Testing PG

Discussion in 'ProcessGuard' started by redwolfe_98, Dec 17, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. redwolfe_98

    redwolfe_98 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Posts:
    582
    Location:
    South Carolina, USA
    in one thread, it said the PG woud stop the beast trojan. i figured that that meant that PG would stop process injection, and decided to test it with "firehole". according to the firehole program, it was able to successfully run, so i am questioning if PG can actually prevent process injection. http://www.keir.net/firehole.html
     
    redwolfe_98, Dec 17, 2003
    #1
  2. redwolfe_98

    redwolfe_98 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Posts:
    582
    Location:
    South Carolina, USA
    i understand now (i am thinking) that "firehole" uses that one exploit that PG is known not to cover... fortunately, that exploit is said to not be used by any known trojans.
     
    redwolfe_98, Dec 18, 2003
    #2
  3. Jason_DiamondCS

    Jason_DiamondCS Former DCS Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2002
    Posts:
    1,046
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Yeah on the page it says it uses SetWindowsHookEx(), PG currently does not cover this.

    -Jason-
     
    Jason_DiamondCS, Dec 18, 2003
    #3
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...