software module updater (best in class for security solutions).

    8 - Better IPS module and agnostic browser protection along with a better Norton Safe Web extension.


    Nowadays Norton is pretty good, it is a top tier solution along Kaspersky, Bitdefender, ESET and so on.

    Ps: The engine changes and upgrades are pretty interesting too, example (yes, those are ported to Norton):

    https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en...rotect-against-living-off-the-land-tools.html
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2023
  3. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    9,145
    Location:
    USA
    They really should bump the version number and refresh the UI a bit.
     
  4. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Posts:
    5,591
    Ahh ok only 9 years. Regardless, that GUI needs updating for sure.
     
  5. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    9,145
    Location:
    USA
    It does. Hurts my eyes to look at all of that white and yellow.
     
  6. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,387
    Yeah, I agree with that, it doesnt make a good impression for the majority of users because it seems like that there weren't any improvement in years and this isnt true at all.
     
  7. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    +1.
     
  8. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  9. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  10. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    9,145
    Location:
    USA
    Looking back through this... I think I see what the version number is. Looks like 22.yy.mm.dd? Probably build date and not release date?
     
  11. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    That's as good a guess as any, but who knows with Norton. As you know, they don't like sharing too much information.
     
  12. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  13. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  14. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  15. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Posts:
    5,591
  16. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    9,145
    Location:
    USA
  17. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  18. marciano222

    marciano222 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2016
    Posts:
    33
    Location:
    Poland
    Please, if anyone can provide information on how Norton scams and deceives with the Norton Ultimate tool, check it out for yourself, turn on Smart Scan, and it will show you that supposedly your computer has such a mess and you need to buy Norton Ultimate. What is it called when someone tries to cheat their customers with false computer cleanliness results? I add photos, and you can scan Smart Scan yourself and ask someone specific to describe it here



    This is a scam because my computer is clean. Check it yourself with Smart Scan; everyone who has Norton will see the same thing.

    I never thought Norton would be so deceiving something needs to be done about it because people all over the world are being deceived
    https://ibb.co/5km1wgs
    Krusty help please
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jul 8, 2024
  19. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,529
    Location:
    .
  20. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,421
  21. Legendkiller

    Legendkiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Posts:
    1,055
    looks like we don't need to pay for Norton any longer then..:)
     
  22. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,443
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    Norton has nowhere near as much user tracking built in compared to Avast. I've used Blackfog Privacy for many years now and last time I installed Avast it was constantly blocking profiling attempts. I do not have that issue with the latest Norton 24.x, or previous versions.
     
  23. Legendkiller

    Legendkiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Posts:
    1,055
    Probably, the difference is that you are paying for one and the other is free ?

    But, still it kind of makes you wonder, if you need to pay for a AV which you can have for free.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.