Rogue slips right through Comodo!

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by hamzah95, Jul 28, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. IceCube1010

    IceCube1010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Posts:
    963
    Location:
    Earth
    I guess the 3 million dollar question is, When you re-booted your pc, did this rogue still appear or did it cease to exist? The deny messages might have been startup and service type entries that the rogue was trying to setup.

    Ice
     
  2. overangry

    overangry Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    Posts:
    309
    The rouge did not get through... It only appears as though it has.

    The Rouge
    1. Can read but cannot modify trusted resources.
    2. Cannot read or modify confidential resources.
    3. May create new untrusted resources, e.g. files.
    4. May read or modify untrusted resources.

    You may want to have a look at this start watching at 11:38 minutes into the video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBKNHBl-yos

    Pressing the terminate button will stop it in it's tracks
     

    Attached Files:

  3. IceCube1010

    IceCube1010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Posts:
    963
    Location:
    Earth
    thanks for the update!
     
  4. Wildest

    Wildest Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Posts:
    304
    <Emphasis added>
    Thanks for this.

    Another member of this forum remarked that CIS does not differentiate between the reads and the writes of critical system resource information in their Defense+ system.

    Could this be something that Comodo has actively ignored to the detriment of true security?
     
  5. Heimdall

    Heimdall Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Posts:
    185
    Actually, I believe that is incorrect. From the D+ help file:

    The same is true of any 'critical' resource. That really is the whole point of D+
     
  6. 3xist

    3xist Guest

    Hi Guys

    Defense+ worked as expected, even with this rouge. CIS is a very well designed suite, where the AV, Firewall & Defense+ By default all achieve top notch protection than any "traditional AV" out there. Based on Egemens findings and analyzing this thing with Comodo Instant Malware Analysis, The Rouge doesn't do much at all. It's a SIMPLE application and shows a few warnings. That's it. It does no harm to the system what so ever, Even if it did, You will be Alerted for - It may create a few registry keys, but CIS blocks these and allows the rouge to run BECAUSE it can NOT do any harm further, D+ doesn't stop programs from doing "non-malicious things". It stops the execution of malware behavior, Not simple programs just running on your PC/sitting on your HD and doing no harm at all.

    People think about "Proactive" and it offers more security than the default internet security configuration. This is NOT the case, internet security configuration gives acceptable security with acceptable user experience (Both need to be followed for a Security Vendor)... Meaning low on pop ups too. All 3 components (Antivirus, Firewall, Defense+) Work together to PROTECT you and what is IMPORTANT. :) You can always switch to proactive to get more pop ups, And for the average user, that will be annoying and they will simply boot CIS off the system. :)

    This is not a bypass for CIS at all.
    Other companies protect differently, So what? But this is how it is for CIS.

    Hope this clarifies. Pls let me know if I didn't.

    Cheers,
    Josh
     
  7. 3xist

    3xist Guest

    Yes.

    Running different security software from different vendors together off course can cause potential incompatible issues like the scenario of your cause with Sandboxie.

    Cheers,
    Josh
     
  8. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    LOL, whenever I run malware which is missed by my AV, the files are in the my pending list in comodo. But when i try to run the files which are in pending list they can run
     
  9. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    No i don't get a execution alert. I'm using proactive mode with defense+ at clean pc mode. i.e. I download a piece of malware onto my desktop, I double click it to run it (the malware is in the my pending list) and the rogue runs with only a alert to access memory and even if blocked it runs. Is there an option to block anything from running if in the my pending list?
     
  10. nick s

    nick s Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Posts:
    1,430
    It's more likely that you have given Sandboxie's start.exe blanket permission to spawn new processes (child applications). You should have your HIPS set to control what start.exe is doing. Malware Defender, with default settings, alerted me when start.exe executed xpdeluxe.exe.
     
  11. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    I don't get an execution alert. And is there ANY WAY I can block anything from running if it is in the my pending list?
    EDIT: actually I don't think I ever got a execution alert.
     
  12. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    I know they should but again is there any way I can block anything from running if it is in the my pending list?
     
  13. 3xist

    3xist Guest

    Can some one pls send me this rouge again?

    Cheers,
    Josh
     
  14. 3xist

    3xist Guest

    Got the rouge.

    Comodo Secure DNS won't let me access it this time. :(

    I'll go to another PC and and put it on there and transfer it on to my PC.

    Cheers,
    Josh
     

    Attached Files:

  15. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    I want to use the zero alerts setup, but the zero alerts thing doesn't block everything in the my pending list files
     
  16. 3xist

    3xist Guest

  17. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    No and yes. I have already set that up, but it doesn't work like I want it to. Since I don't ever get execution alerts, I was wondering if I can block anything from running, if it is in the my pending files list without any alerts.

    EDIT: BTW the spelling is wrong
    Configurng CIS
    You forgot an I after r.
    Configuring CIS
     
  18. Saraceno

    Saraceno Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Posts:
    2,405
    Can't you just run www.revouninstaller.com in advanced mode to remove all files and registry traces?

    Regarding Hitman Pro, did it identify just the installation file, or detect the file once it was installed and running?
     
  19. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    the infection was long gone LOL. What are you talking abouto_O?
     
  20. Saraceno

    Saraceno Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Posts:
    2,405
    I'm late on the scene ;) , was just commenting, rather than an AV scan, if a user has this rogue program running, revouninstaller should remove it thoroughly.
     
  21. TonyW

    TonyW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,741
    Location:
    UK
    I'm a bit confused. You seem to be saying the test didn't work with Sandboxie, and yet Franklin says in post #101 that "Sandboxie contains and deletes it no probs". Is that because he was using Sandboxie in a VM?
     
  22. Saraceno

    Saraceno Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Posts:
    2,405
    Tony, only read the thread briefly (at work), but I'm assuming Comodo might not have shown the appropriate alerts as the rogue was also run while sandboxed - meaning, sandboxie limited the way Comodo reacted/performed.

    So what I gathered, Comodo on its own, at default settings takes care of this program. Sandboxie on its own contains this program.
     
  23. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    Well, I'm giving up Comodo for nowo_O . Will wait for the v4.
    Trying Online Armor, So far so good:thumb:
     
  24. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    I really like the huge list of known good and bad softwares:thumb: :thumb: in Online Armor
     
  25. hamzah95

    hamzah95 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Posts:
    108
    And the Zero alerts thing in online armor really works for me. Just disabled the gui from starting, and in the services set oasrv.exe to automatic.:thumb: :thumb: It just blocks every unknown exe from starting. Since comodo doesn't have that trusted and untrusted files list, it kept on blocking even legitimate exes.:thumbd:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.