Scan interval

Discussion in 'FileChecker & ID-Blaster Forum' started by Yinda, Nov 17, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Yinda

    Yinda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2002
    Posts:
    78
    Hi, I have just installed FileChecker because I like the idea.

    When running the tutorial, however, I see that the recommended scan interval is 1 to 5 seconds. Isn't it too much for the system resources?
     
  2. Pieter_Arntz

    Pieter_Arntz Spyware Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Posts:
    13,440
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Hi Yinda,

    Welcome at Wilders.
    I´ve got File Checker running at an interval of 5 seconds, checking 8 files every time. For a very short burst it uses 1% of my CPU time and almost no memory. Could you give us some of the specifics of your computer?
    I´ll give you mine in exchange ;)
    Pentium 4 1.4 GHz
    384 MB RIMM
    Windows XP Pro

    Regards,

    Pieter
     
  3. Yinda

    Yinda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2002
    Posts:
    78
    Thanks Pieter,

    It is not necessary to give your configuration in exchange ;)

    Mine is Pentium 3 450 MHz, 320 MB, W98SE, not the same ? :oops:

    My question was theoretical: I have not yet started scanning. But every 5 seconds !

    Regards,

    Dhat
     
  4. Pieter_Arntz

    Pieter_Arntz Spyware Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Posts:
    13,440
    Location:
    Netherlands
    At the speed computers operate a lot can happen in 5 seconds. On your system File Checker should be able to operate without any noticeable delay.
    Even if you were to choose a 1 second interval.

    Regards,

    Pieter
     
  5. javacool

    javacool BrightFort Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2002
    Posts:
    4,018
    FileChecker can run using only 1% to 4% of CPU with scanning set to 1 second intervals. :) (The 4% mark was recorded on a 233 mhz system, so I don't think you'll have any problems.)

    However, it should be noted that this depends on the number of items in your watch-list. Obviously, the more items, the more processing time FileChecker will need to use (but 100 or so, or even more, should not put you above that 4% mark on a 233 mhz system - I have 500 items in the watch-list on a 1.7 Ghz system and FileChecker only uses 2% of the cpu at all times).

    Regards,

    -Javacool
     
  6. Pieter_Arntz

    Pieter_Arntz Spyware Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Posts:
    13,440
    Location:
    Netherlands
    500? Now I´m curious ;) What did I forget?

    Regards,

    Pieter
     
  7. javacool

    javacool BrightFort Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2002
    Posts:
    4,018
    It was more of a test, really - I put almost any program or file that could even remotely have anything to do with system safety or security in the watch-list (that includes a very large number of dlls in the Windows System folder). ;)

    Regards,

    -Javacool
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.