Roll back/Go back-software - Which is the best?

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by carlo555, May 10, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    As far as I know, RollbackRx can,t be used in multi-boot environment. Am I true?
     
  2. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046
    You are wrong - the manual , installation all support it.
     
  3. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046
    Indeed a very promising future. But FD defense will be revised some time soon ish so ..... who knows
     
  4. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    This is true. I know what Rollback has up it's sleave, but the Leapfrog guys also have some stuff planned. Given the break thru they made with their Archiving it's going to be interesting.

    I know also Andrew at Rollback is working on the issue's I reported to him, but I got to tell you FDISR, takes the abuse of strenous testing much better on my box.

    Pete
     
  5. carlo555

    carlo555 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2006
    Posts:
    9
    Thank you som much for all the great suggestions.

    I have uppdated my list.

    Backontrack
    Deepfreeze
    Drive vaccine
    Goback
    Raxco first defense
    Restoreit
    Rollback rx
    Shadowuser
    Super win winrescue xp
    Vcom recovery commander (Fix it utilities)
    Winrollback

    Remarkably I my computer started to return "blue screen" again this morning which makes my implementation of any of the above solutions more urgent. I finally got out of the situation by deactivating the function for network attacks in Kaspersky.

    I have decided to try out all the above programs on a computer I don't use. First I will install the programs and next delete vital parts of Windows, restart the computer and see what happens and which of the programs that most easily and reliably gets me back to a point before the deletion.

    Thank you again!
     
  6. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    starfish, I believe aigle's statement to the effect that Rollback can not be used in a multi-boot environment is correct.

    I can't find where in the Rollback manual or faq's it says otherwise, but in every instance (that I'm aware of) it is necessary for a multi-boot program to modify the MBR in order to setup a multi-boot environment. Rollback, FDISR, GoBack, and most other system-restore programs require total control of the MBR, so they can not co-exist within that environment.

    The only exception to this that I'm aware of (and it's not really a multi-boot environment) is a virtual-drive environment (such as VMware) because the system-restore program sees the virtual-drive as just another file.

    ~pv
     
  7. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046

    Try the manual again

    Rb Rx professional - chapter 2 page page 17

    Installation Custom setup - It is a small side note but there. I confirmed it before installing on my multi boot system.


    Some more than others but generally a good rule
     
  8. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    Hmm, you are right- it's there (though it's rather inconspicuous). ...live and learn I always say... :oops:

    Btw, which multi-boot program are you using? ~pv
     
  9. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    I remeber when I wanted to do dual boot XP with linux, I sent them a mail and they told me Rollback is not recommended in this multiboot environment.
     
  10. Acadia

    Acadia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Posts:
    4,332
    Location:
    US
    I used an older version of GoBack for five years, before it was owned by Norton. Since I have not used a recent version own by Norton, this post may be way off mark BUT I am going to ASSume that GoBack is still as good as it was back then and say this:

    While using GoBack for five years, it was flawless and never let me down. I discovered, from reading Usenet and many forums, that all the folks having trouble with GoBack did not know how to use it properly.

    Now, that being said, let me say this -- FirstDefense blows Goback out of the water!! :cool:

    Acadia
     
  11. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Like Acadia said, Goback never let me down either, but by a close call of a friend of mine I learned Goback had and still has a serious flaw. She called and asked if upgrading ZA was a good idea. They were having issues at the time. I said sure you've got Goback incase something went wrong. She upgraded Zone Alarm and went out to a meeting. In the interim her husband who has a hobby of Astronomy photograph processed a whole series of photo's. Goback massive disk thing shut goback done. Fortunately ZA was okay for them, because if they had needed to Goback, they were out of luck.

    This is still an issue with Goback, but not with Rollback or FDISR. Unlike FDISR you can't (or at least you couldn't) defrag with GOback. Same problem it would shut itself down, and all history is lost.

    Pete
     
  12. Acadia

    Acadia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Posts:
    4,332
    Location:
    US
    Yup, every time that I defragged, I had to shut down GB; even if GB could keep up with all of the file activity, hearing my poor hard drive thrashing around like that was simply too much.

