People seem to bash Norton Anitivirus alot and sometimes I can understand why when everyone say it misses viruses. I personally feel that all AV's will miss a virus sometimes, no product will ever be full-proof. I use Bitdefender but I've never heard of a company called softwin at all. I like the product but I feel that the interface is pretty ugly. Anyways, NAV 2003 or Bitdender pro, which one do you think gets the edge? Also, Since the Mcafee vs. Norton war is pretty one-sided favoring Mcafee products what do you think Norton has to do to gain back the trust of people who know more about viruses/AV's than just update and you'll be okay. If you don't trust Norton? How or what do you think Norton should do to upgrade it's product?