Rollback RX or ?

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by TheMozart, May 13, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    617
    Location:
    USA
    LOL... :D

    The only substitutes that I'm aware of are the RB 'clones' (AyRecovery, EAZ-FIX, MagiCure, etc.), Farstone RestoreIT (which imho isn't nearly as good as RB) and the free (but problematic) CTM.

    Scott
     
  2. 2YsUR

    2YsUR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Posts:
    61
    Which build of V9.1 are you on? The latest 2 builds seem to have corrected that problem.

    V9.1 Build 2697287695 - updated May 18, 2012
    V9.1 Build 2696720400 - updated July 18, 2011
     
  3. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    617
    Location:
    USA
    Still on the previous build. I'll upgrade to the latest and keep my fingers crossed. :doubt:
     
  4. twl845

    twl845 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Posts:
    4,186
    Location:
    USA
    Me too. However, we will have to uninstall the old build and then install the newest build before we know if it's fixed the next time we uninstall and re-install. ;)
     
  5. 2YsUR

    2YsUR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Posts:
    61
    Oh, well at least you'll get a few bug fixes. They seem to have fixed the problem with the tray icon not functioning:D
     
  6. twl845

    twl845 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Posts:
    4,186
    Location:
    USA
    Guess what. Today I uninstalled RB, made 2 images, and did a defrag, and then after disabling my AV and putting my firewall on learning mode for good measure, I then installed the new build of RB leaving the web site on. To my surprise and joy the installation took without any problem with the Product ID. Could the problem actually be fixed? :D
     
  7. 2YsUR

    2YsUR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Posts:
    61
    woooow! Great to hear. I guess once in awhile they get it right!:cool:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.