Nod32 conflicting with PG and creatin problem to Boclean???

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by Atomas31, Jul 8, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Atomas31

    Atomas31 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Posts:
    923
    Location:
    Montreal, Quebec
    Hi,

    After sending an email to Kevin from Boclean concerning the pick of CPU usage of Boclean (with version 4.12.003 around 16%) and the conflict with Process Guard, he send me the following message :

    " the problem is NOT BOClean and it is NOT process guard. The PROBLEM is NOD32 conflicting with Process Guard. The two are INCOMPATIBLE at the kernel driver level and that's what folks who don't use NOD32 have no problems with PG and BOClean."

    Can someone explain to me how can NOD32 conflicting with PG can create only problem to Boclean? I am kind of loss there!!!!

    Does NOD32 are aware of this conflict and are they working on it?

    By the way, I have the french version of NOD32 wich mean I still have version 2.12.3 so maybe the situation is rectified with the latest version of NOD32.

    Thank you,
    Atomas31
     
  2. GuruGuy

    GuruGuy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2005
    Posts:
    48
    Nevermind..........I must be hallucinating!
     
  3. DonKid

    DonKid Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2004
    Posts:
    566
    Location:
    S?o Paulo, Brazil
    I use PG since NOD32 version 2.12.3 and never had a problem with them.
    Best Regards,

    DonKid.
     
  4. Atomas31

    Atomas31 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Posts:
    923
    Location:
    Montreal, Quebec
    Hi Donkid,

    I don't see any problem between NOD32 and PG either but I see some CPU peek with Boclean and if I am understanting correctly what Kevin (from Boclean) as send me : the problem with the CPU peek of Boclean is related to a "conflict" between NOD32 and PGo_O?? I'm not expert but it seems that Kevin has giving me a very strange answer to the peek problem of Boclean.... ain't it?


    Atomas31
     
  5. Bubba

    Bubba Updates Team

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2002
    Posts:
    11,271
    No disrespect to Kevin when I say this since it's my slowness in understanding....but after one reads Kevins posts and shakes his\her head a few times and then re-reads his post again....it usually becomes very clear what he is saying.

    In any case....this whole thread is well worth a read....but to get to the explanation by Kevin of his thoughts concerning PG\BOclean\CPU spikes....see this post.
     
  6. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,619
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Maybe I'm to tired but I'm not getting it.
     
  7. BlueZannetti

    BlueZannetti Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Posts:
    6,590
    Here's the same basic message, using somewhat different words, that Kevin sent to me in response to some comments some time ago...
    Does this help?

    Blue
     
  8. Mongol

    Mongol Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Posts:
    1,581
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    The latest version Nod32 and PG have been working fine for some time now on my desktop. No conflicts at all noted here.
     
  9. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,619
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Yes Blue thanks.
     
  10. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,619
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Are you running BOClean as well?
     
  11. Mongol

    Mongol Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Posts:
    1,581
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Nope I have the newest Ewido 3.5 here along with Counterspy..
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.