Roll out of new web filtering

Discussion in 'Prevx Releases' started by aieie, Oct 15, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    We have a large support staff so there is bound to be a range of awareness of how the product works. However, it definitely does not require a scan after whitelisting/blacklisting a website.
     
  2. The Seeker

    The Seeker Registered Member

    Finally received the new Web Filtering module, but have disabled the Firefox add-on as I find it mostly useless. Now to see whether the false positives are reduced.
     
  3. sturgess

    sturgess Registered Member

    Well that's reassuring :blink:
     
  4. sturgess

    sturgess Registered Member

    Keep disabling bits here, and bits there and we'll all have what we wanted in the first place, Prevx 4.
     
  5. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    ...an infection :p
     
  6. sturgess

    sturgess Registered Member

    Nope, NIS + Prevx 4 :)
     
  7. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Disabling the web filtering browser addon will prevent WSA from analyzing websites, removing your web filtering protection. You can disable Lastpass if wanted, but you should keep the web filtering addon enabled.
     
  8. The Seeker

    The Seeker Registered Member

    Ah OK. I thought the add-on merely placed the check marks next to Google/Bing/Yahoo search results. Perhaps the add-on's description could be a little more detailed. (I've re-enabled it now.)
     
  9. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Thanks, I'll see what we can do about making it more descriptive. You can disable the search result annotation within the Settings page of WSA if you don't want to see those, for what it's worth.
     
  10. shorTcircuiT

    shorTcircuiT Registered Member


    I most certainly do not want to disable it, but after reading your reply I went looking to find the setting for that. It is in a strange place: it listed under Firewall instead of under Shields, which is the opposite of what I expected for some reason.
     
  11. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    hmm i dont use the firefox add in normally but webroot still detects everything inlcuding websites many times as i have told you before with the issue with the previous web filter, or is this just with the new version of the web filter that it needs to be enabled? i personally dont like the checkmarks thing.
     
  12. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    We have it under firewall because many users consider anything protecting internet applications/traffic to be a firewall.
     
  13. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    It is only relevant for the new web filtering, and you can disable the checkmarks if wanted - it is a highly requested feature but not one for everyone if they don't need it.
     
  14. The Seeker

    The Seeker Registered Member

    It's a good thing I read this as I never would've thought to look under the Firewall settings; I would've looked for the Web Shield settings then wondered where they were!
     
  15. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

  16. De Hollander

    De Hollander Registered Member

    @Prevhelp
    "We have it under firewall because many users consider anything protecting internet applications/traffic to be a firewall."

    Whit all do respect, that's is a wrong approach regarding the location off the settings.

    The Seeker pointed it out precisely, it's a web base application.

    Sincerely

    De Hollander
     
  17. tomdy2k

    tomdy2k Registered Member

    I'm using Chrome 31.0.1650.57 m..On win 7 64 bit..How do I know if i have the new web filtering..?:oops:
     
  18. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    I appreciate the feedback, however, we took a lot of feedback into account when placing it where it is now and moving it would cause further confusion so I don't expect us to move it in the near future.
     
  19. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Guess I'll give up on this and continue unlocking.
     
  20. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    I've escalated it internally and the team is looking into it. For the time being, I suggest just continuing to unblock locally and report it in through support, and I'll report back as soon as I hear something.
     
  21. explanoit

    explanoit Registered Member

    Joe,
    How long does the web/IP filtering component cache results from BrightCloud?
     
  22. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Hello explanoit nice to see you here from the Webroot Community! :D

    Cheers,

    Daniel
     
  23. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    It depends on the website and can range from a few minutes to a couple hours, but the cache is not persisted across browser sessions.
     
  24. Thankful

    Thankful Savings Monitor

    Support is not responding to a URL Reputation Change Request. I submitted a false positive over a week ago and have heard nothing and the false positive still exists.
     
  25. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    finally got the update on 1 of my lic's. the rest are still waiting.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice