Regseeker beta update

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by ronjor, May 13, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    http://www.hoverdesk.net/freeware.htm

    - Improved registry cleaner
    - Improved search in registry : can now find text inside binary values
    - Display Invalid add/remove entries
    - Display Software settings registy entries
    - Ability to select only green/red items
    - Some bugs fixed
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2005
  2. hadi

    hadi Guest

    Many thanks! Ron
     
  3. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    We've been waiting a long time Hadi. :D
     
  4. Cochise

    Cochise A missed friend

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Posts:
    2,549
    Location:
    North Thoresby Lincs Good Olde England

    Hi Ron Mate,

    Am I missing something here, I've had that Update for ages 1.35 1203........


    Cochise, :cool:
     
  5. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    Afraid so my friend. RegSeeker 1.45 is ready. They even changed the color.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. hadi

    hadi Guest

    BTW Ron
    When I run regseeker's "clean the registry" I get error message with windows sound (dong)
    ------------------
    Windows - no disk
    No disk in the drive
    please insert disk in the drive
    ------------------
    which drive! i don't know. And non of the 3 buttons "cancel", "try again" or "continue" work
    so I have to ctrl-alt-delete and there it reads (regseeker-not responding)
    Any idea what causes this
     
  7. zarzenz

    zarzenz Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Posts:
    449
    Location:
    UK
    I just downloaded from the link on the page that says 1.45. However when run it still comes up as the old 1.35 build 1203... which is what is shown in the screenshot.

    So where is 1.45 and surely it should be a later build.

    Something is not right about this 1.45... anyone found the same problem.
     
  8. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    It's working fine here Hadi. Did Regseeker 1.35 work alright?
     
  9. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
  10. zarzenz

    zarzenz Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Posts:
    449
    Location:
    UK
    Ron... I don't understand this at all.

    How did you get that new version you have shown there.

    I am still installing the old 1.35 from the download link... and I have uninstalled the old version as well now... but the new downzip still loads the old version. Also my cache has been cleaned ages ago since I installed the original 1.35. Maybe I'm just too tired right now... may retry again tomorrow.

    EDIT> we posted same time... I will try the other link you gave above... thanks.
     
  11. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    Go to majorgeeks and download from author's site. I just tried it again.
     
  12. zarzenz

    zarzenz Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Posts:
    449
    Location:
    UK
    Thanks Ron... yep that worked.

    Now got the new version installed... will try it out tomorrow.

    Thanks for the other link there... not sure why it didn't work from the regseeker page... not to worry... all fine now... cheers.
     
  13. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    Success! :D
     
  14. zarzenz

    zarzenz Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    Posts:
    449
    Location:
    UK
    Wow... I like it a lot.

    I couldn't resist running the reg cleaner tonight.

    It's found over 60 new entries from the old one.

    I also like the new colour scheme as well... thanks for the info and links Ron.
     
  15. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    I'm glad to see an update after all this time.
     
  16. SSK

    SSK Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Posts:
    976
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    Nice to see an update... I'm postponing sleep to install this new version :D
     
  17. Cochise

    Cochise A missed friend

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Posts:
    2,549
    Location:
    North Thoresby Lincs Good Olde England

    Ahhhhhhh!.....Well there you have me Mate......that's a bit different to your little Linky in your first Post.....it certainly didn't show this 1.45................. :D :D
    Looks like you fooled a few others as well.........

    Cochise, :cool:
     
  18. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    It shows for me. Plenty of links to go around. :D
     

    Attached Files:

  19. Cochise

    Cochise A missed friend

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Posts:
    2,549
    Location:
    North Thoresby Lincs Good Olde England
    Thanks Ron.....Got it.........Used it.........Like it........ :D :D :D



    Cochise, :cool:
     
  20. hadi

    hadi Guest

    Yes Ron it did
    The error comes when regseeker scannig (reaches in its scanning)the entrry 175 after hitting "cancel" on error message 10 times regseeker continue till it reaches the entry 299 then it appears again.

    I'm also using "RegSupreme". could be that this has removed an important entry.

    Funny thing though
    RegSupreme "paid" finds 28 entries
    Regseeker "free" finds 299 entries

    which one should I trust
     
  21. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    Hadi

    RegSupreme is probably not as aggressive in scanning as Regseeker. Since Regseeker is beta and RegSupreme is a mature app, I would stick with RegSupreme.
     
  22. bellgamin

    bellgamin Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    5,648
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Thanks a million Ron! The new version shure is purdy.

    I deleted the old version -- no uninstall required, I hope. :eek:
     
  23. Matt_Smi

    Matt_Smi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Posts:
    359
    Cool, can we still keep our old backups folder?
     
  24. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,721
    Location:
    Texas
    Copy your backups and paste them in the new version empty backups folder.
     
  25. controler

    controler Guest

    I have always liked this application.

    NICE :D

    con
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.