PC Welt, test of trojan detection rate

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by LinusAV, Sep 29, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LinusAV

    LinusAV Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2006
    Posts:
    2
    Hi guys!

    I'm new aboard... Hope, anyone of you can find some usage for my upcoming posts and comments ;)

    Getting fired up with my first post here. The following link leads to an up-to-date test of the trojan detection rate of the most known av solution providers. It's in german but the statistic table should be self-instructional.

    There you are: http://www.pcwelt.de/news/sicherheit/59058/index.html

    Looks like WebWaher and AntiVir made a stable run for the top competitors over a periode of time now...

    What are your thoughts?

    Greetings, LinusAV
     
  2. FRug

    FRug Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Posts:
    309
  3. Technodrome

    Technodrome Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    2,140
    Location:
    New York
    Test was done by av-test.org. Results should be valid.



    tD
     
  4. Tommy

    Tommy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Posts:
    1,169
    Location:
    Buenos Aires - Munic
    Short translation:

    Test enviorment:
    - 33 AV programs
    - 300.000 Trojans from 2006 (no worms, no virus)
    - 6 Computer Intels Core Duo 6600 CPU / 2 GB RAM.

    Results:
    1. Place: Webwasher with 99,97 % detection
    2. Place: Antivir
    3. Place: G Data AVK 2007

    - 50% of tested AV's have a detection rate arround 90%
    - Surprize: The chinese Newcomer "Rising" liitle better than Panda and Trend Micro
    - Frisk (F-Prot), Sophos o CA (Etrust) nearly a disaster

     
  5. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,100
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Isnt Webwashers AV and AS based on the Sophos engine.
     
  6. LinusAV

    LinusAV Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2006
    Posts:
    2
    The article says that WebWasher uses the Antivir engine along with an in-house development of Secure Computing... Declares the lead with a gain of 0,018 percent to AntiVir.
     
  7. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    AntiVir does well again.

    Yes Rising results are a surprise,but so are the results for Ewido.
     
  8. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,056
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Results are a bit strange but mostly make sense. Rising has been adding samples like mad (thanks to our very own pykko :D) and hence has got good detection rates this time.

    Dr.Web, well, I can see it has improved somewhat. They work hard to add samples, but I have a feeling that they are not having enough analysts.I am quite impressed by the results of AntiVir, NOD32 and BitDefender. Good job from all three. :)

    But the strange thing is that IMO F-Prot should score better than what it did. I'm not saying F-Prot is top-tier, but I am pretty sure detection rates should be better than 77% :doubt:
     
  9. shek

    shek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Posts:
    342
    Location:
    SE CHINA/NYC USA
    although on this test, avk 2007 is better than 2006. But I still prefer 2006. Because bitdefender heuristic engine and antispyware module are better than avast. A small 0.06% disadvantage on trojan is nothing.
     
  10. Inspector Clouseau

    Inspector Clouseau AV Expert

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Posts:
    1,329
    Location:
    Maidenhead, UK
    Nope that looks "ok" to me since we all know that version 3 sucks pretty much. And Andreas Marx tested the old version - i've just called him via phone.
     
  11. dan_maran

    dan_maran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Posts:
    1,053
    Location:
    Stamford, CT
    Thanks for the clarification. :)
     
  12. Technodrome

    Technodrome Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    2,140
    Location:
    New York
    Very good results for avast!, Norman and AVG.


    tD
     
  13. shek

    shek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Posts:
    342
    Location:
    SE CHINA/NYC USA
    does anybody know why there is such a big difference between avg and ewido? since both of them belong to grisoft, they should share the samples with each other. Any ideas?

    shek
     
  14. austin1257

    austin1257 Infrequent Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    Posts:
    31
    Wonder why Trojan Hunter wasnt included.
     
  15. Tommy

    Tommy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Posts:
    1,169
    Location:
    Buenos Aires - Munic
    Because they tested AntiVirus aplications and not Trojan Scanner.
     
  16. Inspector Clouseau

    Inspector Clouseau AV Expert

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Posts:
    1,329
    Location:
    Maidenhead, UK
    Since when is Ewido (as standalone product) an Antivirus Scanner?
     
  17. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    Maybe Magnus didn't like the results................................again? :D ;) :)
     
  18. Tommy

    Tommy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Posts:
    1,169
    Location:
    Buenos Aires - Munic
    UPS, you are right,didn't saw that Ewido was included (have ridden only the top of the result list). But didn't they say in the test, i think i can read german, that they only tested AV aplications o_O
     
  19. Unity

    Unity Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Posts:
    112
    Location:
    Toulouse ~ France
    heh...well another very average results for dr web , i should get used to it tho :rolleyes:
     
  20. Durad

    Durad Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Posts:
    592
    Location:
    Canada
    What trojans were tested?
    Interesting that somebody could collect 300000 trojans for 1 year

    Its 821 trojan daily

    or

    34 every hour

    or

    more than 6 every 10 minutes

    o_Oo_O?





    |)
     
  21. JerryM

    JerryM Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Posts:
    4,296
    It has been my (unlearned) opinion that if one has a top tier AV, he does not need an AT.

    Now, however, the lines are blurred and what we once considered a dedicated AT has branched out to be an anti-malware application. Some applications, such as a-squared seem to do better than most dedicated AS applications.

    Although I have a lifetime license for Ewido, as time goes by I am less and less impressed by its capabilities in any area.

    I wish a-squared had been tested, as it is as much an AV as Ewido I think.

    Avast did better than I would have expected. I have always considered the trojan detection below par and would want an AT along with Avast. But now I see they have made great strides in that area. I assume the free and the paid would show the same detection.

    Jerry
     
  22. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,038
    If you have kaspersky or antivir you dont need separate antitrojan. but i have noticed that some nod32 know that the trojan detection isnt the best so they use something like ewido or boclean. i probaly could just use kav and a firewall and be protected enough. but i do like prevx1
     
  23. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    Jerry,

    I would think you are right about results being the same for paid and free versions of the programs tested.

    It would have been interesting to see the results for A-Squared versus Ewido.
     
  24. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,846
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    an older anti-trojan comparative with ewido vs. a-squared is also on av-comparatives i think. (p.s. sorry for spamming ;).
     
  25. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    Thanks IBK,

    I'll take a look at that.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.