I did that and now is OK ....i have red line around Chrome, before it wasn't there Tnx again... Here are LOG and pictures:
hi are you a developer ? for clean install , i mean a tool like eset cleanup tool or avastclear.exe or other tool that remove drivers and registry key left after an uninstall just because i had issues using more then 1 security software thanks
given serious regressions in emsisoft post v12 release, I am going to fast track my rehips testing now because if I ditch EAM I will want a reasonable replacement for the behaviour blocker.
is it hips or a sandboxing app? I asked this question a while back and was told its both, now you have just said its only isolation? If its only isolation then rehips is a odd name. By the way all allowed is not a great idea, much better to actually whitelist on the monitoring, EAM can cause weird behaviour with apps set to all allowed whilst still monitored. But of course the whitelisting on monitoring is currently bugged on v12.
It is OK, I got to see the image....Thanks. It is just that I got a warning that a tracking attempt had occurred. Not to worry.
I was trying this software, and there was a problem which I reported. And, it was put on the to do list. But, haven't heard any more from the developer.
It's because the development is sluggish. I know the feeling. I've been waiting for several months for a new release, beta or stable. I think they have fixed or added features in ReHIPS, but only internally. And so, what they may have fixed or added is not yet released as public beta. I think they want cumulative beta releases, rather than bits and pieces of releases. And let's also not forget the holidays and end-of-year financial matters that happened on December, which all added to the sluggish development.
As closed-beta tester for them, i can confirm all you said is totally exact. In term of security , ReHIPS beta is good enough to be considered as quasi-stable, all the items left in the to-do list are mostly about usability, design, bug-fixing, etc... since there is many of them , it take time, not saying the dev team is very limited in number. Honestly , i like their approach of slow cumulative betas; at least they wont release flawed and buggy builds that will bring havoc of the user's system like other famous softs does...
I agree, a "cumulative beta" is a better approach than releasing a beta every 1-2 days (like: one single bugfix = new beta-release) And after looking into the Rehips-forum the user at least knows that problems gets fixed ("Thanks for your report, fixed.",etc.), and something is happening "behind the scenes" and there is active development ("have this issue in our TODO list, still under investigation",...) I only encountered some GUI/design-bugs, but these bugs were fixed according to the forum. A new beta which includes these fixes is not yet released, but i can live with this/these bugs. Some people might see it different after they have encountered critical bugs (if there were any) and these bugs gets fixed internally, but without a new released beta they have to wait.
Exactly, this is a showstopper for me. While I agree betas releases shouldn't be every 1-2 days, several months on the other hand, is too much for me. A reasonable approach: 1 release every month.
