the 89 line executable that demos a NOD32 bug

Have you ever heard of exclusion lists? , oh thats right you dont use the program so you couldnt know could you . Half a brain and you could have solved this 2 years ago.

 

Why don't you let this thread die and quit FEEDING THE TROLL.

 

bigc73542,

how am i trolling? im trolling because im telling you about a bug and you guys arent helping work through it? thats kinda a backward logic.

i would really like an ESET/NOD32 representative to answer these questions.

1. where is this list of toolkits that will give a positive?
1a. since your blocking madcodehook it is obvious that nod32 has a list of toolkits that will give a positive. where are these listed?
2. where is this list of toolkits that give a negative?
3. what makes them different?
4. whats to stop those from being "misused by malware" and start being flagged?
5. what does madcodehook do that those dont?

 

bump as no reply yet on this bug.

 

bump as no reply yet on this bug.

 

another day goes by that nod32 doesnt assist on this bug.

 

bumping thread as a moderator has yet to reply

 

bumping thread as no reply yet.

 

bumping thread again as no reply yet.

 

any word on when this bug will be fixed?

 

still no word on when this bug wil be fixed.

 

just to save a moderator from having to scroll back up

i would really like an ESET/NOD32 representative to answer these questions.

1. where is this list of toolkits that will give a positive?
1a. since your blocking madcodehook it is obvious that nod32 has a list of toolkits that will give a positive. where are these listed?
2. where is this list of toolkits that give a negative?
3. what makes them different?
4. whats to stop those from being "misused by malware" and start being flagged?
5. what does madcodehook do that those dont?

 

bump as no reply yet

 

bumping thread because still no reply

 

bumping thread as moderator has yet to reply

 

still no answer.

 

still no answer

 

just to save a moderator from having to scroll back up

i would really like an ESET/NOD32 representative to answer these questions.

1. where is this list of toolkits that will give a positive?
1a. since your blocking madcodehook it is obvious that nod32 has a list of toolkits that will give a positive. where are these listed?
2. where is this list of toolkits that give a negative?
3. what makes them different?
4. whats to stop those from being "misused by malware" and start being flagged?
5. what does madcodehook do that those dont?

 

still no response

 

still no response

 

no reply yet.

 

still no reply

 

just to save a moderator from having to scroll back up

i would really like an ESET/NOD32 representative to answer these questions.

1. where is this list of toolkits that will give a positive?
1a. since your blocking madcodehook it is obvious that nod32 has a list of toolkits that will give a positive. where are these listed?
2. where is this list of toolkits that give a negative?
3. what makes them different?
4. whats to stop those from being "misused by malware" and start being flagged?
5. what does madcodehook do that those dont?

 

still have yet to hear a response.

 

still no response from a moderator or eset