pe guard

Payment option is down!

TH

 

simple and light

 

He words his posts like he was an owner or programmer for PEG. It is very misleading to post in this manner. Better to add, "I have heard" or "IMO" or something like that, instead of misleading readers.

 

There were many problems with paypal
I've linked my site with Moneybookers.com.
And the payment is available now.

Thank you all for your supports .
Ver 2.2 will be published soon.

 

Sorry PayPal was and is my only option! I don't want accounts all over the place!

TH

 

Ok, it's not a problem.
I'll try to link my site with a payment gateway that supports paypal.
Thank you anyway.

 

Even if I could pay with Credit Card without opening an account!

TH

 

Supporting PayPal now.

 

Great thanks maybe give us a choice of Buying more than 1 at a time?

TH

 

As the license is for UNLIMITED PCs, You don't need to buy more than one license using the same email & name.

 

WoW Great! Can't wait for 2.2 for x64!

Cheers,

TH

 

Does PEG have a strong self-protection?

(I don't have it installed right now to test myself, waiting for v 2.2).

EDIT: never mind my question, i made a quick test and PEG was easily killed at first attempt. : (
Hope Opaïda will try to make his otherwise nice tool a bit stronger on this lacking side...

 

PEG has self-protection against normal process killing.
https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=1701314&postcount=373

What did you try to kill it?

By the way, PEG doesn't have such protection on x64 bit.

 

My killer's name of choice is the oldy System Safety Monitor.

Didn't you said that the x64 version will be as strong performer and fully fonctional than his x86 conterpart?

Or does you mean that you made it so because PEG doesn't need this in any x64 setup??

 

Ok,
I meant that all functionalities( Modes, Options ..etc) of PE Guard are the same on x32 & x64 systems.

I do can support self-protection on x64 systems. But this will cost another process of PE Guard to be as monitor.
I think it's better now to don't do that.

 

I understand and get your point, Opaïda, and think that your are probably right on this. More active processes usually also implies added complexities and resource taxing.

But is this new obligatory independant process creation impaired by self-protection a new factoïd bring by windows 7 x64 architecture?

 

Your website opaida.110mb.com is blocked by ClearCloud DNS as Misc. Exploit.

 

Man, told you. There you go with those DNS houses trying to peddle in & out adblocking, anti-malwiring et al. in their's...

 

I have reported it to Sunbelt as a possible FP, I have a feeling its being blocked due to the host it is on 110mb.

 

Just so everyone knows the site will be removed from the Sunbelt Block List.

 

x64 kernel has Application Guard which fails down many methods that protect process from being killed.

But maybe there are methods, which I don't realize now, to do self-protecting without two processes cooperation.

 

Try to test other sites on 110mb.com.

 

Yes it is because the site is on 110mb.com because Sunbelt blocks that also.

 

by the way, can add a file to block it from running? e.g. a blacklist.

 

In current version 2.1, you can't do that.

But It's a nice feature to add.