PC Security Test 06

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Airking, Jun 25, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Airking

    Airking Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Posts:
    1,083
    After running PC Security Test 2006, it displayed a number of weaknesses. One of which was a simulation of infection with an unknown virus. Protection software running: NOD 32 v2.51.26, Process Guard v3.150, Worm Guard v4, TDS 3. Kerio Personal Firewall 4, Spyware Blaster, SysGuard v7.

    How credible are these types of tests?
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 25, 2006
  2. DavidCo

    DavidCo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Posts:
    503
    Location:
    UK
    I am always suspicious if a 'free' test is trying to sell you something.
    :shifty:
     
  3. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    It's a behavior-blocking test so it does not tell anything about NOD32's detection capabilities.
     
  4. Airking

    Airking Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Posts:
    1,083
    Thanks for the feedback. So I shouldn't be too concerned?
     
  5. Biscuit

    Biscuit Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Posts:
    978
    Location:
    Isle of Man
  6. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,047
    Location:
    Saudi Arabia/ Pakistan
    It,s funny. In one year the test remains the same.
    2005 version i used it with so many different security appliances( running to hether) and could never got above 75 percent.
    But it sounds interesting though not reliable at all.
    With most applications i got 50 percent protection for Viruses and spywares.
     
  7. steve1955

    steve1955 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2004
    Posts:
    1,384
    Location:
    Sunny(in my dreams)Manchester,England
    I wonder if the some security apps actually recognise this as a test and dont react to it like a real threat?
     
  8. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,873
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    That test is a real joke, you shouldn't take any stock in it at all. :mad:
     
  9. gerardwil

    gerardwil Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2004
    Posts:
    4,748
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    SUPERAS blocks install
    Prevx1 jailed some
    KAV detects some

    Gerard
     
  10. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    I did run it once but I saw it's nothing than a little advertising tool for promoting a certain "security" program...
     
  11. steve1955

    steve1955 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2004
    Posts:
    1,384
    Location:
    Sunny(in my dreams)Manchester,England
    I think any sig based security product could be made to detect the "threats" this program invokes or even block the installation of the prog in the first place:-but is there any point,any prog that shows both Nod and Kav to be inadequate AV progs is just a joke!
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.