    Also, my first attempt at installing WindowsXP SP2 back in 2004 was a failure (my fault) and resulted in the dreaded no-boot scenario. With FirstDefense I simply rebooted into another Snapshot and had my entire system recovered in 5-10 minutes; my second attempt at installing SP2 was a success. Had I been using GoBack during that first attempt, I know that GoBack would not have been able to handle all of the file changing for that huge Service Pack; it would have shut itself down and I would have been stuck with an unbootable system.

    Acadia
     
  13. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046
    The manual is poor in this area my sense is that it only support a windows multi boot environment. I boot XP and MCE 2005 without any major problems

    I think I would ask before trying GRUB or Acronis OS selector - I doubt they would work with it
     
  14. PeterVO

    PeterVO Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Posts:
    87
    Location:
    Belgium, Leuven
    Hello,

    I'm also still using the last version of Roxio's GoBack on my dual boot laptop (Win98 Second Edition & Win XP SP2) and have used it happily for many years. It saved me and my Thinkpad many times for sure.
    I've always used it together with many versions of Diskeeper (at this moment Diskeeper 10 Professional Premier) and Diskeeper's 'Set and Forget'-option makes it possible for GoBack to return in time for on average 5 to 7 days.

    Kind regards,

    PeterVO
     
  15. rondijack

    rondijack Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Posts:
    23
    I am comparing RollbackRx and FDISR. Are there any problems using FDISR with a disk defrag program? Can FDISR be used with True Image? I dont see any answers in their literature. Also I am not really clear on what the problem some people are having with Rollback. Is it because the snapshots cannot be used for returning the system to an earlier state? I have had this problem several times with Windows restore, which is why I am looking for an alternate program
     
  16. Acadia

    Acadia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Posts:
    4,332
    Location:
    US
    Yes, FD can be used with TrueImage, but the Pre-boot option should be disabled while creating and restoring an image.

    There can be some issues with defrag programs but I believe that they are rare. The Raxco website does indeed have information in the FirstDefense FAQs and Knowledgebase about FD and defraggers. Good luck.

    Acadia
     
  17. rondijack

    rondijack Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Posts:
    23
    Acadia thank you for the info. Can any one clarify the problems they encountered with RollbackRx? Was it the fact that the images were unstable?
    Thanks for any info you can give me.
    Rondijack
     
  18. sukarof

    sukarof Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Posts:
    1,887
    Location:
    Stockholm Sweden
    This is the problem I had with Rollback Rx, see post 329:
    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=127866&page=14
    In short: One line of my snapshots got corrupted somehow in Rollback Rx all of a sudden. It could be something in my system or it could be some bug in Rollback that appears under special circumstances. I dont know wich, but for now I am sticking to Firstdefence until a new version of Rollback Rx arrives or when I do a reformat and a clean install of Windows XP, coz I really like Rollback Rx, it´s lightning fast taking the snapshots.
     
  19. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    Which I experienced as well (see post 333 of same thread)! I uninstalled RBx and will not use it until they (HDS) find and fix the problem.
     
  20. rondijack

    rondijack Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Posts:
    23
    Thank you sukarof for your prompt and very useful reply.
    Rondijack
     
  21. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Hi rondijack

    I concur with the others. I think for simple stuff Rollback was okay, but for serious testing where your system encounters numerous crashes and hangs, I saw issues. I also have gone back to FDISR, as I consider it totally reliable.

    Also there where imaging issues with Rollback. What I just finished doing today was imaging my system. I took off my FDISR snapshot, imaged with Ghost,ATI,and IFD. Then replaced my FDISR snapshot. Probably won't image again for several months. I just update my FDISR archives daily. So quick.

    Pete
     
  22. carlo555

    carlo555 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2006
    Posts:
    9
    Now I have tested the following:

    Backontrack
    Deepfreeze
    Drive vaccine
    Goback
    Raxco first defense
    Restoreit
    Rollback rx
    Shadowuser
    Super win winrescue xp
    Vcom recovery commander (Fix it utilities)
    Win rollback

    (Demo/trial-versions of the programs can be found on the manufacturers' websites.)

    I was looking for software that would fulfil three tasks:

    1) Delete unwanted changes in Windows XP and remove unwanted installations of malware upon restart.

    2) Could exempt specified maps and functions from routines, so that chosen new files would remain and also things such as new virus definitions, in other words, not delete wanted changes.

    3) Could be used to reboot at system crashes.

