Roboscan 2.5

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by trjam, Mar 4, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DX2

    DX2 Guest

    This is my new AV for clients computers over MSE. Very light, good detection, even pups. :thumb:
     
  2. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    7,807
    It's an excellent choice, as it exceptionally light.
     
  3. IvoShoen

    IvoShoen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Posts:
    789
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 21, 2014
  4. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    6,590
    BS test.......

    At 04:41 = Scan Options:
    Heuristic => With default setting, the option "Enable Heuristic detection" is disabled.

    The so called "tester" left the above option disabled...........

    --------------------
    Re Robo Heuristic/Proactive Detection Technology =
    http://i1-win.softpedia-static.com/screenshots/Roboscan-Internet-Security-Free_11.png?1377760561
    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=2348395&postcount=31
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2014
  5. khanyash

    khanyash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Posts:
    2,158
    Most AV products have cosmetic heuristics & are not effective.
    Roboscan Heuristics is also cosmetic heuristics, test yourself.

    The test is correct, default settings are the main/recommended settings of a product & used by most. If they are confident enough of their heuristics they should enable it by default.
     
  6. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    6,590
    Whatever you say.........

    ---------------------------
    RAP (Reactive And Proactive) test:

    http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/rap-index.xml
    http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/RAP/RAP-quadrant-Aug13-Feb14-1200.jpg

     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2014
  7. aztony

    aztony Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Posts:
    595
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I really like this program with its nice array of features, lite-ness and simplicity. A little more control over its firewall configuration is my only gripe, but I can live with that. I'm going to stay with it on my XP rig, with MBAM Pro in complement.
     
  8. Jaska

    Jaska Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Posts:
    98
    I used it some days. It is extremely light and quiet but I can't understand why it has so bad detection capabilities.
    I have tested it several times vith new packets of malware, and the latest test was with 102 new malware. It left behing 88 viruses detecting only 14! I tested the same packet with Bitdefender free and it detected 96/102 leaving only 7!
    So roboscan had to go :oops:
     
  9. Brandonn2010

    Brandonn2010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Posts:
    1,850
    Yep, that's why I don't get why it is so popular. Who cares how light it is if its detection is lacking. VB shows good results, but every test by people here seems to show the opposite.
     
  10. Romagnolo1973

    Romagnolo1973 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Posts:
    554
    Location:
    Italy - Ravenna
    Yes I have use Robo for 18 monh and for 3 I have study the delta delay from Bitdefender DB that was in my second pc.
    Delay is zero (rare) min and 7 days max with an average delay of 4 days

    For me the key is this as you can see in the VB test metodology:
    https://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/about/100procedure.xml
    As reported:
    The WildList to be used for each test will be the latest available at the time of the test set deadline. This deadline will be between five and seven days prior to the product submission deadline, and both dates will be communicated to potential participants, and publicized on the VB website, approximately two weeks prior to the deadline for each test.

    Personaly IMHO all BitDefender "son" knowing the date get an update DB that is the same of Bitdefender, so they can reach almost the same result. Pass this date DB start to diverge and % in virus catch decrease
     
  11. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,218
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Not really. With BullGuard and eScan the defs still update hourly AFAIK and any divergence is very minimal.
     
  12. FreddyFreeloader

    FreddyFreeloader Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2013
    Posts:
    527
    Location:
    Tejas
    If Roboscan can do that, why would they delay any updates?
    Bty - for all you Bitdefender fans - here's 9 mo. license freebie for Bitdefender Internet Security 2014:
    http://www.bitdefender.com/media/html/softpedia/
     
  13. FOXP2

    FOXP2 Guest

    And Lavasoft Ad-Aware, free and paid.
     
  14. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    7,807
    I am not currently using Roboscan due to concerns about the detection rate, but for me lightness is more important than detection rates. I will not use security software unless it is extremely light, which is why I have used Roboscan in the past. Because I find it very hard to get infected when I'm not using any realtime protection, I am not to fussed about choosing an antivirus with the best detection rates. For me, its about trying to find a light antivirus with good detection rates.
     
  15. FreddyFreeloader

    FreddyFreeloader Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2013
    Posts:
    527
    Location:
    Tejas
    Ditto! :thumb:
    I don't see anyone at Wilders or MalwareTips reporting any infections while using Roboscan. Most on MTs that are infected were using Avast, AVG, and that probably is because those are two of the most popular AVs.
     
  16. aztony

    aztony Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Posts:
    595
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    For those who put so much stock in throwing copious malware packets at AVs to see which has the highest detection rate here is a quote from Littlebits over at Malwaretips, which I agree with completely.

     
  17. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    6,590
    Really? :rolleyes:

    etc.......
     
  18. aztony

    aztony Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Posts:
    595
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    You forgot to include malware digitally signed. There is always going to be variables. That said, Littlebits' comment, in general, if adhered to with vigilance and practice, would negate the bulk of infections users catch.
     
  19. FOXP2

    FOXP2 Guest

    An old XP laptop is getting donated and I fired it up to wipe and install Linux.

    I forgot I had installed Roboscan in April and in the interest of pure scientific inquiry I updated. The defs/sigs lagged by fifteen versions. The "updated every day" Web site lists August 12th defs. At least the defs server leads their Webs one.

    RoboScamBD.jpg

    The support/manual_db.aspx page for manual def updates is still "coming soon" as it has been, as I can recollect, since Roboscan first appeared. No biggie since as of right now it's: August 12 2014 Manual Database update files, File Name : ALYacDBUpdate_20140812.exe.

    Purely in the interest of just-for-grins, I downloaded RIS Free and performed an uninstall/re-install. The bdcore.dll engine, currently 11.0.1.12, is still 11.0.1.6. Not surprising in that the last time anything was done to this app was in November 2013 - a Cyberverse eternity.

    Setting aside their Proactive Detection Technology and its Tetra engine (defs also listed as August 12th), in its current state and with its decent (for XP) firewall, Roboscan must be considered at best "better than nothing." And worthless against the latest zero-day exploits (within the construct of signature protection) except for the times the BD database is current as it most likely was/is for the VB100 Comparitives where RAP was on par with BD itself and their third party licensees.

    With their ESTsoft division active in the Android sphere (ALYac Android), maybe ALYac will surprise us with a Roboscan update. But with the "Latest Announcement" on that Web site being April 2011, IMHO one should run, not walk, away from Roboscan. Or maybe wait on ALYac Internet Security... Coming soon.

    Cheers.
     
  20. fblais

    fblais Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Posts:
    1,253
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    FWIW, I emailed them a few weeks ago about localized versions, but never heard anything back.
     
  21. ance

    ance formerly: fmon

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Posts:
    1,354
    Better than nothing but it would be better to install one of the other free AV. :argh:
     
  22. Oximoronman

    Oximoronman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2013
    Posts:
    95
    Roboscan is excellent.One of three which I would propose to someone.First two are Panda cloud and Baidu
     
  23. FOXP2

    FOXP2 Guest

    Fortunately, odds are that will be no one I know. Doubtless you also recommend CRT displays. And nylon bias ply tires. Windows 98. :D
     
  24. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    7,807
    Thanks for the information. It's a real shame about the slow updates, becuase I have always liked Roboscan due to it being exceptionally light and unobtrusive. For the time being, I will not install it on any of my customer's computers.
     
  25. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,103
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    lol agree. i would never install this on anyones system. i once tried it out with a few people and it was a nightmare.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.