SS Anti-Test tool Updated, Tested with 4 Software

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by guest, May 15, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. guest

    guest Guest

    SpyShelter Anti-Test tool Updated to v1.3
    I tested it with 4 software on Win7 real machine

    Note: They will update this tool their website a few hours later
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Konata Izumi

    Konata Izumi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Posts:
    1,544
  3. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    How would you say SS is doing overall protecting a system? I got the impression that the software is so much more than just an anti-keylogger by now...
     
  4. timestand

    timestand Former Poster

    Joined:
    May 7, 2010
    Posts:
    172
    This reason why no trust program to protect you. Need use block malware run in first place. Test after test they show. Always new way to log and hack system. Next Zemana come up with way to pass test that Spyshelter fail. As I say best to block from run in first place.
     
  5. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    551
    Location:
    Moon
    guest can you give me link for this version?


    EDIT: ok got it,itson their website
     
    Last edited: May 16, 2010
  6. shadek

    shadek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    2,363
    Location:
    Sweden
    They should've tested Prevx with Safe Online.
     
  7. nikanthpromod

    nikanthpromod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Posts:
    1,369
    Location:
    India
  8. nikanthpromod

    nikanthpromod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Posts:
    1,369
    Location:
    India
    I tested leak test tool against comodo and it failed test 4a ,5a ,4b, 5b, sound recording.
     
  9. AvinashR

    AvinashR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    2,060
    Location:
    New Delhi Metallo β-Lactamase 1
    GDATA IS 2011 (Report)

    1. KeyLogging:- Failed
    2. Webcam Capture:- Failed
    3. Clipboard Monitoring:- Failed
    4. System Protection:- Failed
    5. Sound Record:- Failed
    6. Screen Shot (Test 5a & 5b):- Failed


    GData IS 2011 Passed other Screen Shot Tests !!
     
  10. NoIos

    NoIos Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Posts:
    607
    Bad news for Zemana, considering it's an antilogger.
     
  11. AvinashR

    AvinashR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    2,060
    Location:
    New Delhi Metallo β-Lactamase 1
    Zemana is now lagging behind...SpyShelter is future !!
     
  12. lordraiden

    lordraiden Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Posts:
    3,068
    Can anybody test it vs COMODO, please?
    With the sandbox and without if is possible xD
     
  13. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    lol the one thing i love about all these vendor created "test" programs is that, their product always seems to come out perfect while the competition never is able to get completely perfect for the most part at least.

    i think people are putting too much trust that these individual vendors arents just including methods that are known to be blocked by their product specifically and they know isnt by other vendors, yet im sure if Zemana or OA created a test like SS's test, they could create the exact same results u see here, just opposite.

    thats why personally, i dont really take much value in a test created by a vendor who is trying to sell the specific type of product their testing, it just makes sense that theyd try to protect their livelihood by making sure ther product passes the test with flying colours and the competition doesnt.
     
  14. doktornotor

    doktornotor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Posts:
    2,047
    Bingo. And especially when the antilogger SW vendor is engaged in business of selling HW and SW keyloggers. Meh... :rolleyes:
     
  15. guest

    guest Guest

    Maybe, i want it to see.
    it is new development opportunity, SS developer wont be angry.
    Zemana created ZEALR test, SS developers created protection within a few days.

    Leak tests are not bad. It give us some ideas about protection ability. If malware using screenshot test 1 b methodology, zemana and oa will be bypassed. It is simple.

    If you are use defensewall, sound logger can log your voice (if you use microphone).

    This tests are not non-used method by malware, i hope zemana, oa and other vendors can be fast.

    maybe there is some marketing idea behind the test but it is not important. We cant ignore results
     
  16. nikanthpromod

    nikanthpromod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Posts:
    1,369
    Location:
    India
  17. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    and how exactly do u know the details of the tests methods? what evidence do u have of that? the test Zemana has out arent really a leaktest, ther more like an eicar for hips software. the test is so narrow that i can hardly consider some random "method" named 1b as legitimate concern when clearly that method was chosen to be included in the test BECAUSE SS KNOWS it is blocked by them since well, they created the test and of course their own software will block it and clearly its been created (and is updated) so that it makes sure the competition never acheives a perfect score.

    if u find me a 3rd party, non commercial test i can see more legitimacy in it, but not a test with a handful of "methods" that a vendor whos trying to sell that particular type of software created, it holds no value because they are biased to their product

    but even after all that, dont get me wrong, i have no opinion on the quality and effectiveness of SS, i just dont see any value in this test.
     
  18. CloneRanger

    CloneRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,833
    It is possible for vendors to code in "special" results for their own products that others might not pass. I havn't seen/heard ANY evidence that SS is doing this.

    However, the fact is if tests such as theirs, and the latest one in particular, manage to bypass other vendors software and defeat their purpose, in full or part, then the test IS valid against them.

    I tested against Zemana and found it failed all Screen Capture except No.3 :(

    Hopefully other vendors will take note ASAP and improve, as i presume the baddies will also be taking note. Of course NO malware will be able to take Screen Shots or Keylog etc, if it's not allowed to run in the first place :D
     
  19. guest

    guest Guest

    Every vendors want to sell their software. It is normal, This is product. Will we talk marketing? They need money, they must sell for better product, competition , otherwise they will die.

    Mostly vendors develop their own tests and release

    Zemana, SpyShelter, System safety, Diamon cs, Geswall, Comodo, ....
    All of them serious vendors. Serious tests.

    When zemana released their first test, many hips and anti-logger software cant catch it. today mostly catch.

    And SS first anti-logger test. Today mostly catch.

    Is anti-logger, leaktests or marketing tests (if you want to look this side) useles?
    I think no. Lets look Prevx report.
    They take heed. And others too.

    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=267205&highlight=prevx leaktest

    Sure, every vendors want to show "we are better than others"
    This is never ending story.


    I think this is not bad, this is growth opportunity.

    We will see, will Zemana, OA or others block test 1b and others with their new version or wont.

    Another side, SS very powerfull toys. I tested it many commerical keyloggers, it block all of them. They dont need dirty marketing way.
     

    Attached Files:

    • comm.png
      comm.png
      File size:
      203.1 KB
      Views:
      127
    Last edited by a moderator: May 17, 2010
  20. guest

    guest Guest

    Yes. It is clear. Anybody can retest.
    If zemana release their new own test, we will test this forum.
    We did already this version;
    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=218451

    All test are open to us, everybody can download, analyse tests.
    If there is a any deception, it cant be secret.

    I think everybody should be happy and thankfull make their product better
    Thank you Spy Shelter
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 17, 2010
  21. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    551
    Location:
    Moon
    Nice test guest

    Thanx
     
  22. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    if the test was released by an organization with no alignment to any one product, id have no problem with it, but im sorry i cant put my trust in a test thats trying to sell a product, and NONE of us have anyway of knowing how these "methods" are chosen, and why out of all possible methods, THESE particular few wer chosen to point out cuz im sure ther are plenty other. and i do understand that ther job is to make money so nothing wrong with marketing, but dont take marketing as legitimate and completely unbiased testing because they have no incentive to do something like that.

    again, not saying SS is crap software, just the test created by the vendors is biased by design so should not be taken as the complete truth.
     
  23. timestand

    timestand Former Poster

    Joined:
    May 7, 2010
    Posts:
    172
    Yes as I say plenty other way to bypass these program. seem every week new bypass. Not good way to protect system.
     
  24. 0strodamus

    0strodamus Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Posts:
    1,047
    Location:
    United Surveillance States
    guest, your tests of SS are very informative and much appreciated! :thumb:
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.