    The first task was tested by installing the free version of Kazaa, which comes bundled with a number of intrusive adware/spyware applications and as well make several additions to the start up registry. Then I inspected the computer file system to see whether Kazaa (and the adware/spyware components) was completely gone at restart. I also made a scan with Ad-aware to be sure.

    The second task was tested by inspecting the functions in the software, to see whether it could be configured to exempt chosen maps from the overall restore function.

    The last task was not tested this time. Did not dare and have time to simulate system crashes at the moment. Maybe I will do this later when I find a computer that could be crashed risk-free. Feel free anyone to do complete this part of the testing and report the results under this thread.

    Take the test for what it is. It is not scientific. I stopped evaluating some of the programs because of specified reasons.

    Results:

    BackOnTrack Home
    Doesn't remove Kazaa upon restart. Can be configured. Difficult to uninstall.

    Deep Freeze
    Removes Kazaa automatically upon restart. Saves absolutely no files. Cannot be configured.

    Drive Vaccine
    Removes Kazaa automatically upon restart. Saves absolutely no files. Cannot be configured. Difficult to uninstall.

    GoBack
    Could removes Kazaa upon restart is so is chosen. Long time to install. Feels slow.

    FirstDefense
    Doesn't remove Kazaa upon restart. Slow to make copies/snapshots.

    RestoreIT
    Removes Kazaa automatically upon restart. Unclear whether it could be configured to make desired exemptions.

    RollBack Rx
    Removes Kazaa automatically upon restart. Chosen maps can be exempted from routines. Unclear whether it can be accessed at boot.

    Shadow User
    Removes Kazaa automatically upon restart. Chosen maps can be exempted from routines.

    Win Rescue
    Creates boot diskettes and restore points, which could be used at system crashes. That's the functions I could see that the program offers. Did not try to install and uninstall Kazaa.

    VCOM Recovery Commander
    Demands that a reboot CD be created in order to evaluate the program. Did not care to do it. Uninstalled it.

    WinRollBack
    Difficult to really try the program, because it displays a demo screen intensively for 20 seconds per time. Did not care to wait. Uninstalled it.

    Your comments and own experiences are of course more than welcome.

    //Carlo
     
  23. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    Are you sure about FDISR. Did you do it right?
    This is not supposed to happen in FDISR. Unfortunately, I never used it in practice.
     
  24. TonyW

    TonyW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,741
    Location:
    UK
    I'm abit puzzled by this. If you're going to test software like installing Kazaa, and then seeing if you can remove it completely from your system, it will work if done the right way.

    My guess is you'd make a snapshot of the system before Kazaa is installed, call it Kazaa. You then boot into that snapshot. Install Kazaa, play around with it then boot back into previous snapshot - hurrah, Kazaa is gone! You can then either update the Kazaa snapshot with the one you're in or remove it completely. Either way, Kazaa is gone.

    As for speed of copying/making snapshots, creating a brand new snapshot will take longer than updating an existing snapshot. Updating a snapshot takes anywhere from 2-6 minutes on my system.

    Peter/Acadia, please correct me if I'm wrong in this.
     
  25. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    @tony You are right on the money.

    @carlo555. Don't take this as criticism, but if you are going to do these kinds of tests you need to really understand the software. Your comment on First Defense indicates you don't understand the software.

    If you install something and reboot, why would it be gone. When you work in a FDISR snapshot you are just working on your computer. Install something and reboot, and it's still there. But as Tony said I maintain 2 snapshots. If I boot into the 2nd one, and install anything, good or bad, and then boot back to the 1st snapshot, and refresh the 2nd snapshot, and what ever was installed there is gone. More so then an uninstall could ever do.

    For example I have gone into my 2nd snapshot, and uninstalled my AV, and Firewall, and then installed a security suite, reputed to be hard to remove. When finished I go back to my 1st snapshot, and refresh. At that point the 2nd snapshot is Identical to the 1st.

    As far as crash recovery. Most crashes and the system will reboot fine. It's more like what happens when you trash the system. I have trashed my registry, and also at time trashed the system so back I couldn't even boot into safe mode. With First Defense just boot to the 2nd snapshot, refresh the first and I am good to go.

    As to reliably accomplishing what you outlined I would rate:

    FDISR 100%
    Rollback 75%

    Haven't done anything with the rest.

    Pete
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.