NOD32 for XP: which version?

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by FanJ, Jan 28, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    Hi,

    I just bought a licence of NOD32 for my new XP-home machine.
    But which version to use?
    I assume:
    for Windows NT/2000/2003/XP - standard 2.50.25
    Or should I get this one:
    for Windows 2003/XP 64-BIT - standard 2.51.20

    Thanks in advance !

    Edited to add:
    from this page:
    http://www.eset.com/download/download.htm
     
  2. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,793
    Location:
    Texas
    Jan

    I use standard 2.50.25 on my XP machine. Either version will work though.
     
  3. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    OK, thanks Ron ! :D

    PS-1:

    The components on my W98SE machine are:
    Information about installed components
    NOD32 For Windows 95/98/ME - Base
    Version: 2.50.45
    NOD32 for Windows 95/98/ME - Standard component
    Version: 2.50.45
    NOD32 For Windows 95/98/ME - Internet support
    Version: 2.50.45

    I guess that I will get things like that also on the XP box; right?

    PS-2:

    I'm still at the moment on the W98SE-box ;)
    Still collecting things to burn on CD's to move over later (for example NOD32; in no way I want that new box connected to the internet without it :)).
     
  4. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,793
    Location:
    Texas
    Same type info.
     

    Attached Files:

  5. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    Thanks again Ron ! :D

    Hm, strange, I see that I have component-versions 2.50.45 and that you have 2.50.25.
    Well, I guess that there is an easy explanation for that difference...
    I downloaded and re-installed the latest NOD32 on my W98SE box somewhere at the end of last year.
     
  6. ForcaT

    ForcaT Guest

  7. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,793
    Location:
    Texas
    Dutch. :D http://www.eset.com/download/download.htm
     

    Attached Files:

  8. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    LOL, but I have the English version of NOD32 (on my Dutch system) ;)
     
  9. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,793
    Location:
    Texas
    o_O Beats me. :blink: :D
     
  10. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,148
    Location:
    Denmark
    2.51.20 english version. I see the logic of version numbers strikes again :p
     
  11. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    I'm afraid so, Brian.

    :doubt:
     
  12. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,148
    Location:
    Denmark
    Well both of them works just fine on XP :)
     
  13. helperme

    helperme Guest

    2.51 fixed my Update attempt failed (Downloaded file is damaged.) error
     
  14. Brian N

    Brian N Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Posts:
    2,148
    Location:
    Denmark
    ^ And 2.50.45/31 fixed an issue with Windows update.
     
  15. sir_carew

    sir_carew Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Posts:
    884
    Location:
    Santiago, Chile
    I'm using x64 version over an old 32 processor.

    Information about installed components
    NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/x64 - Administrative tools
    Version: 2.51.20
    NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/x64 - Base
    Version: 2.51.20
    NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/x64 - Internet support
    Version: 2.51.20
    NOD32 for Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/x64 - Standard component
    Version: 2.51.20

    Operating system information
    Platform: Windows XP
    Version: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
    Version of common control components: 5.82.2900
    RAM: 376 MB
    Processor: AMD Duron(tm) processor (1101 MHz)
     
  16. Happy Bytes

    Happy Bytes Guest

    As far as i know the 64x Version determines automatically the target cpu type. There's not much difference between 64x and 32x basically only the lowlevel stuff. That said it should install the proper drivers during install.
     
  17. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    Thanks all for your replies !

    All your replies were much appreciated :D

    Hi Happy Bytes,

    CPU type and Windows version are different things.
    Well, I guess they are ;)

    Well, as you said "it should install the proper drivers during install."

    Regards, Jan.
     
  18. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,456
    I use the 64bit version on my 32bit system without any problem, because it support both system versions...
     
  19. Happy Bytes

    Happy Bytes Guest

    Yep, that's right.
     
  20. FanJ

    FanJ Guest

    OK, thanks again guys :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.